I read your blog and, as always, it has a distinctive courageous taste,
so I really hope you can attain your proposed goals!!!
Here follows my modest opinion (I'm not subscribed to blogspot).
I'm very sorry because I don't contribute to OJ at all, while you are
spending lots of energy in it!!!
Hi SS,
I think we should wait for Michael to respond. He may choose to do the
other workaround of converting LinearRings to LineStrings.
Larry
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Sunburned Surveyor
sunburned.surve...@gmail.com wrote:
If I get a build of the latest JTS CVS can we get replace
Ok Larry. I missed that part.
In the meantime I've got the CVS for JTS plumbed into my Eclipse
install and I'm currently working on getting the build file to run. So
I shouldn't have any problems building the new JTS jar file for the OJ
NB.
SS
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Larry Becker
well.. I would wait and include a final JTS version.
Btw. why do you think it will solve the graph bug?
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
If I get a build of the latest JTS CVS can we get replace the current
JTS library in our nightly build? I think this will fix the planar
graph bug that was
Hi Landon,
Every suggestion you make in your blogspot makes sense to me.
They are not easy tasks and I'm not particularly optimistic about our
ability to achieve only one of them, but let's say that tomorrow, we get
ten new contributors, ready to spend as much effort as you do on the
project
I want to respond in more detail to you and Paolo. Let me just say this for now:
- I'm not talking about rewriting every class in the core. That would
definitely be a major feat. I will likely only touch the code that I
interact with as part of my integration of the docking window
framework.
-
