[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-23 Thread Tony Kelman
Release candidate 3 is now available: https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang/bin/linux/x64/0.5/julia-0.5.0-rc3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang/bin/linux/x86/0.5/julia-0.5.0-rc3-linux-i686.tar.gz https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang/bin/osx/x64/0.5/julia-0.5.0-rc3-osx10.7+.dmg

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-20 Thread fncodr
Nice :) Slight (10% or so) performance regression in Tests.runAll() here: https://github.com/fncodr/tblous/blob/master/src/Tests.jl The linked code is mostly focusing on array allocation and copying, and the regression is consistent for several different code paths. /fncodr Den fredag 12

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-17 Thread Henri Girard
Ok, I did it again : 0.5 julia> tic(); using PyPlot; toc(); elapsed time: 8.14015376 seconds julia> tic(); using PyPlot; toc(); elapsed time: 0.000152792 seconds julia> 0.4.5 julia> tic(); using PyPlot; toc(); elapsed time: 5.030407122 seconds julia> tic(); using PyPlot; toc(); elapsed time:

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-17 Thread Uwe Fechner
Well, your test with 0.4.5 includes the time of the precompilation, your test with 0.5 rc2 not, so this is not a valid comparison. I compared only the time without precompilation, the second time of using the module, but after restarting julia. Uwe On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 2:32:42 PM

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-17 Thread Henri Girard
Thank you... The first one is my mistake when I copy it I started by the second line for the second one I will look further in the doc. (By the way I did your regression test : First is first time runing in julia second is straight after 0.4.5 julia> tic();using PyPlot;toc() INFO:

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-17 Thread Uwe Fechner
Hello, first, I had to move the line: gangoffourplot(P,tf(1)) after the line, where you define P. This plot works fine. Next, I can reproduce that stepplot(CLs) doesn't work. But it does not work on Julia 0.4.6 either, so this problem is not related to Julia 5.0 RC2. Uwe, Ubuntu 14.04, 64 bit

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-17 Thread Henri Girard
Using 0.5 RC2, this morning I couldn't get the second plot, the first is ok, but the second doesn't display, and worse even in julia console. I will try the regression test using ControlSystems, Plots gangoffourplot(P,tf(1)) J = 2.0 b = 0.04 K = 1.0 R = 0.08 L = 1e-4 # Create the model

Re: [julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-15 Thread Uwe Fechner
I created an issue regarding the performance regression loading precompiled packages: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/18030 Uwe On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 6:19:42 PM UTC+2, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Hello, > > sorry for the late reply. I did the profiling now, but on a different >

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-14 Thread Tomas Lycken
I just took the time to read the release notes more carefully, and I just want to congratulate everyone involved on a fantastic list of improvements. I've been away from the community for a little while, and

Re: [julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-13 Thread Yichao Yu
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Evan Fields wrote: > Thanks Tony. Two questions, one related to Uwe's question: > > 1) I noticed earlier that 0.5.0-rc0 starts up much faster than 0.4.6 but > is a little slower on initial function calls. > Likely due to LLVM's

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-13 Thread Cedric St-Jean
Langue changes: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/NEWS.md On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 7:51:39 AM UTC-4, Evan Fields wrote: > > Thanks Tony. Two questions, one related to Uwe's question: > > 1) I noticed earlier that 0.5.0-rc0 starts up much faster than 0.4.6 but > is a little

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-13 Thread Evan Fields
Thanks Tony. Two questions, one related to Uwe's question: 1) I noticed earlier that 0.5.0-rc0 starts up much faster than 0.4.6 but is a little slower on initial function calls. Does it load or precompile less of the standard library on startup? 2) Is there / will there be a list of important

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-12 Thread Tony Kelman
Could you try to profile and see where the time is spent? LLVM 3.7 (used on 0.5) is known to be significantly slower in compile time than LLVM 3.3 (used on 0.4). On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 8:52:42 AM UTC-7, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Thanks your hard work! > > Nevertheless I am a little bit

[julia-users] Re: ANN: Julia 0.5.0-rc2 now available

2016-08-12 Thread Uwe Fechner
Thanks your hard work! Nevertheless I am a little bit disappointed with the time, needed for including my own code. With Julia 0.5.0rc2 it needs 11.5 s, with Julia 0.4.6 it was only 6.34 s. Is this to be expected? I am using packages like PyPlot and JuMP, but I think they are precompiled. (On