Re: [JPP-Devel] How to find spikes with OpenJUMP?

2016-03-03 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, QA option do find spikes (but not inside corner). Removing spikes is another story. I had already to do that with JTS but it is a difficult problem because you can't make sure that removing a spike will not create an invalid polygon (auto-intersection). Would be nice to have something in

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: Any features added to openjump between versions 1.7.1 and 1.8.0 worth mentioning in the Project Overview?

2016-03-03 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
More than changes there must be some important bug fixes on up-to-come OJ 1.9.1 2016-03-02 23:05 GMT+01:00 Stefan Steiniger : > any comments? > I don't really now if you had major changes (e.g. renaming of functions... > but I don't think so) > > stefan > > Forwarded

Re: [JPP-Devel] How to find spikes with OpenJUMP?

2016-03-03 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hey, I couldn't find a standard tool either. So it would need to be via scripting. Interestingly in QA theres is an option to check for min angle... so what you want is the reverse. But I also don't know of a tool to fix that. Don't even remeber if I implemented something alike in the mapgen

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: Any features added to openjump between versions 1.7.1 and 1.8.0 worth mentioning in the Project Overview?

2016-03-03 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Ah good. If I saw correctly the doc is now on Github, means one can edit the text just online. will check that on the weekend. stefan On 3/3/16 07:19, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: I don’t think that anything essential is missing. Perhaps PDF as an outputformat. If we get 1.9 into LiveDVD

[JPP-Devel] How to find spikes with OpenJUMP?

2016-03-03 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, I would need a topology tool that could find and possibly remove spikes from geometries. I believe that a spike could be defined as an angle of <-179 degrees or >179 degrees between two adjacent segments. Any suggestions? -Jukka Rahkonen-

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: Any features added to openjump between versions 1.7.1 and 1.8.0 worth mentioning in the Project Overview?

2016-03-03 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
I don’t think that anything essential is missing. Perhaps PDF as an outputformat. If we get 1.9 into LiveDVD then Coordinate conversion is worth mentioning, as well as H2 Spatial and GeoPackage as input formats. -Jukka Rahkonen- Stefan Steiniger wrote: any comments? I don't really now if you