Hello again.
For clarity - when you say generate manual configuration - is this going to
be a manual provider environment?
Yes, I mean manual provider environment at this point.
Where does the bootstrap server live? is this going to be a separate
service defined in your infrastructure,
On Thu Dec 18 2014 at 1:00:46 AM John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
...
9. If you want to cancel a deployment that just started you need to keep
running remove-service forever. Juju will simply ignore you if it's still
running some special bits of the charm or if you have previously
Also Azure is looks like supported , Azure pack for MSPs/ISPs are also
supported ?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-azure-pack/
From: Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr
Date: Wednesday 17 December 2014 14:23
To: juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: vCloud Director
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.tr
wrote:
Hello All
MAAS and JUJU is looks like very good product , I would like to ask as an
infrastructure will you add vCloud Director , we are vmwre vcloud air
network partner and I m thinking to integrate the juju with
Thanks
Actually I couldn¹t say I am a dev but writing some code in python , is it
enough to help you for to be part of integration and improve the speed ?
Regards
VM
From: Alexis Bruemmer alexis.bruem...@canonical.com
Date: Thursday 18 December 2014 19:55
To: Kapil Thangavelu
Yes: goal state could, I think, address this case. I'd really
appreciate more discussion on that in the Feature request: show
running relations in juju status thread -- I remain reasonably
certain that neither goal nor active is quite sufficient in
isolation, but would appreciate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All this is great work! Thanks for the write-up as well.
I think I discovered an issue with it - take a look at this bug
http://pad.lv/1403738. It seems machine.SetAgentVersion() should be
handled specially by the multi-env transaction runner, as
Fortunately all of us run an operating system with a case sensitive
file system, right ?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Horacio Duran
horacio.du...@canonical.com wrote:
Heads up people
https://github.com/blog/1938-vulnerability-announced-update-your-git-clients
apparently there is a
I dont know, some might run osx (also we have a client for windows and osx
so I dont discard that anyone might be using those tools now and then)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.com
wrote:
Fortunately all of us run an operating system with a case sensitive
Just following up. This was fixed earlier on today and the various CI
upgrade jobs are now passing. I've marked the ticket as Fix Released so
that this issue no longer blocks merges.
On 19 December 2014 at 09:40, Menno Smits menno.sm...@canonical.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 06:02, Dimiter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you for the quick response!
On 19.12.2014 06:43, Menno Smits wrote:
Just following up. This was fixed earlier on today and the various
CI upgrade jobs are now passing. I've marked the ticket as Fix
Released so that this issue no longer
11 matches
Mail list logo
