Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Hello Bill, Sorry to grap out that thread again. I just did that Pkg.update thingy again, mainly git stash - git stash apply...In the end after I git stash apply it tells me On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add ..." to

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Ok, but why do I need to do that??? I mean other packages also dont need git to put the changes to the side temporarily in order to be able to update itsself?! So what is the specific issue here?

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Diger@Diger-PC MINGW64 /d/julia/v0.5/nemo (master) $ git config --global user.name "Diger" Diger@Diger-PC MINGW64 /d/julia/v0.5/nemo (master) $ git stash *** Please tell me who you are. Run git config --global user.email "y...@example.com" git config --global user.name "Your Name" to set

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Diger@Diger-PC MINGW64 /d/julia/v0.5/nemo (master) $ git status On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed) (use "git checkout -- ..." to discard changes in working directory)

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Diger@Diger-PC /cygdrive/d/julia/v0.5/nemo $ git status On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed) (use "git checkout -- ..." to discard changes in working directory) modified:

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2016 14:27:26 UTC+1 schrieb Bill Hart: > > It's probably due to the fact that you've made some changes in the git > repository. You can do git stash to temporarily store the changes you made, > then do Pkg.update() and then if you still need the changes, do git stash >

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Freitag, 28. Oktober 2016 13:31:13 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Hart: > > We'll consider changing it. It's mainly supposed to be for us developers > so we can build the binaries, but if people want to actually use it, I > guess we should maintain it a bit more carefully. > > Bill. > BTW, when trying

[julia-users] 3D plot (Plots)

is it possible to somehow 3d plot the following input? x=array of length n y=array of length m z=array of size mxn like it can be done in matlab?

Re: [julia-users] anonymous function

I didnt see it

Re: [julia-users] anonymous function

sry u must have written when I was writing...

Re: [julia-users] anonymous function

ok: f(x)=x^2 is not an anonymous function however f=x->x^2 is an anonymous function unfortunately my function is not just one line so I cant use f=x->x^2 and I have to use something like function f(x) end this however is not anonymous... Is there something like that with function ... end

[julia-users] anonymous function

So an anonymous function I can write like this f=x->x^2 is it also possible to make an anonymous function out of this: function f(x) x^2 end

Re: [julia-users] Re: MersenneTwister, srand

Sorry but that doesn't answer my question. That's where I have the calling from but it does not explain the output and what it means...

[julia-users] Re: MersenneTwister, srand

With number in my head I meant, that I expected to see random number arrays of size 624 since as far as I know they are created simultaneously,right?

[julia-users] MersenneTwister, srand

So what is the difference between srand and merseentwister? when I do: r=srand(0) I get the same as r=MersenneTwister(0) and also how do I get my random numbers what do the different fields mean? e.g. julia> r.(1) 1-element Array{UInt32,1}: 0x julia> r.(2)

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

> > Yes but when I do not manually change i686 and ABI=32 to the x64 it is > running the 32bit version, right? > You mean windows 64 can still cope with 32bit stuff? > I mean changing in the windows_build.txt By Pkg.build("Nemo") I do not run any executable, right?

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

> > Both should work. If you use a 64 bit Julia executable it sould build the > 64 bit version. Otherwise it should build the 32 bit version. > > Bill. > Yes but when I do not manually change i686 and ABI=32 to the x64 it is running the 32bit version, right? You mean windows 64 can still

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 23:00:48 UTC+2 schrieb Tommy Hofmann: > > There is a reason I asked to check for two libflint files three days ago. > I saw this error with the missing libflint-13.dll before. The ln command > can and will fail silently for various reasons. Maybe just to

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 22:27:52 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Hart: > > Yes, we'll eventually get rid of the warnings. Technically we only fully > support Julia-0.4 at the moment. However, Nemo is known to work with > Julia-0.5 with some warnings. > > Thanks for persisting with it. I'm glad it

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 21:25:54 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey Sarnoff: > > You are home free! Try arbfield(1) twice .. > Yes I know the warning is gone I'm just wondering why it always shows up the first time... home free? in terms of homedir() or what you mean?

