[julia-users] Re: ANN: ParallelAccelerator v0.2 for Julia 0.5 released.

Not speaking on behalf of the ParallelAccelerator team - but the long term future of ParallelAccelerator in my opinion is to do exactly that - keep pushing on new things and get them (code or ideas) merged into Base as they stabilize. Without the ParallelAccelerator team pushing us,

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Book --- Julia Programming for Operations Research

I have had others also tell me that they really love this book. Great work Kwon! -viral On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:59:58 AM UTC+5:30, cdm wrote: > > > now on file at our State of California agency library ... > >http://www.energy.ca.gov/library/index.html > > > > Thank You, C. Kwon

[julia-users] Julia in top 50 on the TIOBE index

Perhaps many of you have already seen this, but Julia enters top 50 on the TIOBE index for the first time! In fact their September headline is exactly that and they believe it will only get better in the coming few months! That might just line up well with Julia 1.0 next year.

[julia-users] Re: newest stable version of julia on EC2 AWS instances - starcluster

You should use the generic linux tarballs. The ubuntu binaries are no longer maintained, which is why they are not listed on the downloads page, and instead buried deeper on the platforms page. Perhaps we should remove them altogether. -viral On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 5:51:33 AM

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

g first > and the @everywhere using. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2 Sep 2016, at 17:29, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote: > > You do not need @everywhere. `using` will load on all nodes. > > -viral > > On Friday, September 2, 2016 at 2:39:34 PM UTC+5:30, Pauli

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

Created JuliaPy and sent the invites to authors and contributors of various py*.jl packages. -viral On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:32:34 PM UTC+5:30, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > Viral, can you set up JuliaPy and send invites to the relevant people? >

[julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

Hi Luthaf, Sorry to hear that you are not using Julia anymore. Hopefully you will come back in the future. I am wondering if we should create a JuliaPy organization and move many important building blocks and python wrapper packages there, if the various authors think it is a good idea.

[julia-users] Re: Thread problem in 0.5.0-rc3+0

Pretty sure this hasn't been tried - but do submit an issue. -viral On Friday, September 2, 2016 at 10:03:34 PM UTC+5:30, jean-pierre both wrote: > > The problem occurs when a function having a threaded loop calling another > function with > a threaded loop inside. > > here is a code sample

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

he power machine? > > I think the long term solution is to have a test server running power > machine to flag that the package did not compile successfully to the power > port. > > -paulito > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote: > &

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

ations behind but is >> there a way to manually compile and install the local package downloaded >> after you edit some files to make it work for the power machine? >> >> I think the long term solution is to have a test server running power >> machine to flag that the p

Re: [julia-users] Is the master algorithm on the roadmap?

I agree with John here. This is totally unacceptable, and is making the experience poorer for others. -viral On Friday, September 2, 2016 at 8:48:44 PM UTC+5:30, John Myles White wrote: > > May I also point out to the My settings button on your top right corner > >> My topic email

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

h}})() > at ./multi.jl:1421 > From worker 16: in > run_work_thunk(::Base.##625#627{Base.CallMsg{:call_fetch}}, ::Bool) at > ./multi.jl:1001 > From worker 16: in macro expansion at ./multi.jl:1421 [inlined] > From worker 16: in > (::Base

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

I should point out that the linalg tests are expected to fail for now, since we are awaiting a new openblas release, which is known to fix these issues. -viral On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 10:26:38 AM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote: > > I have uploaded Julia-0.5 on Power8 binarie

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

further issues here (and we can open new issues if they turn out to be new): https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/18258 -viral On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 10:26:38 AM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote: > > I have uploaded Julia-0.5 on Power8 binaries here. These are built with > t

Re: [julia-users] Differential Equations Package

ns > around). > > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 3:24:25 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > Chris, Thanks for consolidating efforts and setting things up to set up a > community for all kinds of differential equations. > > I wonder if we should have a DiffEq channel/room on the julia

