On 21/01/2014, Curtis Hovey-Canonical cur...@canonical.com wrote:
I believe milestone 1.17.1 has about 4 weeks of issues targeted to it.
https://launchpad.net/juju-core/+milestone/1.17.1
I have retargetted all bugs that are not actually landed or about to
land on trunk against the new
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Jonathan Aquilina jaquil...@eagleeyet.net
wrote:
I have an interesting scenario which either is already catered for or
should
be catered for.
I am currently using a local provider for testing and contribution
purposes.
I bootstrapped an environment and
That sounds awesome.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on changing the local provider so that sudo is not needed from
outside Juju; juju bootstrap and juju destroy-environment will prompt
as necessary.
I would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-01-22 06:12 PM, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
I would like to also prevent Juju from allowing the user to run
with sudo from the outside. This will allow us to remove all of the
code pathways that change ownership to the sudo caller, and avoid
Thank you! Let's get rid of every chown in the code base.
On 22 January 2014 23:12, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on changing the local provider so that sudo is not needed from
outside Juju; juju bootstrap and juju destroy-environment will prompt as
Thank you Martin.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Martin Packman
martin.pack...@canonical.com wrote:
I have retargetted all bugs that are not actually landed or about to
land on trunk against the new 1.18.0 milestone. This should mean we
can get a 1.17.1 release done, as desired.
In
I am dismayed to see that juju 1.17.0 was put into trusty. We know it
is not backward compatible. Since the juju stable PPA only contains
backports from trusty, there is no juju stable package for me to
install through an archive.
A sad day for me to respond to a production-level issue with
James/Scott/Pat? Long term goal is to sync with whatever is latest stable
before release, no?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical cur...@canonical.com
wrote:
I am dismayed to see that juju 1.17.0 was put into trusty. We know it
is not backward
The core local provider changes have been merged now. For a summary of how
the local provider bootstraps now, see:
https://codereview.appspot.com/55880043/
I removed this bits that chown to the user from the local provider. I
can't, unfortunately, easily remove the only other remaining part:
