Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

np On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:31 AM, roger peppe wrote: > On 7 April 2016 at 17:34, Reed O'Brien wrote: > >> Do you want to NAT the IPv4 traffic? n > > > > You do want to NAT the traffic, unless you have routing explicitly setup. > > Ah,

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

np On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:31 AM, roger peppe wrote: > On 7 April 2016 at 17:34, Reed O'Brien wrote: > >> Do you want to NAT the IPv4 traffic? n > > > > You do want to NAT the traffic, unless you have routing explicitly setup. > > Ah,

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

On 7 April 2016 at 17:34, Reed O'Brien wrote: >> Do you want to NAT the IPv4 traffic? n > > You do want to NAT the traffic, unless you have routing explicitly setup. Ah, thanks. I knew it must be something stupid like that. It now bootstraps and works OK, yay! Thanks

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

On 7 April 2016 at 17:34, Reed O'Brien wrote: >> Do you want to NAT the IPv4 traffic? n > > You do want to NAT the traffic, unless you have routing explicitly setup. Ah, thanks. I knew it must be something stupid like that. It now bootstraps and works OK, yay! Thanks

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

FYI, had the same issue on IBM hardware, and Antonio helped me get through it: * dpkg-reconfigure lxd was necessary to rename the bridge * Then bootstrap still failed with 2016-04-07 16:35:17 ERROR cmd supercommand.go:448 no registered provider for "lxd" ERROR failed to bootstrap model:

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

> Do you want to NAT the IPv4 traffic? n You do want to NAT the traffic, unless you have routing explicitly setup. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, roger peppe wrote: > OK, thanks, that gets me further. I'd used the netmask from the > example value in the default

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

> Do you want to NAT the IPv4 traffic? n You do want to NAT the traffic, unless you have routing explicitly setup. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, roger peppe wrote: > OK, thanks, that gets me further. I'd used the netmask from the > example value in the default

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

OK, thanks, that gets me further. I'd used the netmask from the example value in the default /etc/default/lxd-bridge - I assumed they were the same format, as the values were. ## IPv4 netmask (e.g. 255.255.255.0) Now my bootstrap is stuck further on while installing cpu-checker:

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

OK, thanks, that gets me further. I'd used the netmask from the example value in the default /etc/default/lxd-bridge - I assumed they were the same format, as the values were. ## IPv4 netmask (e.g. 255.255.255.0) Now my bootstrap is stuck further on while installing cpu-checker:

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

I think you need to enter the CIDR netmask as a bit len, e.g. 24 rather than as 255.255.255.0. See https://github.com/reedobrien/juju-notes/blob/master/writing-a-ci-test.md and the section on LXD for my personal notes about a working config. HTH, Reed On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:14 AM, roger peppe

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

I think you need to enter the CIDR netmask as a bit len, e.g. 24 rather than as 255.255.255.0. See https://github.com/reedobrien/juju-notes/blob/master/writing-a-ci-test.md and the section on LXD for my personal notes about a working config. HTH, Reed On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:14 AM, roger peppe

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

I tried it. I get this error after typing in lots of ipv4 details: /var/lib/dpkg/info/lxd.postinst: 8: /var/lib/dpkg/info/lxd.postinst: arithmetic expression: expecting ')': " 5 - (255.255.255.0 / 8) " My full interaction was as follows: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15671384/ On 7 April 2016 at

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

I tried it. I get this error after typing in lots of ipv4 details: /var/lib/dpkg/info/lxd.postinst: 8: /var/lib/dpkg/info/lxd.postinst: arithmetic expression: expecting ')': " 5 - (255.255.255.0 / 8) " My full interaction was as follows: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15671384/ On 7 April 2016 at

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

Did you run dpkg-reconfigure lxd ? That's what I ran once I installed the new lxd package and it seemed to get things working. Tycho added some helpful prompts as part of "juju bootstrap" to point users in the right direction if LXD looks to be improperly configured.

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

Did you run dpkg-reconfigure lxd ? That's what I ran once I installed the new lxd package and it seemed to get things working. Tycho added some helpful prompts as part of "juju bootstrap" to point users in the right direction if LXD looks to be improperly configured.

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

To add to this conversation, I have encountered this issue today and have been unable to resolve it so far in the limited time I've been able to spend on it. I'm running on Trusty; I have the new version of lxd and the latest version of Juju tip. In my case, the issue seems to be that my lcdbr0

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

To add to this conversation, I have encountered this issue today and have been unable to resolve it so far in the limited time I've been able to spend on it. I'm running on Trusty; I have the new version of lxd and the latest version of Juju tip. In my case, the issue seems to be that my lcdbr0

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

Hi All, Thank you very much for posting this thread. I've been following the "getting started" developer's guide at https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/getting-started, and this info got me unstuck. I figured that I'd mention that, when I ran dpkg-reconfigure, I had to create an ipv4 subnet,

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

The rename works if you haven't removed `lxc1` which removes the original `lxcbr0`. If you have you will need to correctly configure another bridge as the new `lxcbr0` that is created has the same configuration as `lxdbr0` if you configured an `lxdbr0`... For me this led to two bridges with the

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

The rename works if you haven't removed `lxc1` which removes the original `lxcbr0`. If you have you will need to correctly configure another bridge as the new `lxcbr0` that is created has the same configuration as `lxdbr0` if you configured an `lxdbr0`... For me this led to two bridges with the

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

I think you'll need to `service lxd-bridge restart' in either case. On 6 April 2016 at 22:18, Horacio Duran wrote: > yes, that workaround works, also you can change /etc/default/lxd-bridge > and restart the lxd-bridge service. > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM,

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

I think you'll need to `service lxd-bridge restart' in either case. On 6 April 2016 at 22:18, Horacio Duran wrote: > yes, that workaround works, also you can change /etc/default/lxd-bridge > and restart the lxd-bridge service. > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM,

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

yes, that workaround works, also you can change /etc/default/lxd-bridge and restart the lxd-bridge service. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Casey Marshall wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Alexis Bruemmer < > alexis.bruem...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

yes, that workaround works, also you can change /etc/default/lxd-bridge and restart the lxd-bridge service. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Casey Marshall wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Alexis Bruemmer < > alexis.bruem...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Alexis Bruemmer < alexis.bruem...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > As recently highlighted in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566589 the > latest LXD will not work with Juju 2.0-beta3. This is a result of LXD > moving to use a default bridge of lxdbr0

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Alexis Bruemmer < alexis.bruem...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > As recently highlighted in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566589 the > latest LXD will not work with Juju 2.0-beta3. This is a result of LXD > moving to use a default bridge of lxdbr0