I made the comparison yesterday of interfaces.juju.solutions performing a
similar role to maven central and providing artifact versions to releases
that ask for that release.
On 4 Nov 2016 08:12, "Konstantinos Tsakalozos"
wrote:
> Indeed, layer and interface
Indeed, layer and interface versioning should please some release managers.
Thanks,
Konstantinos
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Ryan Beisner
wrote:
> As far as I know, there is no notion of a stable Layer or a stable
> Interface. That makes it difficult to carry
As far as I know, there is no notion of a stable Layer or a stable
Interface. That makes it difficult to carry any layered charm as "stable,"
and quite awkward to cherry-pick and backport fixes to stable charms which
depend on Layers and Interfaces.
As you mention, you could synthesize stability
Hi everyone,
This is probably a question on best practises.
A reasonable ask for a build process is to be able to reproduce the same
output artifacts from a certain point in time. For example, I would like to
be able to rebuild the same charm I build 10 minutes, or a week or a month
ago. I can