Greetings,
I wanted to bring attention to a pending MR
https://code.launchpad.net/~evarlast/charm-helpers/use-no-install-recommends/+merge/242270
which I feel can help charm-helpers.
By not installing recommended packages, charms will install packages
faster, with less unneeded packages.
This le
It may be worth mentioning that even if you didn't create the charm or
write the amulet tests this may effect you. If you are trying to
update a charm, even with an entirely unrelated feature, your proposed
changes will not be accepted until tests pass.
It is up to us as the unrelated feature auth
.
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ping me on irc (jrwren)
or via email and I will do my best to help in any way I can.
Thank you all for your patience and understanding.
--
Jay Wren
Juju UI Engineering
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubs
again.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Jay Wren wrote:
> This morning the Juju UI Engineering team noticed that ingestion from
> launchpad.net to jujucharms.com has not been working since December
> 17th.
>
> The issue is critical and the team is investigating immediately. At
> th
StrictHostKeyChecking and shipping the public key of the ssh host with
the charm does seem to meet the criteria of verifying the intended
source.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Matt Bruzek
wrote:
> I recently reviewed a charm that is using sftp to download the binary files
> with a username an
. For non-production use,
the ondrej/apache2 PPA works very well.
--
Jay Wren
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Robin Winslow wrote:
> I spent the weekend playing around with getting mod_http2
> <https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_http2.html> working in Apache2
&g
Clicking that URL and reading the InRelease file, you can see that the
mirror at http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/mariadb/repo/5.5/ubuntu/ does not have
ppc64el packages.
A quick search at packages.ubuntu.com shows that trusty has mariadb 5.5
packaged.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=mariadb&s
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Charles Butler <
charles.but...@canonical.com> wrote:
> - There is currently no way to disable TLS wrapped endpoints on Etcd (we
> want to keep our coordination data secure don't we?)
>
>
For our use case, we consider the overhead of establishing a new TLS
connecti
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Casey Marshall <
casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote:
> The overhead of a TLS handshake can be minimal, it just depends on the
> algorithm & key lengths used. This should be configurable in the layer, I
> think. EC and 2048-bit RSA have reasonable handshake times.
If it helps, the charm set command supports arbitrary key values to be
stored in extra-info in the charm store.
e.g.
$ charm set cs:~evarlast/trusty/parse-server-0 layer-x=rev1 layer-y=rev2
Then this will be displayed in extrainfo:
$ charm show cs:~containers/trusty/swarm extra-info
extra-info:
Hello Merlijn,
I can replicate the problem and I can work around it by using a faster
internet connection.
At some point, tcp connections have to time out. I can only replicate the
issue when that timeout is reached. If you have the means to relocate to a
faster internet connection temporarily fo
; what exactly goes wrong here?
>
> Also, now that I think of it, the resource upload command might also be
> affected by this, if it uses the same library and similar backend
> infrastructure? I'll test this out.
>
>
> Op maandag 20 juni 2016 heeft Jay Wren het
> volgend
ad, system monitor shows ~400KiB/s.
>>>>
>>>> This causes me to think there is more at play here then large file +
>>>> slow internet... Let me know if I can help to further debug this problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As an asid
Could you expand on the resource-get inefficiencies?
The resource-get docs say this:
If "resource-get" for a resource has not been run before (for the unit)
>
> then the resource is downloaded from the controller at the revision
>
> associated with the unit's application. That file is stored in t
,
--
Jay
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> On 21 June 2016 at 02:40, Jay Wren wrote:
> > Thanks for the further testing.
> >
> > Now I'm questioning how in the world I was able to see the same error.
> >
> > I will continue my tes
With an accepted minimum value, it seems like $COLUMNS or `stty size` could
be used for variable width status output based on the current terminal
window.
Does the interest in this thread warrant that complexity?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Rick Harding
wrote:
> 15 seems a bit large. Jame
+1 its a workaround rather than a feature.
Can we allow publishing charms without resources? This simplifies things
for the charm author for the cases that the charm resource cannot be
uploaded to charmstore.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Gabriel Samfira <
gsamf...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrot
Hello,
I have recently had the need to replace an apache2 ssl termination and
proxy/rewrite reverse proxy system with haproxy. I was hoping I'd be able
to configure the haproxy charm to do all the things that we were doing with
apache2 and its vhost_https_template config. All seemed to work well (
The charm is promulgated and thus its write permissions are set to only
"charmers".
Will a member of charmers please set bugs-url for Merlijn?
Alternatively, you could update a different charm, set its bugs-url and ask
for it to be promulgated.
--
Jay
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Merlijn Se
I was under the impression that `juju run --unit` does run in a hook
context. In fact, the help for `juju help run` explicitly says:
```
Commands run for applications or units are executed in a 'hook context' for
the unit.
```
A quick test:
```
> juju run --unit u4/0 'echo $JUJU_UNIT_NAME'
u4/0
I do not understand how this works. Could someone with knowledge of how
jujud on a controller communicates with jujud agents on units describe how
that is done?
My limited understanding must be wrong give that James has this working.
This is what I thought:
On most cloud providers: add-machine
21 matches
Mail list logo
