Ah, that was obvious. Example of why late night coding isn't very
productive :) Thanks!
On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 2:15:02 AM UTC+3, Yichao Yu wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Andrei Zh > wrote:
> > I didn't know about such capability, thanks. But I still can't figure
> out
>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Andrei Zh wrote:
> I didn't know about such capability, thanks. But I still can't figure out
> how to call this constructor. E.g.:
>
> julia> Bar{Int}()
> ERROR: MethodError: `convert` has no method matching
> convert(::Type{Bar{Int64}})
> This may have arisen fr
I didn't know about such capability, thanks. But I still can't figure out
how to call this constructor. E.g.:
julia> Bar{Int}()
ERROR: MethodError: `convert` has no method matching convert(::Type{Bar{
Int64}})
This may have arisen from a call to the constructor Bar{Int64}(...),
since type con
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Andrei Zh wrote:
> Let's consider 2 types with inner constructors:
>
> type Foo
> x::Array{Int,1}
>
>
> Foo() = Foo(zeros(Int, 10))
> end
>
> type Bar{T}
> x::Array{T,1}
>
>
> Bar() = Bar(zeros(T, 10))
> end
>
> The only difference between them is t
Let's consider 2 types with inner constructors:
type Foo
x::Array{Int,1}
Foo() = Foo(zeros(Int, 10))
end
type Bar{T}
x::Array{T,1}
Bar() = Bar(zeros(T, 10))
end
The only difference between them is that `Bar` has type parameter while
`Foo` doesn't. I'd expect their inner con
