Re: juju 1.20.0 and future plans.

2014-04-18 Thread John Meinel
Well, there is Won't Fix to close them, or there is set them to Low which allows for an acknowledgement that it could be fixed, but just not now. I prefer the Low version myself, as number of Open bugs has never been a concern for me. I do agree that we want a better view of what we are actually

juju 1.20.0 and future plans.

2014-04-17 Thread Curtis Hovey-Canonical
NOW I moved a lot of bugs from 1.19.1 to 1.20.0 to make it easier to see out immediate priorities. If we fix a bug in a future milestone I will retarget it to the current goal. The intent is to make is clear what must be fixed verses issues that may be fixed. Their are about 20 issues I *think*

Re: juju 1.20.0 and future plans.

2014-04-17 Thread David Cheney
Excellent writeup. I agree with your conclusions -- we must reduce the number of open issues, not reclassify them. My vote has always been to close an issue that we cannot realistically fix in the next cycle, but I understand this has always been unpopular. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Curtis