On 2016-07-11 11:57 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 11/07/16 09:26, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> But is this week really any different from any other week? Won't there
>> always be something critical that has to land?
>
> I think it's fine to make it a plan that we will have Windows tests on
> for
On 11/07/16 09:26, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> But is this week really any different from any other week? Won't there
> always be something critical that has to land?
I think it's fine to make it a plan that we will have Windows tests on
for 2.0 GA, but at the moment we're focused on all the breaking
On 2016-07-10 08:34 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
> Turning on gating for Windows tests before all tests were passing is premature
> and is now blocking us from landing critical fixes for beta12 that we need to
> release this week for inclusion into xenial.
Hey, this is why I pointed out that it would
Turning on gating for Windows tests before all tests were passing is premature
and is now blocking us from landing critical fixes for beta12 that we need to
release this week for inclusion into xenial. With the race tests, we got all of
those passing before turning on gating. We need to do the
Hi Juju developers,
As requested by juju-core, we have added --race and Windows unit tests
to gated landings. These tests are run concurrently, not sequentially,
but all must complete before code can be landed.
As a practical matter, this means that landings are now impossible until
the Windows
