I completely agree with you and would love to see julia drop singleton
dimensions indexed with scalar. There is an issue on this with lots of
discussion, which was left at the point of waiting til someone implements
some code to give it a try (see
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/5949).
An issue I noticed with Dataframes recently is that head(df) and tail(df)
both list the show(df) summary (like those above) instead of listing the
top and bottom of the dataframe. I just started using dataframes so I have
no idea what they did in the past but it seems they should list the df and
I often find myself wishing for a pager in the repl when outputing large
amount of output. I see that there is a Base.less but it is only used on
files and not for outputting other stuff in the repl. In fact, it would be
great to have support for less, head, and tail like functionality for
looking
OK done. See https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6921
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Kevin Squire kevin.squ...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree that that would be nice. Would you be willing to open up an issue
for this?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt
of a DataFrame. So you're seeing the usual show method's output, which can
be overriden by explicitly requesting that you see the whole DataFrame. See
https://github.com/JuliaStats/DataFrames.jl/blob/master/spec/show.md
-- John
On May 22, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com wrote
But julia often does show large screen dumps. Try:
julia h={1=1}; for i=2:10 h[i]=i end; h
:-)
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Mauro mauro...@runbox.com wrote:
Octave has an automatic pager, which I don't like, but which I like
better than matlab's endless screen dumps. I think the
, at 12:01 PM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com wrote:
But julia often does show large screen dumps. Try:
julia h={1=1}; for i=2:10 h[i]=i end; h
:-)
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Mauro mauro...@runbox.com wrote:
Octave has an automatic pager, which I don't like, but which I
) or there is more data (!eof)
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having an issue detecting if STDOUT is empty after I redirect it.
I'm using an external C program may or may not write to STDOUT. Thus, I
need to know if there is anything there before I
or readbytes
The number of bytes that can be read without a syscall (nb_available) is
not a good test of how much can be gotten from a syscall. However, after
eof returns true, then nb_available is the upper bound on the data that can
be read.
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt
, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jameson Nash vtjn...@gmail.com wrote:
You shouldnt need to explicitly call eof or close
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. I've got something that works, but it seems necessary to add a dummy
write and then strip it out at the end
What about naming it the Data{T} type instead of Option{T} (or
Optional{T}). Seems to fit in the DataArray{T} theme better and gives me a
better idea what it is from the name (at least once one knows about
DataArrays).
Bob
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:56 AM, John Myles White
Yes, that command rand(3*ones(Int,12)...) throws julia into an infinite
loop. No good. And very strange.
Bob
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Jason ja...@jasonknight.us wrote:
Is that from a different version of Julia?
*julia **rand(3*ones(12)...)*
*ERROR: `rand` has no method matching
I think using curly braces to denote indexing with dropped singleton
dimensions would be nice:
eg
a[1,:,:] works as now, returns an Array with 3 dimensions
a{1,:,:} returns an Array with 2 dimensions
I realize this has syntax conflicts at this point but it seems it could be
made to work.
Bob
. Unfortunately, there are not very many ASCII
paired brackets.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think using curly braces to denote indexing with dropped singleton
dimensions would be nice:
eg
a[1,:,:] works as now, returns an Array with 3
include is just about splitting a single file into multiple pieces
Ok. But then why does include work at the REPL prompt? What is the
difference between include and reload? I really think there are too many
ways to do the same thing.
Bob
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Stefan Karpinski
loaded before. Typically used when
interactively developing libraries.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK. But then what is the difference between include and reload?
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Stefan Karpinski ste...@karpinski.org
wrote
OK. But then what is the difference between include and reload?
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Stefan Karpinski ste...@karpinski.org
wrote:
Why wouldn't it work in the REPL? It means paste the contents of this
file here.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com
But Michael Hatherly's showed code above that uses a generated function to
solve this. It seems to work pretty well in the short while I tried it in
the REPL. Granted I didn't time it or do anything complicated. It works on
Stefan's example above with no problem. The only difference is that one
I have written a (pretty) complete wrapper for IDL (years ago actually),
but have not uploaded to github. I'll try to do that this weekend (and put
an update here). I wrote it for my own use and have been waiting for Julia
to mature to promote it to the IDL community. I originally wrote it for
I use a simple function for this:
function newdim(A::AbstractArray, d::Integer)
@assert 0 < d <= ndims(A)+1
dim = size(A)
reshape(A, dim[1:d-1]..., 1, dim[d:end]...)
end
But having syntax for a newaxis would be great. See also:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/5405
ry
> much like to use it.
>
> -Luke
>
> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-7, Bob Nnamtrop wrote:
>>
>> I have written a (pretty) complete wrapper for IDL (years ago actually),
>> but have not uploaded to github. I'll try to do that this weekend (and put
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