Re: [julia-users] Differential Equations Package

Chris, Thanks for consolidating efforts and setting things up to set up a community for all kinds of differential equations. I wonder if we should have a DiffEq channel/room on the julia gitter rather than a new gitter? Just a thought. For now, many projects do have their own gitter - like

Re: [julia-users] Differential Equations Package

Perhaps JuliaMath is a good place for now. That is what I am going to suggest. On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 12:45:54 PM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote: > > That's right. Perhaps we need a JuliaDiffEq organization to collect > various ODE, PDE, FEM related packages. > > -viral >

Re: [julia-users] Differential Equations Package

That's right. Perhaps we need a JuliaDiffEq organization to collect various ODE, PDE, FEM related packages. -viral On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 11:31:04 PM UTC+5:30, Mauro wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 17:13, Chris Rackauckas wrote: > ... > > Thanks for helping me get

[julia-users] ANN: 0.5.0-rc3 now available

Quoting Tony's earlier message: Release candidate 3 is now available: https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang/bin/linux/x64/0.5/julia-0.5.0-rc3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang/bin/linux/x86/0.5/julia-0.5.0-rc3-linux-i686.tar.gz

[julia-users] ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc3 now available

Reposting Tony's message about RC3 in a new thread with an updated subject line. -viral On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 9:00:30 PM UTC+5:30, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Release candidate 3 is now available: > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang/bin/linux/x64/0.5/julia-0.5.0-rc3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

19, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote: > > I am getting successful builds on the OSU Power8 machine. Once openblas has a > new release, I suspect we can provide pre-packaged power8 binaries. > > I am building on CentOS 7 and this is what lscpu

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

-79 NUMA node8 CPU(s): 80-159 I suspect you are running into a codegen issue. Let’s give it a few days and once llvm 3.9 releases, we can try that. If not, we may need Jameson’s help. -viral > On Aug 19, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote: > > It is h

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

It is hard to say what is happening there. Trying it out. OpenBLAS develop branch is now passing on Power and hence Atlas should no longer be required. Note that you need the latest (3.10.4?) ATLAS, but in any case, this should not affect the build. -viral > On Aug 18, 2016, at 7:03 PM,

[julia-users] Announcing 0.5.0-rc0 and binaries available

Hello everyone, You may have noticed 0.5.0-rc0 being tagged last week. The binaries are now all ready and available for testing. This is a good point for package developers to make their packages ready for 0.5, and for users to test their codes on the new release.

[julia-users] Re: Combining @parallel and @threads

As soon as @threads is stable enough for wide usage, @parallel should automatically do @threads on every compute node. For now, we should certainly try to get this to work. If not in this form, with a different macro like @parallelthreads or something. -viral On Saturday, July 30, 2016 at

[julia-users] Re: Julia at the SIAM Annual Conference

Alan and I stopped by a couple of times. We did sponsor bags and flyers - but were unable to have a booth this year with many of us travelling after juliacon. -viral On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 8:36:44 PM UTC-4, Sheehan Olver wrote: > > Julia Computing sponsored the bags. Though I was

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

just keep pushing julia on other architectures as a hobby. :-) -viral > On Jul 22, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Viral Shah <vi...@fourthlion.in> wrote: > > I am hoping we can have beta support from the 0.5 release onwards for > sequential julia. We were able to do this work due to some

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

I was able to sucessfully package julia. Files are here. You have to also download the libtatlas.so and put it on your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0rXlkvSbIfhR1RsbUV2VkpFMFk=sharing -viral > On Jul 22, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org&

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

rs. Then I switch to make -j 1 but > takes time to finish. I hope it will compile in both power7 and power8. > > I'll wait and try to check if I can fix some obvious errors. Otherwise, I'll > ask the tarball so that I can check the difference from what I have specially > which objects

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

ion. Since I have no git > access on this machine, I used make -C deps getall to pull the deps before > copying the source files to Power8. It may be possible the deps were not > properly resolved? > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote: >

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

run: > > <http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf> > > <http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/> > > <http://www.perl.org/> > > make[2]: *** [julia/deps/srccache/patchelf-0.9/Makefile.in] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [build/patchelf-0.9/src/p

[julia-users] Re: JuliaCon schedule announced

Both these tutorials are up now. The others seem are there. -viral On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 1:00:17 AM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote: > > I don't see the tutorial that David Sanders gave, or the one that I gave. > Might be others missing too?

