I haven't gotten around to writing documentation yet, because I'm not quite
happy with the abstraction. If you give me a rough idea of what kind of
tree it is, I can probably tell you the right thing to do. The most basic
interface is just to return an iterator over a node's children from
Hello colleague,
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 6:38:31 PM UTC+2, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 2:45:12 AM UTC-4, Andreas Lobinger wrote:
>
> can someone please point me to some (more) documentation/packages about
>> handling tree structures in types?
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 2:45:12 AM UTC-4, Andreas Lobinger wrote:
>
> Hello colleagues,
>
> can someone please point me to some (more) documentation/packages about
> handling tree structures in types? AbstractTrees.jl leaves me a little bit
> alone without docu (yes, i've seen the