Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-16 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:17 AM Marco Ceppi wrote: > If it's acceptable to do so, I'll propose changes to charmhelpers and >> charms.reactive at some point. It would be nice to be able to have a core >> set of Python helpers that work on all platforms. >> > > I think

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-16 Thread Marco Ceppi
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, 2:12 AM Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:30 AM Andrew Wilkins < > andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi >> wrote: >> >>> There are two things that need

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-16 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:30 AM Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> There are two things that need to be done. The first, we need the >> reactive framework to be ported to powershell - that way

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-04 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi wrote: > There are two things that need to be done. The first, we need the reactive > framework to be ported to powershell - that way we can have charms written > in powershell and compiled as such. I know the cloud base

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-04 Thread Nate Finch
At least... according to the core code, but it occurs to me I may well be mistaken about what's allowed by the charm authoring tools and/or charmstore. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:16 AM Nate Finch wrote: > BTW, I don't believe this is true. I didn't work on series in

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-04 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 4 April 2016 at 14:17, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to write a charm that should be mostly identical on Windows and > Linux, so I think it would make sense to have common code in the form of a > layer. > > Is anyone working on getting "charm

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-04 Thread Nate Finch
>From what I've read, there's no server-side story to Ubuntu on Windows. It's purely desktop, and in fact, only installs on desktop versions of Windows 10. That could help with tooling for charm authors, but obviously the charm code itself still needs to run on vanilla Windows. The main tricky

Re: Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-04 Thread Rick Harding
I know that Gabriel and some of the CloudBase folks seemed interested in layers and possibly some tooling with powershell. I'm not sure how far that went but I thought they were experimenting during the charmer's summit. That would help with a charm build on windows, but not for some common code

Charm layers & Windows

2016-04-04 Thread Andrew Wilkins
Hi, I would like to write a charm that should be mostly identical on Windows and Linux, so I think it would make sense to have common code in the form of a layer. Is anyone working on getting "charm build", layers, and friends to work with Windows workloads? If not, I may look into it myself.