Facebook's Kaggle competition has a dataset with ~7.6e6 rows with 9 columns
(mostly
strings). https://www.kaggle.com/c/facebook-recruiting-iv-human-or-bot/data
Loading the dataset in R using read.csv takes 5 minutes and the resulting
dataframe takes 0.6GB (RStudio takes a total of 1.6GB memory
Adding the export failed with the same error.
error during bootstrap:
LoadError(at sysimg.jl line 278: LoadError(at constants.jl line 94:
Base.AssertionError(msg=Float64(π) == Float64(big(π)
On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 8:59:32 PM UTC-7, Seth wrote:
Nope:
error during bootstrap:
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Andreas Lobinger lobing...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello colleague,
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 1:00:54 PM UTC+2, Jameson wrote:
The dlopen API in base changed last week and I have not had time to update
Gtk.jl accordingly. I should be able to get back to soon
I can't figure this out, and I don't see any smoking gun.
I have a test:
@test round(y[1:3],4) ==
round([122.10760591498584, 159.0072453120582, 176.39547945994505], 4)
that is working fine on my 5-day-old master (and on 0.3.9), but is failing
on travis-nightly with
ERROR: LoadError:
Looking at this some more, it appears that #11356
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/11356 may be the culprit.
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 1:22:55 PM UTC-7, Seth wrote:
I can't figure this out, and I don't see any smoking gun.
I have a test:
@test round(y[1:3],4) ==
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 5:41:29 PM UTC+2, Tim Holy wrote:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/1334
Ah.
Which could/should be raised in this v0.3/0.4/0.5 discussion. I see so many
new features started, but basic error reporting should be rock-steady
first. Before trying to give
If you're using julia 0.3, you might want to try current master and/or
possibly the ob/gctune branch.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10428
Best,
--Tim
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 09:50:03 AM verylucky...@gmail.com wrote:
Facebook's Kaggle competition has a dataset with ~7.6e6 rows with
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Tom Lee m...@tomlee.id.au wrote:
No, in that example you create an anonymous function. I'm not certain on the
semantics, but n effectively points to this nameless function. Anonymous
functions are not as fast as generic ones (at least in 0.3, at least
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/1334
--Tim
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:32:04 AM Yichao Yu wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Andreas Lobinger lobing...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello colleague,
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 1:00:54 PM UTC+2, Jameson wrote:
The dlopen API in base
Hello colleague,
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 2:37:14 PM UTC+2, Tobias Knopp wrote:
Andreas,
unfortunately the Gtk/Winston/Cairo thing got a little unstable during the
last months. I tried two days a Winston/Gtk example and ran into the
Graphics issue.
in my native language we have an
Hi
I am using the dsplp subroutine (Linear Programming) from LINPACK. It is
also in FORTRAN and I made a simple interface to use it in Julia. Although
the data format used internally by the dsplp subroutine is diferent, I made
the following function in julia to emulate the linpro package from
Not ideal, but for now you can try turning off the garbage collection while
reading in the DataFrame.
gc_disable()
df = DataFrames.readtable(bids.csv)
gc_enable()
Thanks,
Jiahao Chen
Research Scientist
MIT CSAIL
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Tim Holy tim.h...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're
El domingo, 31 de mayo de 2015, 19:52:34 (UTC+2), andrew cooke escribió:
And we already have a rename. Now known as
https://github.com/andrewcooke/ParComb.jl
How about ParserCombinator.jl?
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 11:16:43 UTC-3, andrew cooke wrote:
There's a new parser library
Hi.
One of my students is solving some large sparse systems (more than 20K
equations). The coeficient matrix
is symmetric and positive definite, with large sparsivity (1% of non zero
elements in some cases).
After playing around a little bit with cholfact we decided to compare the
time with
The problem might lie in the round function, as evident with
julia-0.4.0-bfa86480b8 (linux64) like so:
round([1], 1)
ERROR: TypeError: non-boolean (Array{Bool,1}) used in boolean context
in round at floatfuncs.jl:143
in round at floatfuncs.jl:139
The following also doesn't work:
julia
Hey Scott,
Just bumped across an old IJulia Notebook my 9-year old and I did last
year. He was getting '24' problems (use +,-,*,/ with 4 numbers to make 24)
and got one he swore couldn't be solved. We put together a little
brute-force solver to test that out -- he was right.
The problem appears to be in the recently introduced check to isfinite
(line 143), which turns an array of things into an array of bool.
