Re: [j-nsp] 3rd optics on MX/EX/SRX

2013-06-27 Thread Fearghas McKay
Gavin On 26 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Gavin Henry ghe...@suretec.co.uk wrote: Ours arrived this week and works on a Linux desktop :-) Nice idea too buying credits for 0.25 cents to reconfigure. You only need credits for 1G optics - the 1G are free to reprogram. Once an optic has been configured to

Re: [j-nsp] 3rd optics on MX/EX/SRX

2013-06-27 Thread Gavin Henry
On 27 June 2013 09:27, Fearghas McKay fearg...@gmail.com wrote: Gavin On 26 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Gavin Henry ghe...@suretec.co.uk wrote: Ours arrived this week and works on a Linux desktop :-) Nice idea too buying credits for 0.25 cents to reconfigure. You only need credits for 1G optics -

Re: [j-nsp] 3rd optics on MX/EX/SRX

2013-06-27 Thread Jared Mauch
Robert, Make sure that in future requests to your vendors you ask about pluggable optics support of SFF-8472. These are all in a standard location and should be populated for the optics to be compliant. - jared On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I have

[j-nsp] EX2200 Series

2013-06-27 Thread Bill Blackford
I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular, anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in particular, a mixed vendor environment. Feel free to ping me off-line. Thank you -- Bill Blackford Logged into reality and abusing my sudo

Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series

2013-06-27 Thread Doug McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:09:16PM -0700, Bill Blackford wrote: I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular, anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in particular, a mixed vendor environment. I've used the EX2200's, and aside from the

Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series

2013-06-27 Thread Paulhamus, Jon
We have well approximately 75 of the 2200's and closer to 250 of the 4200's / 4500's either standalone or in VC. A few bugs along the way with earlier code - but now we've stuck with 11.4R5.7 code and all is well. I've mixed the 2200's with mostly Cisco, and 3com / HP and have had no

Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series

2013-06-27 Thread Bill Blackford
Any features specifically that you're curios about? Has anyone done/used the VC feature? How stable is it? Does it function in a similar manner to that of the EX4200's? How do they handle the loss of a member? These will be closet stacks, so little need for any L3 functionality. However, in the

Re: [j-nsp] RPD queue stall, RIB/FIB programming time fixed in 11.4R8?

2013-06-27 Thread Richard Hesse
Nope. In fact it seems even worse than ever in 11.4R8. -richard On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger juniper-...@ml.karotte.org wrote: Hello, reading PR836197 and KB26792, it seems that the RPD queue starving/stalling was improved (even fixed?) in 11.4R8, 12.1X45-D10,

Re: [j-nsp] KRT queue stalls fixed in 11.4R8?

2013-06-27 Thread Richard Hesse
Is this the one that's exacerbated by sampling? If so, it's still not fixed in 11.4R8. -richard On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger juniper-...@ml.karotte.org wrote: * Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl [2013-06-24 21:57]: On 24-06-13 21:07, Rob Foehl wrote:

[j-nsp] RIB and FIB - Memory for MX with LR

2013-06-27 Thread Giuliano Medalha
People, Thinking about configuring 2 Logical Systems in a MX480 box with RE1800X4, how can we provide control for memory allocation ? The box has the following configuration: 2 x RE1800X4-16GB 1 x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B 2 x SCBE-MX Is it possible to control the RIB and the FIB size using JUNOS

Re: [j-nsp] RIB and FIB - Memory for MX with LR

2013-06-27 Thread joel jaeggli
On 6/27/13 8:14 PM, Giuliano Medalha wrote: People, Thinking about configuring 2 Logical Systems in a MX480 box with RE1800X4, how can we provide control for memory allocation ? The box has the following configuration: 2 x RE1800X4-16GB 1 x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B 2 x SCBE-MX Is it possible to