Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue

2011-03-08 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Thanks, Now HA is configured, but regarding the fab link, is it necessary to have L3 address or not. BR, -Original Message- From: Ben Dale [mailto:bd...@comlinx.com.au] Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 12:12 PM To: Walaa Abdel razzak Cc: Scott T. Cameron; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [j-nsp] Scripting - Redefining variables in For-each Loops

2011-03-08 Thread ben b
sweet thanks! works like a charm On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Curtis Call wrote: > > > > I have need to add the values calculated inside of a for-each loop. > > Has anyone ever had to do that? > > > > Example of what I want > > for-each ( $result ) { > > $a = . + 1; > > $b = $b + a;

Re: [j-nsp] Scripting - Redefining variables in For-each Loops

2011-03-08 Thread Curtis Call
> > I have need to add the values calculated inside of a for-each loop. > Has anyone ever had to do that? > > Example of what I want > for-each ( $result ) { > $a = . + 1; > $b = $b + a; > } > You'll need to split this into multiple steps: var $values := { for-each( $result ) {

[j-nsp] Scripting - Redefining variables in For-each Loops

2011-03-08 Thread ben b
Experts, I'm in the process of not liking that you can't redefine variables in slax. I have need to add the values calculated inside of a for-each loop. Has anyone ever had to do that? Example of what I want for-each ( $result ) { $a = . + 1; $b = $b + a; } $result could be 200 resu

Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs J-Series for HA over Layer2

2011-03-08 Thread Ben Dale
No - the fabric link is untagged, so you can drop it into any VLAN on the switch side - just remember to adjust MTU as necessary. Cheers, Ben On 08/03/2011, at 8:50 PM, Pierre-Yves Maunier wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for the infos, > > I was trying to find out which vlan to us in the first

Re: [j-nsp] Router with lots of layer 3 interfaces

2011-03-08 Thread Pavel Lunin
My question with that setup is: how many VRRP instances can I have on an > SRX? > VRRP does not scale well on any platform because of the protocol limitation and due to CPU-intensive hellos. Max number of groups is 256. Although theoretically this limit is a concern only in case of a single broadc

Re: [j-nsp] RPM Event Script - Attributes Help

2011-03-08 Thread ben b
cool, thanks for that! I was pulling that information later in the script anyway, might as well do it earlier. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Curtis Call wrote: > > I'm writing an event-script based on RPM threshold exceeds/failures and > > can't seem to find the passed attributes any

Re: [j-nsp] RPM Event Script - Attributes Help

2011-03-08 Thread Curtis Call
> I'm writing an event-script based on RPM threshold exceeds/failures and > can't seem to find the passed attributes anywhere. I found "{$$.test- > name}" > online, but nothing else. I'm looking for the rtt-jitter and rrt-max- > delay values so I can pass them to the script. Anyone out there kno

Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs J-Series for HA over Layer2

2011-03-08 Thread Pavel Lunin
My 2 cents. 2011/3/8 Ben Dale > > Yes this can be done - control link traffic on the branch SRXs is actually > sent 802.1Q tagged in VLAN 4094, so you'll need to make the interface you > plug into the control link a trunk on your EX. > > As I've mentioned a couple of days ago in some of the nei

Re: [j-nsp] Difference between M320 and T320

2011-03-08 Thread Julien Goodwin
On 09/03/11 00:48, Jose Sanchez wrote: > Does someone knows the difference between the M320 and the T320? > > I know that the T320 does not accept Type 1 FPC, but beyond that I don't > know any differences, maybe something in the internal architecture? The T320 is a bit shorter, and only takes tw

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue

2011-03-08 Thread ben b
I've run into pre-config issues as well. You can delete each section like below, but I normally delete the entire config and replace it with node 0's config. This way the 2 configs are the exact same when first clustering. On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Ben Dale wrote: > This is a pretty com

[j-nsp] RPM Event Script - Attributes Help

2011-03-08 Thread ben b
Experts, I'm writing an event-script based on RPM threshold exceeds/failures and can't seem to find the passed attributes anywhere. I found "{$$.test-name}" online, but nothing else. I'm looking for the rtt-jitter and rrt-max-delay values so I can pass them to the script. Anyone out there know

Re: [j-nsp] Difference between M320 and T320

2011-03-08 Thread Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
M320 is a pretty new router architecture that uses I-CHIP. It supports now new Routing Engines with Dual Quad Processors and 32 GB DRAM ... I think. Do you need what kind of interfaces ? ATM, Sonet, TDM ? SDH ? Or only ethernet ? Maybe you can think about MX480 or MX960 family for ethernet

Re: [j-nsp] Allow BGp loops

2011-03-08 Thread Harry Reynolds
I think you need to specify tolerance for as path loops at the global/main instance routing options. It will therefore affect all bgp in all instances. HTHs -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of meryem Z

Re: [j-nsp] Difference between M320 and T320

2011-03-08 Thread Doug Hanks
If you're looking at these two products and need to make a purchase, I would definitely suggest to contact your account team. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose Sanchez Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011

[j-nsp] Allow BGp loops

2011-03-08 Thread meryem Z
Hello Community , on an M320 router running junos 9.6 I had a problem of BGP routes hidden due to BGP loops. So i used the command "set routing-instances protocols bgp local-as loops 2" to allow loops. but then i got the following error message : 'local-as' Invalid loop count configured er

Re: [j-nsp] Difference between M320 and T320

2011-03-08 Thread cristian . frizziero
Hi Jose, M320 is the first M-Series router to be built with the same architecture of a T-Serie router. About the desing details I have no way to give you more info, but foundamentally, it has a switch fabric made with 6 SIBs, the forwarding plane is based on I-Chip engine-lookup. Really I think t

Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs J-Series for HA over Layer2

2011-03-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Maunier
Just for info about the fabric link if this could help someone, After my tests, any standard vlan work for the fabric link (configured in access mode on the switches) with a mtu which allow jumbo frames (I put 9216). igmp-snooping disabled too. Thanks all for your replies. Regards, -- Pierre-Yv

[j-nsp] Difference between M320 and T320

2011-03-08 Thread Jose Sanchez
Hi guys, Does someone knows the difference between the M320 and the T320? I know that the T320 does not accept Type 1 FPC, but beyond that I don't know any differences, maybe something in the internal architecture? Thanks Jose ___ juniper-nsp mailing

Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs J-Series for HA over Layer2

2011-03-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Maunier
Hello, thanks for the infos, I was trying to find out which vlan to us in the first link Laurens gave me but the infos is not in the document. My first tests was with igmp snooping disabled but with the switch ports in access mode in a standard vlan. Using trunk mode with vlan 4094 now works wel

Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs J-Series for HA over Layer2

2011-03-08 Thread Ben Dale
Almost forgot - make sure IGMP snooping is turned off on both VLANs as well. On 08/03/2011, at 7:32 PM, Ben Dale wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Yes this can be done - control link traffic on the branch SRXs is actually > sent 802.1Q tagged in VLAN 4094, so you'll need to make the interface you > plug

Re: [j-nsp] SRX vs J-Series for HA over Layer2

2011-03-08 Thread Ben Dale
Hi Pierre, Yes this can be done - control link traffic on the branch SRXs is actually sent 802.1Q tagged in VLAN 4094, so you'll need to make the interface you plug into the control link a trunk on your EX. I would also recommend that you increase the MTU size of both your fabric links (and