I just proposed this branch:
http://code.launchpad.net/~jameinel/juju-core/login-returns-env-tag/+merge/221021
This will make it so that we end up caching the environment UUID into our
ENV.jenv file, and passing it up when we try to connect, and having it
validated to match the running
On 27 May 2014 04:02, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
On 23/05/14 02:47, roger peppe wrote:
Any particular reason to wrap the errgo functions rather than using errgo
directly? Personally, I see the role of the errors package to be about
specific error classifications (something that
On 27 May 2014 07:55, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
I just proposed this branch:
http://code.launchpad.net/~jameinel/juju-core/login-returns-env-tag/+merge/221021
This will make it so that we end up caching the environment UUID into our
ENV.jenv file, and passing it up when we try
They are/were hard-coding CACert and control-bucket (because they can). I
believe they tried dropping control-bucket and then ended up getting locked
out of their Canonistack account (not necessarily more than random
correlation, but I believe it spooked off Curtis from making that change
again).
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Ian Booth ian.bo...@canonical.com wrote:
PS. I still don't know the arch name for PPC64el tools. CI is
createing ppc64el and ppc64 each time it sees the former. My
deployment to stilson-06 implies ppc63el is ignored, the arch has to
be ppc64
The expected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-05-27 02:55 AM, John Meinel wrote:
I just proposed this branch:
http://code.launchpad.net/~jameinel/juju-core/login-returns-env-tag/+merge/221021
This will make it so that we end up caching the environment UUID
into our ENV.jenv file, and
On 27/05/14 16:09, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
The alpha beta support affects packaging.and tools naming. This chagne
should have been discussed with Juju QA before landing. CI cannot make
a package or extract tools.
http://juju-ci.vapour.ws:8080/job/publish-revision/415/console
We
Roger
We have had many long discussions, and you have provided much valuable
input: in particular, explaining to us that we were completely off-base re:
the attempts to use a slice vs a linked list in the error stacks. And we
did indeed agree to use errgo (as the only proposed implementation that
On 28/05/14 12:43, Nate Finch wrote:
This sounds like one of those if you have to ask this question, you're
doing something wrong.
Can you give an example of where we need this?
Sure... let's say we have a stack of errors, for simplicity of the
argument lets say it is a slice of error
On 28/05/14 13:31, Nate Finch wrote:
If you're talking about errgo, if all we care about is transition, but
not what the actual types are, we could just record in the list when we
mask the type.
We could, but that would mean walking the list every time you want to
check the cause. It would
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.comwrote:
On 28/05/14 12:43, Nate Finch wrote:
This sounds like one of those if you have to ask this question, you're
doing something wrong.
Can you give an example of where we need this?
Sure... let's say we have a stack
On 28/05/14 13:48, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com
mailto:tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
On 28/05/14 12:43, Nate Finch wrote:
This sounds like one of those if you have to ask this question,
you're
doing something
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.comwrote:
On 28/05/14 13:48, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com
mailto:tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
On 28/05/14 12:43, Nate Finch wrote:
This sounds like
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:39 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.comwrote:
The address of the real value is the same.
Are you referring to the backing array? That is not what is being compared,
so that's not a useful property.
John
=:-
On May 28, 2014 6:04 AM, Andrew Wilkins
I think we need concrete examples which Tim should have in the test suite.
John
=:-
On May 28, 2014 6:50 AM, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:39 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.comwrote:
The address of the real value is the same.
Are you
On 28/05/14 15:48, John Meinel wrote:
I think we need concrete examples which Tim should have in the test suite.
John
=:-
On May 28, 2014 6:50 AM, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com
mailto:andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:39 AM, John Meinel
16 matches
Mail list logo