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 20:24:19 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Hart: > > It could well be libflint-13.dll is the problem. It's just a copy of the > other flint dll, so you can make that any way you like. Just copy the file > and rename the copy. > > As for the dll DependencyWalker claims is

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 19:33:22 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey Sarnoff: > > libflint-13.dll appears to be a copy of libflint.dll with a different name > and you can try copying libflint.dll to libflint-13.dll > The .git\ is not there because you have not tried to add then build Nemo > with git

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

@Bill: it's telling me for example EXT-MS-WIN-KERNEL32-QUIRKS-L1-1-1.DLL error opening file. file not found thats not what u mean, or? Thats in the middle tab... Additionally it says quite generally: Error: At least one required implicit or forwarded dependency was not found.

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

ober 2016 at 02:04, Bill Hart <goodwi...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> The only thing I can think of to suggest is try it again from scratch in >>> Julia-0.4 so we can rule out the dlls being corrupted on our website >>> somehow. >>> >>> I can't think what else could be wrong, unless something else changed in >>> Julia itself on Windows, between versions 0.4 and 0.5. >>> >>> Jeffrey, are you using 64 bit Windows with Julia 0.5? >>> >>> Bill. >>> >>> On 26 October 2016 at 23:02, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> It's weird coz in julia 0.4.x it was running without any problems... >>>> >>> >>> >>

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

It's weird coz in julia 0.4.x it was running without any problems...

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

I'm running Windows 10 Home 64-Bit Version and have the newest Julia version i.e. v0.5.0

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

So, first of all it is (unfortunately) still not working... What I did so far is this: I removed my old GIT and installed the new one I then removed Nemo within Julia and subsequently manually removed every nemo stuff I could find in folder v0.5 I then started Julia (@Bill: This time I'm running

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

w git -- etc. > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:17 PM, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2016 20:51:48 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Hart: >>> >>> I mean as an environment variable, specifically PATH. Alternativel

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

> > > > Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2016 21:40:22 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey Sarnoff: >> >> you commented out too much -- try the other way >> uncomment the Nemo build file and remove the old git-bash and install the >> new git -- etc. >> > actually I'm doing that already atm..

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2016 20:51:48 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Hart: > > I mean as an environment variable, specifically PATH. Alternatively you > can just remove the lines from Nemo/deps/build.jl that run git. The source > code is not needed on Windows. We only download it for you to keep in the

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

I do have Gitbash installed for some reason, but I never used it and it's in c:\programs Sorry for that stupid question but u mean put the folder with git-cmd.exe or git-bash.exe as an environment variable

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2016 09:23:36 UTC+2 schrieb Bill Hart: > > This is probably because Git is not in your path. We still haven't > switched to libgit, which means the build script for Nemo still relies on > Git being available on your machine. > > Bill. > Git in the path means Git in

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

> > > On 26 October 2016 at 01:43, Jeffrey Sarnoff > wrote: > >> send me all the messages output, please >> > that were all the messages...

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

terminal) > and do >Pkg.build("Nemo") again? > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:37 PM, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com > > wrote: > >> Sry but I followed precisely ur steps i.e.: >> I installed a completely new version in D:\Julia\Julia-0.5.0 and added an >>

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Sry but I followed precisely ur steps i.e.: I installed a completely new version in D:\Julia\Julia-0.5.0 and added an environment variable JULIA_PKGDIR within D:\Julia because I didn't like the default one. I then initialized by Pkg.init() I ran Pkg.update() (prob not needed here coz its new) I

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Maybe to point out: the installation in the part where I tried to do it directly via the repl command window was in a completely new .julia path (to try it fresh from the beginning) with no influence of already existing stuff...

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Sorry again. But it is 64bit windows version just started in cygwin. I didn't think it makes any difference though However the behaviour seems different: When I start the Julia Repl command window directly I dont even get that far that Nemo is eventually installed: Following the steps

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Hey, Thx for ur reply. I tried both deleting all the files and run Pkg.build again... It however did not work as are all the files present too :-( Julia in cygwin is correct...

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

or does it try to download the source here upon Pkg.build("Nemo") ?

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Well so far nothing has changed ;) So: while loading C:\cygwin64\home\Diger\.julia\v0.5\Nemo\deps\build.jl, in expression starting on line 1 % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Maybe I should have pointed out that I'm on windows...

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

What do u mean that explains why it doesn't go any further? Is Nemo not finished yet for Windows?

