The UI Engineering team would like to let everyone know we had a release
landslide today.
First, there’s a new Juju GUI (1.3.0) release in preparation for 1.21 that
supports the new user code in 1.21. This means that when that lands the GUI
will support logging in with newly created users. The
Thanks for continued work to address bug we have log and make
jujuchrms.com and even better site. The API is also a welcome update
too.
-Antonio
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Rick Harding
rick.hard...@canonical.com wrote:
The UI Engineering team would like to let everyone know we had a
So the main caveats as I see them are:
1) since it didn't come from an official source we flag it as such (the
mechanism was originally developed to allow developers to test out their
in-progress code changes). So your version numbers I juju status won't
exactly match
2) if you ever need to
A small update to this, I just landed a PR which allows you to filter out
these tests if you're only interested in short-running unit-style tests.
From the package godoc
https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/master/featuretests/doc.go#L20:
To run tests excluding the functional tests in this package,
Hey everyone,
There's currently quite a few version of juju available [0] from various
sources (cloud archive, ubuntu archive, stable ppa, source). While I know
the release team is doing a great job in making sure that versions of juju
are consistent across platforms, it's inevitable that users
+1
On Jan 14, 2015 12:54 PM, Marco Ceppi marco.ce...@canonical.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
There's currently quite a few version of juju available [0] from various
sources (cloud archive, ubuntu archive, stable ppa, source). While I know
the release team is doing a great job in making sure that
Thanks guys for answering me.
It would be great that the generic vhost-config-relation allows lets the
related charm to require certain parameters.
Do you think that it would be a good improvement for the apache2 charm?
Regards,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Charles Butler
Testing is no new topic to the list and the ecosystem at large. We've
discussed and hashed out required testing for a while, over several UDS,
vUDS, and emails. Each time we discuss this testing garners a swelling
response, a large portion of +1s from charmers and community alike, and the
