Re: Charmers membership request!

And my axe! Er, I mean, +1! On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Konstantinos Tsakalozos < kos.tsakalo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Thank you both for the vote of confidence. Lets go charming! > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Kevin Monroe > wrote: > >> Since last

Re: Apache Drill Charm

Yeah, we should see if we can do the same with YARN... 2016-06-01 14:42 GMT+02:00 Marco Ceppi : > +1 to using % logic to make it scale across any sized instance. Awesome > stuff! > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:28 AM Tom Barber wrote: > >> Okay

Re: Apache Drill Charm

+1 to using % logic to make it scale across any sized instance. Awesome stuff! On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:28 AM Tom Barber wrote: > Okay latest "stable" build has RAM config options. > > Drill ships with defaults of 8GB and 3GB but I didn't want it to die on > EC2 Large

Re: Apache Drill Charm

Okay latest "stable" build has RAM config options. Drill ships with defaults of 8GB and 3GB but I didn't want it to die on EC2 Large etc boxes that dont have that much. So I added a bit of logic, you can (I hope) add XXG and it will use that fixed amount, or you can, as it ships, tell it you want

Re: User Mgmt - 2.0 and Beyond

Yes, this is super interesting. Thanks! On 01/06/16 10:58, James Beedy wrote: > I've "conjured-up" what I think would be a great enhancement to the current > user mgmt capability in 2.0. > > As things stand, one can add a user to a model, and set a permission category > of either read

Re: User Mgmt - 2.0 and Beyond

Good start. I would add * external AAA connectivity (LDAP/AD) to find where the actual data is stored. * add user to units only (no access to Juju) * share ++ Sam -- Samuel Cozannet Cloud, Big Data and IoT Strategy Team Business Development - Cloud and ISV Ecosystem Changing the Future of

User Mgmt - 2.0 and Beyond

I've "conjured-up" what I think would be a great enhancement to the current user mgmt capability in 2.0. As things stand, one can add a user to a model, and set a permission category of either read (read), or write (read/write). This functionality is awesome, and a huge step for juju

User Mgmt - 2.0 and Beyond

I've "conjured-up" what I think would be a great enhancement to the current user mgmt capability in 2.0. As things stand, one can add a user to a model, and set a permission category of either read (read), or write (read/write). This functionality is awesome, and a huge step for juju

Re: Anything providing Zookeeper?

Yeah I saw that on the Drill list, apologies for not mentioning that earlier! :) RAM config in the charm will be available shortly, although I've got a meeting in 5 minutes so it'll probably be an hour or so. -- Director Meteorite.bi - Saiku Analytics Founder Tel: +44(0)5603641316

Re: Anything providing Zookeeper?

Thanks for this Charm! I've sent it to my colleagues who are working with Drill. We got a lot better performance by storing the data in Parquet format. Drill wasn't able to distribute the queries because the data was stored as json in HDFS. 2016-05-31 17:29 GMT+02:00 Tom Barber

Re: Subordinate charms

Hello, What is then the recommendation for monitoring / logging / (...) agents that run independently on the units and are loosely connected to the local charms, but potentially still need to know about the apps running? Wouldn´t colocation make them cumbersome? Still encoded as subordinate

Re: Charmers membership request!

Thank you both for the vote of confidence. Lets go charming! On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Kevin Monroe wrote: > Since last December, I've been on 18 tours through the Review Queue with > Kostas. We've seen the good, the bad, and a little bit of ugly together. >