Re: [julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

> > No it does not go on...When I manually start Pkg.build("Nemo") in the same > session I get: > julia> Pkg.build("Nemo") INFO: Building Nemo WARNING: `@windows` is deprecated, use `@static is_windows()` instead in depwarn(::String, ::Symbol) at .\deprecated.jl:64 in @windows(::Any, ::Any) at

[julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

It does not work either. When I run Pkg.build("Nemo") it starts julia> Pkg.build("Nemo") INFO: Building Nemo WARNING: `@windows` is deprecated, use `@static is_windows()` instead in depwarn(::String, ::Symbol) at .\deprecated.jl:64 in @windows(::Any, ::Any) at .\deprecated.jl:472 in

[julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

Hey, Sorry but I also get this error when I write r=AcbField(64) r(1,1) Likewise r=ArbField(64) r(1) gives me the same error...

[julia-users] Re: quadgk with 2 arguments

do u have an example for how to use a contour? quadgk(cis,0,1+1*im) probably integrates over the straight line so how can I integrate over the line gamma(t)=t+im*t^2

[julia-users] Re: Nemo AcbField error

push...

[julia-users] Re: Root finding package

well this is only for polynomials, right?

[julia-users] Re: quadgk with 2 arguments

Btw: Can quadgk also be used for complex functions? (the integration is still over a real range)

[julia-users] Re: quadgk with 2 arguments

thx

[julia-users] quadgk with 2 arguments

having a function of the form f(s,t) defined is it possible to somehow tell quadgk to not evaluate until I supply a value for s while t should be the integration variable? e.g. sth like. The syntax I found so far excluded any arguments... g=s-> quadgk(f(s,*),0,1)

[julia-users] Root finding package

So I know there is Roots but is there also one for finding complex roots?

[julia-users] Nemo AcbField error

Maybe I'm doing sth wrong or sth has changed since 0.4 but I get an error using an AcbField r=AcbField(64) res=r(1) ERROR: LoadError: error compiling AcbField: error compiling Type: could not load library "libarb" ▒ in include_from_node1(::String) at .\loading.jl:488

[julia-users] Re: Warning since 0.5

> > The function object then points into > method tables. You can't assign the name "f" to a different function > object, just attach different methods to it. The troubles seem to arise > from cached references to > orphaned method table entries, which are not completely dissociated from >

[julia-users] Re: Warning since 0.5

> > No, it has a name "f". An anonymous function is an expression like "x -> > x^2" that creates a function object without binding it to a constant name. > Ok, but from my feeling also f=x->x^2 binds this function object to the name f since thats how it is called? Right?

[julia-users] Re: Warning since 0.5

is f(x)=x^2 not an anonymous function?!?!

[julia-users] Re: Warning since 0.5

Maybe one sidenote: So what is the difference between f(x)=x^2 and f=x->x^2 since the last one does not return that warning?

[julia-users] Re: Warning since 0.5

Thanks for ur example I'm not that familiar with it but what do u mean by "module files"? Do you have an example and why are they less dangerous?

[julia-users] Re: Warning since 0.5

Hey, Thx for ur answer. So The first time I call my program which includes a file with function definitions there is no problem. I do this because with 0.4 parallel loops didnt work with functions which are defined in the same file even though an @everywhere is prefixed. I still dont understand

[julia-users] Warning since 0.5

Something has changed since the code which ran with 0.4 does return a warning now: include("C:\\Users\\Diger\\Documents\\Julia\\Diffusion\\bessel0_expansion_nlsolve.jl") WARNING: Method definition WARNING: Method definition WARNING: Method definition WARNING: Method definition WARNING: Method

[julia-users] Re: @threads all vs. @parallel ???

loop which applied a function to each element >> in an array, and I conveniently didn't need to bother using SharedArrays as >> I would with @parallel. >> >> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 7:20:36 PM UTC-4, digxx wrote: >>> >>> Sorry if there is already s

[julia-users] @threads all vs. @parallel ???

a link with some info? Thanks digxx

Re: [julia-users] overwrite function value

Yes and that is how I am doing it now...Though from somewhere else I was used to do it (see above) the other way by overwriting it inside...

Re: [julia-users] Re: overwrite function value

Probably...I just need to get used to it.