Re: [julia-users] Re: JuliaCon schedule announced

I doubt we are going to be able to do much at this point. Andreas and I are checking with the video person, but not looking promising on this front. -viral On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 1:39:40 AM UTC-4, Christian Peel wrote: > > I saw quite a few videos with the same problem. > > On Mon, Jul

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

|\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | Commit 80fcb57 (0 days old master) > |__/ | ppc64le-redhat-linux > > Thanks for going through this with me. Hopefully it will be easier for the > next person. > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 10:27:27 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: > &

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

Julia now builds on master. No longer need to disable threading. Make.user for me is now: override USE_SYSTEM_BLAS = 1 override LIBBLAS = -L/usr/lib64/atlas -lsatlas override LIBBLASNAME = libsatlas override USE_BLAS64 = 0 -viral > On Jul 19, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Viral Shah

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

] Error 1 > make: *** [julia-deps] Error 2 > > Do I need to add something to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the makefile or bash > environment? > > On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 3:59:55 PM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: > There is some old ATLAS stuff in there to build atlas that hasn’t bee

Re: [julia-users] IBM Power port

> > > > On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 2:07:38 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: > The current master now seems to be in good shape for Power, for those > interested in trying it out. OpenBLAS is still working out a few bugs, but in > the meanwhile, I was able to successfully link agai

[julia-users] Re: julia on power8

I posted my success on power8 here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/power$20ibm/julia-users/xB0k7XMBNqM/u3eor0IiAwAJ Since then, there are a couple of compiler issues that came in that need work on power. We are going to make sure that 0.5 builds on power, since the port

[julia-users] Re: JuliaCon schedule announced

All the JuliaCon videos are up now. Please share this link far and wide. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP8iPy9hna6SQPwZUDtAM59-wPzCPyD_S -viral On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 5:34:18 PM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: > > The JuliaCon talks and workshop schedule has now been announced. &g

Re: [julia-users] JuliaCon schedule announced

s talk > > On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 1:58:48 PM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> They will keep trickling in. We will announce widely when everything is >> up. >> >> -viral >> >> >> > On 03-Jul-2016, at 9:25 AM, dnm <rtem...@gmail.com&

[julia-users] IBM Power port

The current master now seems to be in good shape for Power, for those interested in trying it out. OpenBLAS is still working out a few bugs, but in the meanwhile, I was able to successfully link against Atlas using the following Make.user: override USE_SYSTEM_BLAS = 1 override LIBBLAS =

Re: [julia-users] JuliaCon schedule announced

rote: > A link: https://www.youtube.com/user/JuliaLanguage/videos > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote: > They have already started appearing. Hopefully by next week they will all be > up and we will announce then. > > -viral > > On

Re: [julia-users] Re: JuliaCon schedule announced

2016 at 11:13:25 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> Live streaming was too expensive and we did not do it this year, but we >> certainly want to next year. >> >> -viral >> On Jun 22, 2016 10:33 AM, "Gabriel Gellner" <gabriel...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [julia-users] JuliaCon schedule announced

t; On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 11:13:25 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: > Live streaming was too expensive and we did not do it this year, but we > certainly want to next year. > > -viral > > On Jun 22, 2016 10:33 AM, "Gabriel Gellner" <gabriel...@gmail.com> wro

Re: [julia-users] Re: JuliaCon schedule announced

ess if that would help at all. Super stoked to see so many of > these sweet talks! > > On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 6:49:43 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> Yes they will be and hopefully much sooner than last year. >> >> -viral >> On Jun 22, 2016 7:31 AM,

Re: [julia-users] Re: JuliaCon schedule announced

9, 2016 at 11:34:18 PM UTC+2, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> The JuliaCon talks and workshop schedule has now been announced. >> >> http://juliacon.org/schedule.html >> >> Please buy your tickets if you have been procrastinating. We have seen >> tickets going

Re: [julia-users] JuliaCon schedule announced

Absolutely -viral > On 20-Jun-2016, at 3:28 PM, Evan Fields wrote: > > Can non-registered local Julia fans show up for the hackathon?