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 2:53:48 PM UTC-7, MeQuerSat wrote:
The problem might lie in the round function, as evident with
julia-0.4.0-bfa86480b8 (linux64)
I'll concede that if you know the function name at runtime, Mauro's
solution may be a little cleaner, especially if it will be called a lot.
There are plenty of examples in Base of @eval being used to define
functions, such as lines 11-18
here:
yeah, that might be better. i need to make dinner, but if i can't think of
a reason not to by the time i have some more time, i guess i'll move
again. thanks, andrew
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 19:03:29 UTC-3, David P. Sanders wrote:
El domingo, 31 de mayo de 2015, 19:52:34 (UTC+2), andrew
The problem appears to be in the recently introduced check to isinf (line
143), which turns an array of things into an array of bool.
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 2:53:48 PM UTC-7, MeQuerSat wrote:
The problem might lie in the round function, as evident with
julia-0.4.0-bfa86480b8 (linux64)
OK https://github.com/andrewcooke/ParserCombinator.jl
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 19:03:29 UTC-3, David P. Sanders wrote:
El domingo, 31 de mayo de 2015, 19:52:34 (UTC+2), andrew cooke escribió:
And we already have a rename. Now known as
https://github.com/andrewcooke/ParComb.jl
How
Following up on an earlier discussion that I started in this newsgroup, I
have written a small package that provides a routine to modify a field of
an immutable object in the case that the object is inside a container.
Please refer to:
https://github.com/StephenVavasis/Modifyfield.jl
I have now implemented a solution that follows Mauro's basic outline. The
difference is that the heavy lifting in my code is done at compile-time
instead of run-time so that modifyField! will have good performance even in
an inner loop. Please see my announcement soon to be posted on
Great, when I get back to the States I'll show that to my son Alex... BTW,
his science project when very well... I'll have to put up a gist with what
he wrote... totally trivial, he just learned string interpolation, julia
for loop syntax, print/println, using vectors, and using things like sum
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 3:10:33 AM UTC+1, Jameson wrote:
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 7:59:20 PM ele...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 1:25:15 AM UTC+11, Simon Danisch wrote:
Someone else has to answer this. I suppose it's not that bad. The
immutables
And we already have a rename. Now known as
https://github.com/andrewcooke/ParComb.jl
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 11:16:43 UTC-3, andrew cooke wrote:
There's a new parser library for Julia 0.3 and 0.4 -
https://github.com/andrewcooke/SimpleParser.jl
It's got some rough edges that I hope to
sub! Just what I was looking for! it works like a charm
On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 3:35:50 PM UTC-7, Tim Holy wrote:
Not tested, but
xsub = sub(x, 10:20)
Base.LinAlg.axpy!(a, y, xsub)
should work just fine.
--Tim
On Saturday, May 30, 2015 02:35:01 PM Gabriel Goh wrote:
Hey
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 3:13:47 PM UTC+10, Alex Ames wrote:
I lost multiple days attempting to pin down this behavior. I had something
along the lines of
x = a + b
+ c
It's not clear to me why the second line is a valid expression. At the
very least, it would be nice for lint to
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 7:13:47 AM UTC+2, Alex Ames wrote:
I lost multiple days attempting to pin down this behavior. I had something
along the lines of
x = a + b
+ c
It's not clear to me why the second line is a valid expression. At the
very least, it would be nice for lint to
Thanks.
A similar color palette is available at
https://github.com/JuliaLang/Color.jl/issues/92
Thanks,
Jiahao Chen
Research Scientist
MIT CSAIL
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Li Zhang fff...@gmail.com wrote:
hi folks,
i run into a lot of color usage lately, and always wanted to have a
Le dimanche 31 mai 2015 à 02:30 -0700, Andreas Lobinger a écrit :
Hello colleagues,
i'd like to do some GUI related things with julia and thought hey,
i'm doing quite nice things with pygtk, so let's try here also and
looked into Gtk.jl. Gtk.jl which is (seems to be) part of the official
Hi,
I have an image
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-9pDJ9d88xQE/VWrYIj8DHrI/AAY/BOicf_WwYhs/s1600/SampleStain.jpg
This is the matlab code for plotting the bounding.
