Gavin
On 26 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Gavin Henry ghe...@suretec.co.uk wrote:
Ours arrived this week and works on a Linux desktop :-) Nice idea too
buying credits for 0.25 cents to reconfigure.
You only need credits for 1G optics - the 1G are free to reprogram. Once an
optic has been configured to
On 27 June 2013 09:27, Fearghas McKay fearg...@gmail.com wrote:
Gavin
On 26 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Gavin Henry ghe...@suretec.co.uk wrote:
Ours arrived this week and works on a Linux desktop :-) Nice idea too
buying credits for 0.25 cents to reconfigure.
You only need credits for 1G optics -
Robert,
Make sure that in future requests to your vendors you ask about pluggable
optics support of SFF-8472.
These are all in a standard location and should be populated for the optics to
be compliant.
- jared
On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have
I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular,
anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in
particular, a mixed vendor environment.
Feel free to ping me off-line.
Thank you
--
Bill Blackford
Logged into reality and abusing my sudo
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:09:16PM -0700, Bill Blackford wrote:
I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular,
anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in
particular, a mixed vendor environment.
I've used the EX2200's, and aside from the
We have well approximately 75 of the 2200's and closer to 250 of the 4200's /
4500's either standalone or in VC. A few bugs along the way with earlier
code - but now we've stuck with 11.4R5.7 code and all is well. I've mixed the
2200's with mostly Cisco, and 3com / HP and have had no
Any features specifically that you're curios about?
Has anyone done/used the VC feature? How stable is it? Does it function in
a similar manner to that of the EX4200's? How do they handle the loss of a
member?
These will be closet stacks, so little need for any L3 functionality.
However, in the
Nope. In fact it seems even worse than ever in 11.4R8.
-richard
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger
juniper-...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
Hello,
reading PR836197 and KB26792, it seems that the RPD queue
starving/stalling was improved (even fixed?) in 11.4R8, 12.1X45-D10,
Is this the one that's exacerbated by sampling? If so, it's still not fixed
in 11.4R8.
-richard
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger
juniper-...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
* Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl [2013-06-24 21:57]:
On 24-06-13 21:07, Rob Foehl wrote:
People,
Thinking about configuring 2 Logical Systems in a MX480 box with RE1800X4,
how can we provide control for memory allocation ?
The box has the following configuration:
2 x RE1800X4-16GB
1 x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B
2 x SCBE-MX
Is it possible to control the RIB and the FIB size using JUNOS
On 6/27/13 8:14 PM, Giuliano Medalha wrote:
People,
Thinking about configuring 2 Logical Systems in a MX480 box with RE1800X4,
how can we provide control for memory allocation ?
The box has the following configuration:
2 x RE1800X4-16GB
1 x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B
2 x SCBE-MX
Is it possible to
11 matches
Mail list logo