Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-24 Thread Cory Johns
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ryan Beisner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Cory Johns > wrote: > >> For clarity, I'd just like to note that https://jujucharms.com/ubuntu/8 >> is the candidate revision, and you can deploy this

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-22 Thread Ryan Beisner
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Cory Johns wrote: > For clarity, I'd just like to note that https://jujucharms.com/ubuntu/8 > is the candidate revision, and you can deploy this on 1.25.6 (without > --channel support) by being specific about the revision number: >

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-22 Thread Cory Johns
For clarity, I'd just like to note that https://jujucharms.com/ubuntu/8 is the candidate revision, and you can deploy this on 1.25.6 (without --channel support) by being specific about the revision number: juju deploy cs:ubuntu-8 On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Rick Harding

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-19 Thread Marco Ceppi
Obsoleted, their aliases eventually removed On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 4:03 AM Ryan Beisner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the >> charm

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-18 Thread Ryan Beisner
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the > charm including a repo change. > Ok, thanks for the info. What will become of the old repos?:

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-16 Thread Marco Ceppi
The repo has been updated: https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM Marco Ceppi wrote: > I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the > charm including a repo change. Future mp will be against this repo >

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-14 Thread Tim Penhey
Marco, This is awesome. I use the ubuntu charm all the time for testing, and seeing the workload version and workload status being set is pretty cool. I had hoped that seeing the "unknown" status would apply gentle pressure to get people to set a workload status. Winning!!! Tim On

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-14 Thread Marco Ceppi
Hi Ryan, I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try again? Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner wrote: > Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes? I'd like to > validate with 1.25.6 as the

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-14 Thread Ryan Beisner
Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes? I'd like to validate with 1.25.6 as the current stable release, but --channel isn't a thing there. I tried to `charm pull ubuntu --channel candidate` but received: ERROR cannot get archive: unauthorized: access denied. Thanks, Ryan

Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

2016-09-14 Thread Marco Ceppi
Hey everyone, Normally, I wouldn't bother with an update like this, but it's slightly larger than I'd care to just push out. Today, the Ubuntu charm is a no-op, which is largely the goal of the charm. However, as juju becomes more rich this no-op charm starts to look incomplete. I know a few