Stefan,
I see. If policer counts in the IPv4 header as well, it would do
(51021*28)/(1024*1024)=1.4MB which is rather close to 71.5-69.8=1.7MB.
Could you please explain this larger buffer to smooth things out
argument? As I understand, in simple terms, larger buffer is able to
hold larger amount
All,
I am trying to find some third-party SFP to run 100/1000BaseT on the EX.
So far I can get either 100M or 1000M - but not both in the same SFP.
Anyone have a tip on a working model?
--
Bjørn Tore
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 12:07:19PM +0200, Bjørn Tore wrote:
I am trying to find some third-party SFP to run 100/1000BaseT on the EX. So
far I can get either 100M or 1000M - but not both in the same SFP. Anyone
have a tip on a working model?
Yes, you are looking for EX-SFP-1GE-T by official Juniper pricelist - but
sometimes there are other part numbers that will look something like
SFP-1GE-FE-E-T for example indicating tri-rate copper optic.
Would contact your 3rd party vendor and ask them though - Prolabs (which we
just began using
Hi all,
I need some advice.
We are currently in a process of upgrading our Juniper MX960 series routers.
Some of our customers are not able to transmit traffic after we performed
maintenance.
Circuits are connected as Layer2 circuit with ethernet-ccc configuration.
It seems circuits are hanging
Thanks for the reply, Chris.
On 4/6/11, Chris Tracy ctr...@es.net wrote:
Our Juniper rep gave us a 4-slide PPT showing how cflowd v9 was configured
before and after 9.6 -- you might want to ask if they can share this with
you. One thing that has been added 9.6 is the ability to do per-FPC
Hi George,
Actually my problem is how to identify it rather than looking at monitor
interface ge-x/x/x output for every single interface.
Because shut/ no shut is fixing my problem without changing vlan on customer
end.
Thanks and regards,
Gokhan Gumus
2011/4/7 George Vlachos
What does your policer config look like? I've seen some links have problems
with large packet sizes if the burst was set too low. Also, I think the
iperf packet loss calculation also counts some kind of internal buffering
loss. I'm couldn't find it on google but I remember reading something a
Hello, somebody could help us to get the maximum bgp ipv4 routes for a m10i
with RE850 and 1536 MB? We tried to searching at juniper website but we do not
find.
Best Regards,
Edinson M. Serrano Samacá
Mobile: 5544483952
-Mensaje original-
De: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hello,
Some of our customers are not able to transmit traffic after we performed
maintenance.
Circuits are connected as Layer2 circuit with ethernet-ccc configuration.
It seems circuits are hanging off. It is not a negotiation issue first of
all.
What version are you coming from and going to? I
People,
Does anyone here on this list can confirm to me the correct use of
JUNIPER EX3, EX4 and EX8 (JUNOS 11.1) platforms, configured with q-in-q
vlans in a mixed environment together with cisco catalyst 3750G ?
It works without any problems ? its possible to send to list or for me
in pvt
AFAIK, RIB capacity (IPv4) for RE-850-1536 is ~6M.
Thanks Regards
Tarique Abbas Nalkhande
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Serrano Samaca,
Edinson (EXT-Other - MX/Mexico City)
Sent: 07 April, 2011
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Serrano Samaca, Edinson (EXT-Other -
MX/Mexico City) edinson.serrano_samaca@nsn.com wrote:
Hello, somebody could help us to get the maximum bgp ipv4 routes for a m10i
with RE850 and 1536 MB? We tried to searching at juniper website but we do
not find.
Hello Tarike thanks for your response.
But I want to be more specific:
***I have a m10i Route-reflector with 2'090.000 Internet routes.
show route summary
inet.0: 6187 destinations, 6187 routes (6187 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 4 routes, 4 active
Hi all,
Anyone here uses policers on LAGs with member interfaces, bound to
different PFE? MX Trio in my case, but same for i-chip would also be
interesting.
There is some rumor that in such a case policer rate is individually
applied several times to each of the member interfaces meaning
From what I remember when testing this the EX would not pass CDP packets and
we had to change the default ether-type from 0x9100 to 0x8100. Below is a
quick setup and configs:
cisco_sw1 -- Juniper_ex4200 -- Cisco_sw1 -- Cisco_sw3
On the Juniper
!
show configuration ethernet-switching-options
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:40:59PM +0400, Pavel Lunin wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone here uses policers on LAGs with member interfaces, bound to
different PFE? MX Trio in my case, but same for i-chip would also be
interesting.
There is some rumor that in such a case policer rate is
PS: those observations were done on older M320 and I-chip based
MX-series. Do not have Trio-based devices, so may be I'm wrong here.
Still do not believe that intrachip communications were introduced
to aid exact policing anyway.
Thanks. Actually I figured out myself with help from the local
Hi again,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Dale Shaw dale.shaw+j-...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed on EX-series, the fans go from 'spinning at normal speed'
to 'spinning at high speed' on a regular schedule even when the
ambient temperature hasn't significantly changed and the box isn't
19 matches
Mail list logo