[julia-users] Re: [ANN]: ScikitLearn.jl 0.1.0 released, now with Julia ecosystem support

I've been following the progress and this is really beginning to look pretty awesome! -viral On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 7:29:39 AM UTC-4, Cedric St-Jean wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce the first major relase of ScikitLearn.jl > ! It now works with

[julia-users] Re: testing positive definiteness via Cholesky?

isposdef() or catch the exception from cholfact. -viral On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 10:16:29 PM UTC-4, vava...@uwaterloo.ca wrote: > > In Matlab to check if a symmetric sparse matrix is positive definite, I > can say [R,p]=chol(A) and then if p>0 etc. Is this functionality available > in

[julia-users] JuliaCon schedule announced

The JuliaCon talks and workshop schedule has now been announced. http://juliacon.org/schedule.html Please buy your tickets if you have been procrastinating. We have seen tickets going much faster this year, and waiting until the day before is unlikely to work this year. Please also spread the

Re: [julia-users] Julia text editor on iPad?

Perhaps we need to update to a newer version of Jupyter for the arrow keys? On the reliability front, Sheehan can you tell us what kind of instabilities are you facing? We are quite keen to make this reliable, and generally there are thousands of sessions every week. The sessions are

Re: [julia-users] Re: Grant funding and Julia Computing?

+1 to what Steve says. We do a bunch of stuff with grants at Julia Computing, which fund new capabilities, or building domain specific packages. If you look at our blog posts, you can see the kind of work funded through such grants. In the simplest case, it will greatly help both parties, if

[julia-users] JuliaCon sponsorships

Hello, JuliaCon sponsorship details are now in place at http://juliacon.org. Platinum tier is $15,000 and gets you 3 free tickets and a 15 min speaking slot. Gold tier is $5,000 and gets you 2 free tickets and a 10 min speaking slot. Silver tier is $2,000 and gets you 1 free ticket and a 5 min

Re: [julia-users] Julia on Android (and/or the web) - a scientific calculator on steroids.. good for tablets

ve apps like termux provides. The thing is I've recently started to a new > job so it may not be straight away. > > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 8:32:02 AM UTC+2, Viral Shah wrote: > How about making this a GSOC project? Could you perhaps submit a PR to the > GSOC project page on jul

Re: [julia-users] What to read to understand finishing v0.5?

gging/compiling > infrastructure. The main work is not in Gallium.jl iself, but in the lower > layers. > > On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 10:45:15 AM UTC+1, DNF wrote: > On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 7:00:46 AM UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote: > This is about the right time to sta

Re: [julia-users] Re: What to read to understand finishing v0.5?

This is about the right time to start the triage for the various 0.5 issues. With all the amazing compiler improvements, LLVM upgrade, Cxx readiness, thread-safety (will probably remain disabled for 0.5 potentially unless it receives significant testing) and a number of other cool things, I

Re: [julia-users] ANN: A potential new Discourse-based Julia forum

-forward new posts from google to discourse? What > about an automated warning to direct users to the new site? > > +1 for moving > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org> wrote: > Yes, I think we should give this a shot. > > O

Re: [julia-users] ANN: A potential new Discourse-based Julia forum

Yeah, we should qualify. The next step would be to have a someone (Jonathan Malmud?) come up with a migrating plan, and we should also formally appoint a group of list admins to carry out the day to day activities, enforce community standards, etc. -viral > On 09-Mar-2016, at 4:31 PM,

Re: [julia-users] Julia on Android (and/or the web) - a scientific calculator on steroids.. good for tablets

How about making this a GSOC project? Could you perhaps submit a PR to the GSOC project page on julialang.org with these ideas, since you seem to have made the most amount of progress here? -viral > On 09-Mar-2016, at 11:47 AM, Lutfullah Tomak wrote: > > I think the

