On 18 November 2014 09:25, Marco Ceppi ma...@ondina.co wrote:
I have a few charms that expect /mnt to be the ephemeral disk, while it
wouldn't be a huge headache and I certainly wouldn't want to stand in the
way of progress. It won't be trivial and I'll start to devise a way to test
all the
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:58 PM, David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Marco Ceppi ma...@ondina.co wrote:
I have a few charms that expect /mnt to be the ephemeral disk, while it
wouldn't be a huge headache and I certainly
I'm in the same boat,
On 19 November 2014 09:50, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Ideally that would not be /mnt, because otherwise we're going to end up
with a lot of charms that cannot be co-located. My point is that it can be
/mnt, and your charm will keep working without any changes to hooks.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Stuart Bishop stuart.bis...@canonical.com
wrote:
On 19 November 2014 09:50, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com
wrote:
Ideally that would not be /mnt, because otherwise we're going to end up
with a lot of charms that cannot be co-located. My point
I have a few charms that expect /mnt to be the ephemeral disk, while it
wouldn't be a huge headache and I certainly wouldn't want to stand in the
way of progress. It won't be trivial and I'll start to devise a way to test
all the charms so we can get a count of charms that expect /mnt to exist.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Marco Ceppi ma...@ondina.co wrote:
I have a few charms that expect /mnt to be the ephemeral disk, while it
wouldn't be a huge headache and I certainly wouldn't want to stand in the
way of progress. It won't be trivial and I'll start to devise a way to test
+smoser
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on introducing storage as a first-class primitive in Juju.
Charms will be able to indicate that they require storage (block devices,
filesystems...), and when you deploy that
