Re: [julia-users] Base.Threads user feedback: it's great. please keep it. anyone tried hybrid (addprocs + Threads)?

There's no risk of threading being removed. It's only experimental, as per Yichao, in the sense that it's currently not ready for production use. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Yichao Yu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Florian Oswald >

Re: [julia-users] Base.Threads user feedback: it's great. please keep it. anyone tried hybrid (addprocs + Threads)?

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Florian Oswald wrote: > ok, thanks for that. do you think this is going to change already in v0.6 or > will that have to wait until a future release? There will be improvements but it's very likely still going to be experimental in 0.6.

Re: [julia-users] Base.Threads user feedback: it's great. please keep it. anyone tried hybrid (addprocs + Threads)?

ok, thanks for that. do you think this is going to change already in v0.6 or will that have to wait until a future release? On 14 November 2016 at 23:59, Yichao Yu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Florian Oswald > wrote: > > I'm not sure

Re: [julia-users] Base.Threads user feedback: it's great. please keep it. anyone tried hybrid (addprocs + Threads)?

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Florian Oswald wrote: > I'm not sure how many people are using Base.Threads out there, I came across > it by accident and think it works great. It's under the heading > "experimental" in the manual, so I just wanted to encourage the

[julia-users] Base.Threads user feedback: it's great. please keep it. anyone tried hybrid (addprocs + Threads)?

I'm not sure how many people are using Base.Threads out there, I came across it by accident and think it works great. It's under the heading "experimental" in the manual, so I just wanted to encourage the developers that this is a great feature, please don't drop it. I just wrote @threads in