[julia-users] Re: Julia on Android (and/or the web) - a scientific calculator on steroids.. good for tablets

I took a hard look at porting Julia to Android with a friend's help who is a core Android developer at Google. The android toolchain was the most daunting part, and I got stuck at cross compilation of julia dependencies. I personally would love to help get julia on android, as I have heard many

Re: [julia-users] overhead of accessing rows vs columns in SparseMatrixCSC format

, Viral Shah wrote: > > Nobody is working on it at the moment, that I know of. We almost had a > working version then, but it was deemed too complex to include in Base at > that time. > > -viral > > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 6:28:26 AM UTC+5:30, Anonymous wrote: >>

Re: [julia-users] overhead of accessing rows vs columns in SparseMatrixCSC format

Nobody is working on it at the moment, that I know of. We almost had a working version then, but it was deemed too complex to include in Base at that time. -viral On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 6:28:26 AM UTC+5:30, Anonymous wrote: > > Thank you for the response, I read the 2015 discussion on

[julia-users] Re: QuantLib in Julia: JQuantLib (very very alpha stage at this point!)

You've already got a nice body of code there! -viral On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:02:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christopher Alexander wrote: > > Hello all, I'd like to point people in the direction of a package I've > been working on: JQuantLib, to get some feedback. Basically, I am trying > to

[julia-users] Collecting user codes for indexing benchmarks

Hello all, I am collecting as many user codes as I can lay my hands on for the Indexing benchmarks. Primarily the goal is to evaluate array views and performance / correctness impacts. If this effort is successful, it will also create a body of user codes that we can use for longer term

[julia-users] Re: julia on ARM for a drone

Making sure I understand correctly, were you using the distribution on julialang.org/downloads? If you had to do a few things to get it to work, can you file issues? I personally would love to see more such applications and that was the motivation to have an ARM port in the first place.

[julia-users] Eclipse plugin for Julia

We've put together an Eclipse plugin for Julia and open sourced it. This includes some early work, and the plans are to take it to the next level with participation from everyone. Blog post: http://juliacomputing.com/blog/2016/02/06/Eclipse-JuliaDT.html Repository:

Re: [julia-users] a good IDE for Julia ? (Julia Studio does not work with Julia v 0.3.0)

We are also quite close to having new complete bundles like Juno + LT. Would be great for Mike to chime in here. -viral > On 26-Jan-2016, at 8:18 PM, Andre P. wrote: > > Just wanted to add that I use Atom+Julia client both on Windows and Mac. The > firewall issue with

Re: [julia-users] randperm run time is slow

Unfortunately, this makes the implementation GPL. If you can describe the algorithm in an issue on github, someone can do a cleanroom implementation. -viral On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 3:17:19 PM UTC+5:30, Dan wrote: > > Another way to go about it, is to look at R's implementation of a

[julia-users] Re: Optimizing Function Injection in Julia

Only the first post is moderated, to prevent spammers from getting through. -viral On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 7:32:50 AM UTC+5:30, Bryan Rivera wrote: > > Guys, it's killing me having to wait hours until my posts are approved. > > (Ability to edit would be nice as well.. Although it looks

Re: [julia-users] randperm run time is slow

Generating one by one or together is a small part of the execution time: julia> @time rand(3*10^8); 1.281946 seconds (10 allocations: 2.235 GB, 0.23% gc time) julia> r(n) = for i=1:n; rand(); end; julia> @time r(3*10^8) 0.632389 seconds (6 allocations: 192 bytes) The one by one is perhaps

Re: [julia-users] randperm run time is slow

If you see the code as @timholy suggested, you will see the knuth shuffle implementation. Let's capture this as a Julia performance issue on github, if we can't figure out an easy way to speed this up right away. -viral On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 9:47:21 AM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote

[julia-users] Re: Euler Maruyama for neural networks, slower than python

The matrix-vector multiply in there will lose the benefit of BLAS in devectorization. This is one area where we ought to be better, since this code is best not devectorized (from a user's perspective). On my mac, python is .27 seconds and julia 0.4 is .47 seconds. Python is perhaps not using a

[julia-users] Re: ARM binaries for julia 0.4

: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8359 -viral On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 12:54:16 AM UTC+5:30, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Viral - > > What Linux distribution, GCC version, etc was used to build these? > > -Tony > > > On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 5:50:05

Re: [julia-users] Intel Xeon Phi support?

