Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:51 PM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >> On 24/02/17 11:30, Andrew Wilkins wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM Adam Collard >>

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical < cur...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new release of Juju, 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here! > > > ## What's new in 2.1.0 > > - Model migration > - Interactive `add-cloud` > - Networking changes > - Conjure-up > - LXD credential changes > -

Re: Proposal: DNS for Juju Charms

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Casey Marshall < casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote: > Awesome idea! Probably more of a wishlist thing at this point.. but can we > also add SSHFP records for all the units? > ​Great idea! ​ > -Casey > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Marco Ceppi

Re: Promulgated charms (production readiness)

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Tim Van Steenburgh wrote: > Right, but NRPE can be related to any charm too. My point was just that the > charm doesn't need to explicitly support monitoring. It totally does, IMO. process count, disk, mem usage are all

Re: Planning for Juju 2.2 (16.10 timeframe)

Lots of interesting ideas here. Some other ideas (apologies if these have already been proposed, but I don't *think* they have) a) A small one - please can we have 'juju get '? See https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1423548 Maybe this is already in the config schema work, but it would

Re: Reactive roadmap

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Simon Davy <simon.d...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >> 1) Is there a roadmap for reactive? A target for a stable 1.0 release, >> or similar? We'd ideally

Re: Reactive roadmap

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:05 PM, John Meinel wrote: > ... > >> >> >> > 3) Downloading from the internet. This issue has been common in >> > charmstore charms, and is discouraged, AIUI. But the same issue >> > applies for layers, and possibly with more effect, due to a

Reactive roadmap

Hi all My team (Online Services at Canonical) maintains >20 private charms for our services, plus a few charmstore charms. Most of these charms are written with charmhelpers ansible support, or with the Services framework. We would like to move towards consolidating these approaches (as both

Re: [ANN] charm-tools 1.9.3

On Friday, 27 November 2015, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:05 AM Simon Davy <bloodearn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thursday, 26 November 2015, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov

[ANN] charm-tools 1.9.3

On Thursday, 26 November 2015, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:08 PM Simon Davy <bloodearn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 25 November 2015 at 16:02, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: >> > ## Wheel Ho

Re: Latest on the LXD Provider!

On 18 November 2015 at 17:15, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > Simon, I've gone ahead and added you as a subscriber to the blueprint for > this feature. That was as things develop you can stay in the loop. > > Would you be willing to give feedback on how this

Re: Latest on the LXD Provider!

On 16 November 2015 at 17:07, Rick Harding <rick.hard...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Simon Davy wrote: > >> Some uses cases OTTOMH: >> >> - mounting specific code branches into the lxd for development > > This is a feature we're looking at Juju

Re: Latest on the LXD Provider!

On 10 November 2015 at 20:46, Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 10/11/15 11:06, Simon Davy wrote: >> We've been using lxd with the manual provider, really been impressed >> with what lxd brings to the table. > > Yes, it's a really dramatic leap forward

Re: Unit number is increasing in latest juju version.

On 13 November 2015 at 15:02, Matthew Williams wrote: > Hi Mark, Sunitha, > > My apologies, I should have included the explanation in the original email. > > This was a change to address a long standing bug: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1174610 Ah -

Re: Latest on the LXD Provider!

On 9 November 2015 at 18:19, Rick Harding wrote: > Thanks Katherine. That's looking great. One request, next demo I'd be > curious to see how easy it is to run multiple lxd environments locally. I > know it's been possible with lxc before with a bunch of config. Just

Re: How should we change default config values in charms?

On 16 August 2015 at 19:41, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 14/08/15 04:56, Stuart Bishop wrote: I've discussed similar things with regard to the PostgreSQL charm and autotuning, with the decision being that charm defaults should be set so things 'just work' in a development

Re: Coordinating actions in a service

On 8 May 2015 at 14:28, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.net wrote: - The requirement of running an action across all units but without executing in all of them at once also sounds very common. In fact, it's so common that it should probably be the default when somebody dispatches an action

Re: Call for help for a juju plugin

On 4 March 2015 at 13:45, Jorge O. Castro jo...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi everyone, Sometimes people deploy things like a complex bundle on a cloud and it doesn't work. Having to wrangle the person to find out which units broke, juju sshing in and manually digging around logs and refiring off

Re: Makefile target names

On 22 January 2015 at 15:13, David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com wrote: lint: - make lint Could we also make[1] the charm linter lint the makefile for the presence of targets agreed in the outcome of this thread? [1] Pun fully intended :) -- Simon -- Juju mailing list

Re: Makefile target names

On 22 January 2015 at 16:29, David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:17:26PM +, Simon Davy wrote: On 22 January 2015 at 15:13, David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com wrote: lint: - make lint Could we also make[1] the charm linter lint

Re: python-django charm questions

On 2 December 2014 at 17:04, sheila miguez she...@pobox.com wrote: Hi all, Pip wishes * pip_extra_args support so that I can use --no-index --find-links=/path/to/wheels (this is in my fork) * remove --upgrade --use-mirrors, leave it up to the user (in my fork) First class support for

Re: Migrating the python-django charm to Ansible

roles that Simon Davy and I (mainly) are reusing and improving for some internal services [2]. Please take a look and see if there's things that could be useful - but our use-case is a bit different (for example, the payload role is because we are never pulling sourcecode branches from external

Re: SSH host key maintenance, local provider

This is what I have: Host 10.0.3.* StrictHostKeyChecking no UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null ForwardAgent yes LogLevel ERROR ControlMaster auto ControlPath /tmp/ssh_mux_%h_%p_%r ControlPersist 8h LogLevel ERROR is nice, means you don't get any key warnings. HTH --

Re: SSH host key maintenance, local provider

On 3 October 2014 13:21, Simon Davy bloodearn...@gmail.com wrote: This is what I have: Host 10.0.3.* StrictHostKeyChecking no UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null ForwardAgent yes LogLevel ERROR ControlMaster auto ControlPath /tmp/ssh_mux_%h_%p_%r ControlPersist 8h

Re: Call for Charm School topics

On 9 September 2014 18:45, Sebastian sebas5...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Simon! For example, imagine you have an Ansible charm which inside are some php settings applied like php memory limit, and then you relate a subordinated charm to it, that creates a new php.ini with custom configurations

Re: Revision file on charms

On 8 September 2014 16:10, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote: you need to keep in mind the revision file will never match a local charm version in the state server (it will at min be at least one higher than that). This goes back to removing the need for users to manage the

Re: Hook firing

On 3 September 2014 13:12, Michael Nelson michael.nel...@canonical.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Darryl Weaver darryl.wea...@canonical.com wrote: Hi All, I am still a little confused as to when Juju decides to run hooks. Obviously hooks run when something changes. However, I

Re: Best practices for fat charms

Resending this to the list, rather than just Jorge, sorry. On 1 April 2014 20:07, Jorge O. Castro jo...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi everyone, Matt Bruzek and I have been doing some charm testing on a machine that does not have general access to the internet. So charms that pull from PPAs, github,