[julia-users] Re: overwrite function value

> > So in short it is not possible to do it with a value but only with an > array? > function f!(x) x[1]=x[1]+1 end x=[1] f!(x) ... Is it possible to do it via pointer?

[julia-users] overwrite function value

so when I define function f!(x) x=x+1 end and then x=1 f!(x) I get 2 returned but I also want x to be replaced by the newly calculated value :/

[julia-users] Re: BigInt / BigFloat / Bitshift

What is the difference between >> and >>> ?

[julia-users] Re: BigInt / BigFloat / Bitshift

Sorry: for example (n/2)^10 is still legid up to the last digit (neglecting the fact that these would be zero in this case anyway) that was actually a question though I missed the question marks. about the bitshift I found it being 4<<2 for example but is there sth like that for any basis?

[julia-users] BigInt / BigFloat / Bitshift

As far as I understand Julia adjusts the bitsize of an integer when I use BigInt. For example n=big(10)^1 is as many bits as needed. Now 2*n is still an integer though dividing makes a bigfloat out of it. How big is the bigfloat? does it "resolve" up to the last integer? Does it increase

Re: [julia-users] @animate @gif using plots

Is it possible to position the legend manually in a plot(x,y,leg_pos=???)

Re: [julia-users] @animate @gif using plots

Sorry again, not quite the same error: He was using ffmpeg apparently. Though I got it working with convert now (after removing all the imagemagick packages from julia and with the manually installed stuff) what is remaining is the jumping legend also seen in the above uploaded gif.

Re: [julia-users] @animate @gif using plots

> > I just manually installed imagemagick and got the error: > > julia> gif(anim,"C:\\Users\\Diger\\Documents\\Julia\\Plotting\\anim2.gif",fps=15) Unzul▒ssiger Parameter - 7 WARNING: Tried to create gif using convert (ImageMagick), but got error: ErrorException("failed process: Process(`convert

Re: [julia-users] @animate @gif using plots

after adding ImageMagick? The errors are because it > can't find either ImageMagick or ffmpeg, one of which is required to make > gifs. > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hey I reinstalled Julia and am now wondering why th

[julia-users] @animate @gif using plots

Hey I reinstalled Julia and am now wondering why the animation part of plots doesnt work anymore. It did before... I presume I'm lacking dependencies though which ones? The following produces an error. x=linspace(0,pi,100) anim=@animate for i=0:100 y=sin(x*exp(i/50))

[julia-users] Pkg.status()

When calling Pkg.status() the first time it's telling me: julia> Pkg.status() INFO: Initializing package repository C:\cygwin64\home\Diger\.julia\v0.4 INFO: Cloning METADATA from git://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl error: could not lock config file

[julia-users] Re: new installation of julia

Hey thx for ur answer. Somewhere I read it is recommended more to compile it urself than using the precompiled binaries. Apart from that I tried once using them and it didnt work somehow. Or are u talking about the windows installer for me? Btw, does it have any effect after compiling and

Re: [julia-users] new installation of julia

> > Oh and what is the difference between make / make install > What do u need a make.user file for since I dont have it

[julia-users] new installation of julia

So, now I freshly compiled julia again from the source after I specified: git checkout release-0.4 but then inside Julia I get by typing versioninfo() Julia Version 0.4.0 Commit 0ff703b* (2015-10-08 06:20 UTC) Platform Info: System: Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU

[julia-users] Re: Pkg update

Sry, u mean 0.4.0???

[julia-users] Pkg update

julia> Pkg.update() INFO: Updating METADATA... INFO: Updating cache of Plots... INFO: Updating cache of Nemo... INFO: Updating cache of Measures... INFO: Updating cache of Blosc... INFO: Updating cache of BinDeps... INFO: Updating cache of JLD... INFO: Updating cache of StatsBase... INFO: Updating

Re: [julia-users] Annoying repl behaviour

Hm that solves it for the meantime. But you cant switch that behaviour off or? Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2016 21:42:12 UTC+2 schrieb Kristoffer Carlsson: > > If you press up while having characters to the left of the cursor I > believe you will be taken to the previous command that started with

Re: [julia-users] Annoying repl behaviour

> > That was not my intention..Just looking for a solution (while having been > a bit frustrated: Sorry) > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2016 21:14:24 UTC+2 schrieb Stefan Karpinski: > > Please don't swear on Julia forums. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, digxx <dige

[julia-users] Annoying repl behaviour

Usually u press "up" or "down" to get to what you have been typing in the repl before. This works so long u are not somewhere (with the cursor) in the middle of the word. If you then go "up" or "down" some weird symbol arises and additional "up" or "down" sends u to places u dont even remember

[julia-users] Re: @parallel while?

