Nobody is working on it at the moment, that I know of. We almost had a working version then, but it was deemed too complex to include in Base at that time.
-viral On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 6:28:26 AM UTC+5:30, Anonymous wrote: > > Thank you for the response, I read the 2015 discussion on here about CSR > sparse matrices, do you happen to know the implementation status on when > this will be included? > > On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 4:59:40 PM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote: >> >> Likely yes to both. Best to just test yourself, of course. >> >> I'm sure you know this, but you'll want to access them through the return >> values of findnz or equivalent, not using S[i,j]. >> >> --Tim >> >> On Monday, March 07, 2016 10:50:58 AM Anonymous wrote: >> > So I have a sparse matrix which doesn't get modified by for which I >> would >> > like to access by rows, is there significantly more overhead in >> accessing >> > rows vs columns? If so, would it be more efficient to instead access >> the >> > columns of its transpose? >> >>