[y,x] = ind2sub(size(msk), find(msk));
coord = [x, y];
mc = min(coord)-0.5
Mc = max(coord)+0.5
rect=[mc Mc-mc]
Hello colleague,
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 12:24:21 PM UTC+2, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le dimanche 31 mai 2015 à 02:30 -0700, Andreas Lobinger a écrit :
I've forked a Gtk.jl to my githup presence and git cloned this to my local
copy, where i use a branch.
The LibDL_problem (dirty)
The dlopen API in base changed last week and I have not had time to update
Gtk.jl accordingly. I should be able to get back to soon however.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:24 PM Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr
wrote:
Le dimanche 31 mai 2015 à 02:30 -0700, Andreas Lobinger a écrit :
Hello
Hello colleague,
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 1:00:54 PM UTC+2, Jameson wrote:
The dlopen API in base changed last week and I have not had time to update
Gtk.jl accordingly. I should be able to get back to soon however.
this was also my first guess, and that you work on your package is
I'd disagree strongly with the recommendation to break expressions after...
it makes you have to look at the end of the line above to see
if a line is part of another expression.
I think it is much better to simply get used to wrapping things with ( ),
and editors show you nicely where the
Hello colleagues,
i'd like to do some GUI related things with julia and thought hey, i'm
doing quite nice things with pygtk, so let's try here also and looked into
Gtk.jl. Gtk.jl which is (seems to be) part of the official julialang
repository on githup. So my expectation is: This is working.
There must be a solution :-)
I tried a similar build yesterday, but ran out of disk space over night on
a 16Gb sdcard. Has anyone managed to do cross-compilation?
It could be worth it to try configure options similar to what is mentioned
here (probably with cortex-a7 instead):
It would seem that they must be forcing on codegen with -mattrs=+vfp, but I
didn't think you could do that at compile time.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:14 AM Viral Shah vi...@mayin.org wrote:
:-(
I wonder what’s the magic incantation those LLVM binaries use.
-viral
On 31-May-2015, at 9:29
I've shared an item with you:
Proposal for JSoC'15 by Rohit Kashyap
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SrNgmK-GUsxLzxwKwjHWzPzB9Vj53vsIqSH41MRBe34/edit?usp=sharing
It's not an attachment – it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
Hi,
Greetings to all mentors, I
Hi,
Greetings to all mentors, I request you to go through this Proposal draft
and submit your feedback/suggestions for improvements before submission
deadline.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SrNgmK-GUsxLzxwKwjHWzPzB9Vj53vsIqSH41MRBe34/edit?usp=sharing
Le dimanche 31 mai 2015 à 04:12 -0700, Andreas Lobinger a écrit :
Hello colleague,
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 1:00:54 PM UTC+2, Jameson wrote:
The dlopen API in base changed last week and I have not had
time to update Gtk.jl accordingly. I should be able to get
back
Since you don't provide msk nor display the value of rect, it's hard to say.
BTW, in julia you can say
mc = minimum(coord, 1)
--Tim
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 02:45:53 AM fshussa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have an image
Andreas,
unfortunately the Gtk/Winston/Cairo thing got a little unstable during the
last months. I tried two days a Winston/Gtk example and ran into the
Graphics issue. I think this shows that (unfortunately) the user base of
Gtk is still low. It would IMHO help to Winston rely on Gtk (i.e.
A document that is accessible without google log-in would raise the
probability for comments...
Actually, it's name is n:
julia function getfn()
return function(); 1; end
end
getfn (generic function with 1 method)
julia const n = getfn()
(anonymous function)
julia n()
1
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:09 PM, David P. Sanders dpsand...@gmail.com
wrote:
El domingo, 31 de mayo
No, in that example you create an anonymous function. I'm not certain on
the semantics, but n effectively points to this nameless function.
Anonymous functions are not as fast as generic ones (at least in 0.3, at
least sometimes) and you cannot add new methods to them for multiple
dispatch (as
We now have a sheet to help JuliaCon attendees arrange for room sharing:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1361VHhtFM5Cnu-S_cSUKFeUhrH33FepOKLCc0YLtosg/edit?usp=sharing
On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 5:34:52 PM UTC+2, Matt Bauman wrote:
Is anyone interested in splitting a room with two
There's a new parser library for Julia 0.3 and 0.4 -
https://github.com/andrewcooke/SimpleParser.jl
It's got some rough edges that I hope to clean up in the next week or so,
with a first release probably next weekend.
Bug reports welcome.
It's parser combinator style, but uses trampolining
49 matches
Mail list logo
