Re: Bug 1642609: new model config defaults

2016-12-13 Thread Aaron Bentley
On 2016-12-07 03:37 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > I am strongly of the opinion that at the very least a newly created > model should be capable of deploying workloads, which means that at > least a subset of model-config options should be propagated by default > to new models. This means at least,

Re: Bug 1642609: new model config defaults

2016-12-08 Thread Michael Foord
I created bug 1648426 to track discussion of which model config options should (if indeed any...) propagate by default. https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1648426 Michael On 07/12/16 21:37, Michael Foord wrote: Hey all, I spent far longer than was reasonable working out why OIL were

Bug 1642609: new model config defaults

2016-12-07 Thread Michael Foord
Hey all, I spent far longer than was reasonable working out why OIL were unable to deploy workloads with juju 2.0.2 from the proposed stream. https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1642609 The repro of the bug involved bootstrapping a xenial controller creating several new models and