Re: [julia-users] How to determine which functions to overload, or, who is at the bottom of the function chain?

This was a very helpful answer. Thank you very much for responding. Cheers, Colin On 16 October 2016 at 20:23, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le samedi 15 octobre 2016 à 20:36 -0700, colintbow...@gmail.com a > écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > Twice now I've thought I had

Re: [julia-users] Re: How to build a range of -Inf to Inf

This is interesting thanks. I didn't realise you could re-assign j inside the index like that. A very neat notational trick. But I agree that looking forward the filter! option is probably best. I'll adjust my code accordingly, many thanks. As an aside, every time I post code to this list I get

Re: [julia-users] Re: How to build a range of -Inf to Inf

Yep. Agreed. Totally redundant :-) Cheers, Colin On 4 June 2016 at 05:11, DNF wrote: > Your in-method is a bit odd: > > Base.in{T}(x::T, r::BasicInterval{T}) = (r.start <= x <= r.stop) ? true : > false > > Why don't you just write > > Base.in{T}(x::T, r::BasicInterval{T}) =

Re: [julia-users] Re: Deprecation warnings using julia on Atom

Hi Jeremy, This sounded promising, as at some point I did have IPython installed so I could use Jacob Quinn's Sublime-IJulia package. It is possible that something was left behind. However, unfortunately I haven't been able to find anything that looks suspicious (I'm on Ubuntu 14.04). For those

Re: [julia-users] Deprecation warnings using julia on Atom

I've not heard of lightbox. Do you mean LightTable? I used to use LightTable with Mike Innes Juno package, but made the switch to Atom because my understanding is that from v0.4 onwards, Mike will be concentrating his efforts there. To be honest, I'm really happy with Atom and the Julia packages.

Re: [julia-users] Converting a string to a custom type results in a function that is not type stable

If you're interested, the source is here: https://github.com/colintbowers/DependentBootstrap.jl I haven't tried to make it into a registered package yet as I'm still tinkering with it a fair bit. But I think I'm nearly there. It is fairly comprehensive for univariate bootstrapping, ie lots of

Re: [julia-users] Converting a string to a custom type results in a function that is not type stable

Thanks for responding. Yes, I think I will do it your way. I was initially hoping there would be a neat way to duplicate how R would do it, ie, with keyword arguments typically always strings or numbers since this is what many new users will be familiar with, but maybe in the end it would just be

Re: [julia-users] Re: When are function arguments going to be inlined?

end UF1 = CRRA(4,2,1) UF2 = LogUtility() @time test1(UF1) @time test2(UF2) elapsed time: 0.005229738 seconds (80 bytes allocated) elapsed time: 0.004894504 seconds (80 bytes allocated) On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 8:28:28 PM UTC-4, Colin Bowers wrote: Yes, that is pretty much how I

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computing problem in a loop

My apologies for not responding sooner. I have been clearing a stack of referee reports off my desk. No problems. It's end of semester here in Australia so I've been buried under piles of marking anyway :-) Thus, I would be very interested in learning more about your work in coding the MCS

Re: [julia-users] Re: When are function arguments going to be inlined?

Yes, that is pretty much how I would do it, although, as I said in my previous post, I would set `UtilityFunction` to an abstract type, and then define my actual utility function immutable, say `MyCustomUtilityFunc`, as a subtype of `UtilityFunction`. That way you can easily add different types of

Re: [julia-users] Re: Index into an array with an IntSet

Cool, works for me. Many thanks. On 16 June 2015 at 10:27, David Gold david.gol...@gmail.com wrote: `collect(myIntSet)` should also do it, I believe. On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 8:20:15 PM UTC-4, colint...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, I understand. Thanks for responding and pointing me to the