Maybe just to clarify: I suppose it is possible to spawn a while process on each worker separately. The problem is that when one worker finds a solution the other workers should stop too.

[julia-users] @parallel while?

Is there sth like @parallel while loop? Or is that even possible?

Re: [julia-users] Plots/pyplot

attributes/#magic-arguments > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com > > wrote: > >> HEy, Sorry for the maybe stupid question but apparently I'm not capable >> of setting the range when plotting with plots >> >&

[julia-users] Plots/pyplot

HEy, Sorry for the maybe stupid question but apparently I'm not capable of setting the range when plotting with plots so e.g. x=0:0.1:1 y=2*x plots(x,y,xaxis=(0,0.5) this does not work. and this deletes my xaxis labeling? plots(x,y,xasis=0:0.5) Anyway I just want to set range without

Re: [julia-users] Re: function! vs. function

> > Indeed embarassing -.- But yeah I was just confused thx anyway.

[julia-users] Re: function! vs. function

Thx evan. just to clarify: when calling: function f(a,farr) for i=1:n for j=1:n farr[j,i] = (a[j,:]*a[:,i] - A[j,:]*a[:,i])[1] - k2[j,i] end end end f(x) with my previously defined x I get an error while calling function f!(a,farr) for i=1:n for j=1:n farr[j,i] = (a[j,:]*a[:,i] -

[julia-users] Re: function! vs. function

the function I defined above? Or what do you mean? function f!(a,farr) for i=1:n for j=1:n farr[j,i] = (a[j,:]*a[:,i] - A[j,:]*a[:,i])[1] - k2[j,i] end end end

[julia-users] function! vs. function

So now I'm using this function A=[[2,1.]';[1,4]'] k2=Diagonal([3.,11.])^2 x=[[1,2]';[3.,4]'] farr=zeros(2,2) n=length(x[:,1]) kd(i,j)=Int64(i .== j) function f!(a,farr) for i=1:n for j=1:n #for k=1:n farr[j,i] = (a[j,:]*a[:,i] - A[j,:]*a[:,i])[1] - k2[j,i] #end end end end When I calculate

Re: [julia-users] Re: error in loop

Thx...

Re: [julia-users] Re: error in loop

I'm using Roots with fzero. Occasionally fzero(f,[a,b]) says its not a bracket. How can I first check for the error ?

[julia-users] Re: error in loop

In particular I would use this to then change the inital condition slightly and look if the root finding algorithm works better this time...

[julia-users] error in loop

I have a loop in which I have a root finding function. Sometimes the starting condition is not adequate and the function errors. Is it possible to somehow check first if the function errors before I actually run the function and then crashing the program.

[julia-users] zero divisor

Is there an algorithm to determine a zero divisor of a matrix?

Re: [julia-users] Differential Equations Package

Since Im not really up to date can anyone in 2 sentences explain to me what the issue with the package ODE.jl is? Is it the interface ppl dont like or what makes it so "redundant"?

Re: [julia-users] Differential Equations Package

Yes. I am. Am Dienstag, 7. Juni 2016 00:22:57 UTC+2 schrieb Stefan Karpinski: > > Are you talking about this package > https://github.com/ChrisRackauckas/DifferentialEquations.jl ? > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:04 PM, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com > > wrote: > >

[julia-users] Differential Equations Package

Hey all, I dont quite get the essence of this package. Looking through the examples I found for a 2d poisson type problem: Example problem with solution: ``u(x,y)= sin(2π.*x).*cos(2π.*y)/(8π*π)``" function poissonProblemExample_wave() f(x) = sin(2π.*x[:,1]).*cos(2π.*x[:,2]) sol(x) =

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

: > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:02 PM, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com > > wrote: > > maybe one more thing. How can I extract the number from this form > [0.1234... > > +- 12341e-12341] + i*0 to a normal number such that I can work with it > in > > later calcul

  1   2   >