Re: arch constraint default changed?

2014-05-16 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:28 AM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.comwrote: We shouldn't ever have to worry about whether or not --upload-tools was used, because it's *already* been used at the point where we pick instances, and the single possible arch is thus already chosen, entirely

Problem deploying test charm

2014-05-16 Thread Xander Maas
Hi all, I am trying to create an ownCloud charm with Ceph support. (I already had a more or less working dev version) When I try to deploy my latest revision, juju doesn’t seem to get the latest (local) revision. I noticed this, as I had a typo in my config.yaml (For your info: My MaaS

Re: Problem deploying test charm

2014-05-16 Thread Michael Nelson
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Xander Maas xjm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am trying to create an ownCloud charm with Ceph support. (I already had a more or less working dev version) When I try to deploy my latest revision, juju doesn’t seem to get the latest (local) revision. I

[ANN] charmworldlib 0.4.0

2014-05-16 Thread Marco Ceppi
Hello all, charmworldlib is a Python library designed to make interfacing with the Charmworld API in Python easy. Today charmworldlib 0.4.0 was released which brings the project up to feature parity with the bundles API endpoint in charmworld (many thanks to Tim Van Steenburgh for his work

Clarifying cloud-specific charms in the store

2014-05-16 Thread Jorge O. Castro
Hi everyone, As part of the review process for the backup charm this came up: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1259630 Policy states: Should not use anything infrastructure-provider specific (i.e. querying EC2 metadata service) Note that this is a should, not a must, in the same way that

Re: Ubuntu Vagrant boxes with Juju

2014-05-16 Thread Jorge O. Castro
Trusty images are now available, testing on these is greatly appreciated: http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/vagrant/trusty/current/ On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Sebastian sebas5...@gmail.com wrote: Can Ben share your Vagrantfile code to see if I can help too :) As per the IRC discussion Chuck

Re: Ubuntu Vagrant boxes with Juju

2014-05-16 Thread Sebastian sebas
Awesome! Thanks! Abs, Sebas. Enviado pelo meu celular. Em 16/05/2014, às 10:56, Jorge O. Castro jo...@ubuntu.com escreveu: Trusty images are now available, testing on these is greatly appreciated: http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/vagrant/trusty/current/ On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:50 PM,

Re: Problem deploying test charm

2014-05-16 Thread Xander Maas
Hi Matt and Michael, That was the 'problem'. I now can deploy my test ownCloud unit, with (alpha) Ceph support. My additions for Ceph is quite basic and needs some additional testing before I commit a new 'build' I hope to do so coming week Xander Sent from my iPhone On 16 mei 2014, at

Re: [Proposal] Requiring Go 1.2 across the board

2014-05-16 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:08 PM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.comwrote: Hello, This is a proposal that we raise the minimum Go spec from Go 1.1 to Go 1.2. Motivation: * Now that T is out, we have to support Juju on two series (Precise and Trusty[1]) with two compilers, gc and

Re: [Proposal] Requiring Go 1.2 across the board

2014-05-16 Thread David Cheney
William, could you please raise this at the team leads meeting tonight on my behalf. The steps look quite straight forward, they just need to go on a card and get done. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com wrote: +1 On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Andrew

What is required to switch back to using the tip of goose ?

2014-05-16 Thread David Cheney
Why is the Openstack provider pinned to an old version of lauchpad.net/goose ? What is required to use the latest version ? -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Re: [Proposal] Requiring Go 1.2 across the board

2014-05-16 Thread John Meinel
I believe the team lead meeting is last night, not tonight. I'm fine with this, AFAIK the only specific change that needs to be made is to get golang-go 1.2.* into ppa:juju/golang. I hope the people (Curtis and Ian) are still planning on configuring the new Jenkins lander as a Precise machine,

Re: What is required to switch back to using the tip of goose ?

2014-05-16 Thread John Meinel
AFAIK there is one patch which landed a couple of days ago that changes an API that used to only return an io.ReadCloser, error that now returns io.ReadCloser, Headers, error, and we can safely ignore the Headers (someone else needed it who wanted to use goose). I think the only reason we aren't

Re: What is required to switch back to using the tip of goose ?

2014-05-16 Thread David Cheney
There also appears to be a small API breakage # launchpad.net/juju-core/provider/openstack provider/openstack/storage.go:59: assignment count mismatch: 2 = 3 On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:48 PM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote: AFAIK there is one patch which landed a couple of days ago

Re: What is required to switch back to using the tip of goose ?

2014-05-16 Thread David Cheney
Oh yes, we are talking about the same thing. I'll propose a branch On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:50 PM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.com wrote: There also appears to be a small API breakage # launchpad.net/juju-core/provider/openstack provider/openstack/storage.go:59: assignment count

Re: Making juju work better with gccgo

2014-05-16 Thread John Meinel
FWIW, I wrote this little bash function and put it in my ~/.bashrc function gotest { p=-gocheck.v f= if [ -n $1 ]; then if [ $1 = -r ]; then p=./... else f=-gocheck.f=$f fi fi go test $p $f go test -compiler=gccgo $p $f } That lets my write: gotest

Re: What is required to switch back to using the tip of goose ?

2014-05-16 Thread David Cheney
FYI. This change has landed, please do the godeps dance. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.com wrote: Oh yes, we are talking about the same thing. I'll propose a branch On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:50 PM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.com wrote: There

Re: [Proposal] Requiring Go 1.2 across the board

2014-05-16 Thread Curtis Hovey-Canonical
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:44 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote: to get golang-go 1.2.* into ppa:juju/golang. I hope the people (Curtis and Ian) are still planning on configuring the new Jenkins lander as a Precise machine, since I still expect that to be the place where we are the

Re: [Proposal] Requiring Go 1.2 across the board

2014-05-16 Thread Nate Finch
+1 On May 16, 2014 3:53 AM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com wrote: +1 On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:08 PM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.com wrote: Hello, This is a proposal that we raise

Re: [Proposal] Requiring Go 1.2 across the board

2014-05-16 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
fwiw the only interim release still under support is S (along with lts releases of L, P, T). interim releases get 9 months of support, and S expires in July. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.netwrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at