Phi is very unlikely, as there is no official LLVM support. Keno performed some heroics, but not having real LLVM support was a major showstopper. Julia is expected to work on KNL though, whenever it comes out. -viral On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 9:22:39 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Rackauckas wrote:

[julia-users] Re: Running julia script on the web

Please see the Mux.jl, JuliaWebAPI.jl, or Escher.jl packages. Did you also see JuliaWebStack? Did you do some search and digging and not find what you were looking for? -viral On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 12:02:29 AM UTC+5:30, parth patel wrote: > > I am a new user to Julia. I was wondering

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

ginal Message- > > From: julia-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:julia- > > us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Viral Shah > > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:00 PM > > To: julia-users@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant. > >

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

gt; wrote: > > 1. Congratulations! > 2. Having a good Eclipse plugin for Julia is the dream for many potential > users, just like me. Looking forward to hear some good news on that ! > > On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 11:12:16 PM UTC-8, Viral Shah wrote: > > Inde

Re: [julia-users] Does any one have Raspberry Pi 2 Julia binaries?

Yes, I did this on ubuntu 14.04. I guess we really need buildbots and all the other infrastructure on arm. -viral > On 30-Dec-2015, at 1:15 PM, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Viral, these are built from Ubuntu 14.04, right? I found with the previous > binaries it was sometines

Re: [julia-users] Does any one have Raspberry Pi 2 Julia binaries?

Perhaps I should just build for 0.4.2 and upload as an alpha release to our downloads page? -viral On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 4:16:45 AM UTC+5:30, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > Le dimanche 27 décembre 2015 à 11:47 -0800, Ismael Venegas Castelló a > écrit : > > has anyone successfully

Re: [julia-users] Does any one have Raspberry Pi 2 Julia binaries?

; Data Analyst > Cel. 044 55 6434 0229 > ivene...@richit.com.mx > Cerro San Francisco 357, C.P. 04200 > Campestre Churubusco, Coyoacán > Ciudad de México > > > Tel. 6718 1818 > richit.com.mx > > 2015-12-29 10:50 GMT-06:00 Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org>

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

fer. > > A bonus would be filling out gadfly towards Ggplot and ggvis capability. > > > > On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 11:50:42 AM UTC-5, Viral Shah wrote: > What would be helpful is to know what kind of decisions you are thinking of > and what are the factors.

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

ledge, Right now SAS and STATA are the only packages that offer general modeling with on disk data sets, but the sort of capability I outlined would seem to be in excess of what they offer. >>> >>> A bonus would be filling out gadfly towards Ggplot and ggvis capability. >>

[julia-users] Re: Do I need to pay for Juliabox?

At the moment, we don't have a way to pay for parallel computing. If there were sufficient interest, we would love to build it. Also, there is the longer term issue of funding JuliaBox, which currently runs on sponsorship. We suspect we will need a new sponsor in ~4 months, or the whole of

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

ot; <lampk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to bug you, but can we expect something this or next week? Would > be helpful in knowing until when to push some stuff off. > > On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 6:20:45 PM UTC-5, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> >> The JuliaStats team

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

Viral, > > Any update on this (stats + df) by chance or idea when we can get one? Even a > roadmap or some sort of vision or other details would help with decision > making regarding infrastructure. > > Thanks! > > On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 3:00:50 AM UTC-5,

[julia-users] Re: ANN: DSGE.jl

This is really fantastic! Also great to see more economics codebases being open sourced, and some high quality libraries. Hoping such tools becomes a standard tool at central banks worldwide, and more code is open sourced! -viral On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 7:35:57 PM UTC+5:30, Spencer

Re: [julia-users] ANN: DSGE.jl

DSGE is a very common name in economics, but Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models don’t mean much elsewhere. I would love to see some of those components underneath such as the Kalman filter come from other packages eventually. -viral > On 04-Dec-2015, at 7:47 AM, Tony Kelman

Re: [julia-users] Creating a stable version of Julia + Packages for a semester long course?

