Re: [j-nsp] Re-write rule for GRE interface

2011-01-17 Thread Shiva Shankar
Hi All, Thanks for the reply. Platform is M7i, and the junos is 9.3 What i want to achieve is marking all the traffic leaving this GRE interface with a particular DSCP value, say EF. The content of the GRE packet is a layer 3 vpn datagram (IP datagram inside a MPLS packet)... here's the o/p:

[j-nsp] M20 SSB slot 0 failures

2011-01-17 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Hi, I have four M20 chassis with continuous slot 0 SSB failures. These are from two completely different vendors.. I would think, oh, a bad chassis, but I am getting this same result with a variety of chassis and SSB cards. I do have chassis that don't display this failure, with the same

Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?

2011-01-17 Thread Thedin Guruge
Hi, What i gather is that you have LDP implemented in MPLS level and edge routers are dual homed with core routers, why not consider running LDP over RSVP, RSVP LSPs will only be per link LSPs between P-PE links. RSVP will provide sub second failure times and no need for a dirty full meshed RSVP

Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?

2011-01-17 Thread Keegan Holley
I agree except for using the IGP and RSVP for failure detection. RSVP and OSPF/ISIS run in the control plane and BFD is designed to run in the forwarding plane. Running BFD will diagnose issues where the control plane is working but the forwarding plane is not. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:13 PM,

Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?

2011-01-17 Thread Phil Bedard
Oops I meant forwarding plane in my original post. In some of the older hardware where it's a centralized function and not independent of the control plane, it helps catch those failures as well. I believe this covers most Juniper hardware, unless I'm mistaken. Phil From: Keegan Holley

Re: [j-nsp] Re-write rule for GRE interface

2011-01-17 Thread Dale Shaw
Hi Shiva, On Monday, January 17, 2011, Shiva Shankar shanka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the reply. Platform is M7i, and the junos is 9.3 [...] How are you classifying traffic into the forwarding classes in the first place? The rewrite-rule assumes traffic has been classified

Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?

2011-01-17 Thread Keegan Holley
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:57 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I agree except for using the IGP and RSVP for failure detection. RSVP and OSPF/ISIS run in the control plane and BFD is designed to run in the forwarding plane. Running BFD will diagnose issues where the control plane is

Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?

2011-01-17 Thread Daniel Verlouw
On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Keegan Holley wrote: Of course I can't find the link now, but just last night I read that prior to JunOS 9.4 echo mode required a command to be entered in order to move BFD to the forwarding plane. In or after 9.4 a new daemon was created to allow BFD to run in

Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?

2011-01-17 Thread Colin House
On 18/01/2011 9:50 AM, Keegan Holley wrote: ... In or after 9.4 a new daemon was created to allow BFD to run in the forwarding plane and that became the default. I don't have time now but I will post the link later. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Re-write rule for GRE interface

2011-01-17 Thread Diogo Montagner
Hi, You can also try to apply an output firewall filter in the gre interface to rewrite the DSCP of the packet. I think the option copy-tos-to-outer-ip-header will not work because your inner packet is not an IP packet and this option only works for inner IP packet. If this does not work, you

Re: [j-nsp] Offline config verification

2011-01-17 Thread Phil Shafer
Jared Mauch writes: Just load them on the device and rollback and use commit-check as your middle step. There's also the test configuration command: user@cli test configuration server:cli.conf cli.conf 100% 29KB 28.6KB/s 00:00