Various classes are using JuliaBox now. There are occasional hiccups, but they are much fewer nowadays. If you do use JuliaBox, we'll be happy to support in any way we can. Also, the JuliaBox local install is a good way forward if it is not a large class. It will work on one big shared memory

[julia-users] Re: Creating a stable version of Julia + Packages for a semester long course?

While not directly relevant right away, one idea that we have mulled over is the possibility of people having their own METADATA snapshots or even completely private METADATAs. This is just a thought, and there may be better ways to do this. We have this same problem maintaining JuliaBox. 0.3

Re: [julia-users] Julia 0.3 download link?

On Saturday, November 14, 2015 at 8:30:32 PM UTC+5:30, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 3:50:09 PM UTC-5, Milan Bouchet-Valat > wrote: >> >> Le vendredi 13 novembre 2015 à 12:40 -0800, David Anthoff a écrit : >> > There is a link to “old releases” on the download

Re: [julia-users] JuliaML

Sent you the invite to JuliaML. Would be nice to start populating it with existing packages by moving them. -viral On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 5:00:34 AM UTC+5:30, Kenta Sato wrote: > > JuliaML! sounds cool! > I can offer the JuliaML organization my random forest package ( >

Re: [julia-users] Re: The growth of Julia userbase

Attching the github traffic data. Doesn't have history though, but the numbers were bigger than what I expected when I first saw this. Some other interesting numbers: 1. ~10,000 pageviews on the website daily 2. 1.7M "users" and 8.6M pageviews over the lifetime of julialang.org - as per

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

We are glad that the Moore Foundation, especially Chris Mentzel, has supported Julia in a number of ways. -viral On 11 Nov 2015 3:04 p.m., "Kristoffer Carlsson" wrote: > Wow, awesome! Well deserved!

[julia-users] Re: Google releases TensorFlow as open source

I think TensorFlow.jl is a great idea. Also their distributed computation framework is also the kind that we want to have in Julia. I have created JuliaML. Send me email if you want to be part of it, and I will make you an owner. Perhaps we can even move some of the JuliaStats ML projects to

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

-Original Message- >> From: julia-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:julia- >> us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Viral Shah >> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 12:01 AM >> To: julia-users <julia-users@googlegroups.com> >> Subject: [julia-users] Moore found

Re: [julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

ave ideas, plans what such an IDE could > look like? And/or a word about technology? > > > On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 09:00:50 UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote: > Yes, we are really excited. This grant is to focus on core Julia compiler > infrastructure and key math

[julia-users] Moore foundation grant.

Yes, we are really excited. This grant is to focus on core Julia compiler infrastructure and key math libraries. Much of the libraries focus will be on statistical Computing. -viral

[julia-users] Re: [ANN] Word2Vec.jl, a Julia interface to word2vec

Are either of these parallel? Any plans to parallelize? -viral On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 6:21:52 PM UTC+5:30, Sergey Bartunov wrote: > > There is also our package for an extension of word2vec - > https://github.com/sbos/AdaGram.jl which has almost the same speed and > functionality as

Re: [julia-news] Re: [julia-users] ANN: Julia v0.4.0 released!

And true to our word, the release is during JuliaCon - just a different one. :-) -viral On 9 Oct 2015 4:57 pm, "Stefan Karpinski" wrote: > Hurrah! What a long, strange trip it's been. This is a great release. > Thanks to everyone who made it happen. > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015

Re: [julia-users] Why is juliabox.org offline?

AWS seems to have resolved its issue and the site is accessible again. -viral On Thursday, September 24, 2015 at 4:17:09 AM UTC+5:30, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/julia-box/_CVqq9yX8BI > > If you're a regular user, you may want to join the mailing list. >

  1   2   3   4   5   >