Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 163, Issue 24

> On 21/06/2016, at 05:05, Mohammad Salbad wrote: > > Try to set statistics under the sub interfaces I presume this was in response to my message. Thanks for that - we found the same thing subsequently. Waiting for feedback on why this is required - perhaps there is a

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Hum ... I think in ACX you will need to explicit use statistics command ... set interfaces xe-0/0/1 statistics Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 98112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/ ​ WZTECH is registered

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Yeah, strange my subinterface doesn't show any packets out, but the phy int shows currently 17 mbps going out right now... Maybe these counters are broken on the subint... I tried walking with snmp but I still didn't see any traffic for the subinterface used on the l2circuit

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Just fyi about protecting I've got v4 and v6 mpls l3vpn (6vpe) dual stacked on my acx5048 and I've accomplished protecting control plane from external ssh for public ipv4 and ipv6 addresses and also from local customers hitting fe80::/10 link local on subscriber facing irb Seems to be

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > If JNPR would list them, people might unfairly assume vendor who does > not, is superior. > > We really should have community pages documenting devices and their > limitations. Like dpreview for networking kit :/ I would love such

Re: [j-nsp] health-monitor as the cause?

Please not response, Publishing again? 2016-06-16 16:18 GMT-03:00 Gabriel Farias : > Message: health-monitor as the cause? > > Hello members, > > > There are many options to monitor the health of Juniper equipment with > Junos, the record of events usually are via snmp

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Hi Saku, I agree having a small db with features limitations and scalability will be great and saves us lot of headache. regards santi > On 20 Jun 2016, at 10:12, Saku Ytti wrote: > > I'm not pointing at JNPR, other vendors do it too. But these > cheap/dense boxes have tons of

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

I'm not pointing at JNPR, other vendors do it too. But these cheap/dense boxes have tons of things that don't work, and can't work and there isn't any clean nice page which lists all gotchas. I think it's marketing, marketing fears that if all non-working stuff is listed, people won't buy the kit,

Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 163, Issue 24

Try to set statistics under the sub interfaces Regards M. Salbad ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Le 20/06/2016 à 06:03, Nathan Ward a écrit : Hi all, I’m deploying some ACX5048 boxes, doing l2circuits from subinterfaces off to BNGs and so on. We’re wanting to get counters for each l2circuit, or each subinterface, but as soon as a an l2circuit is attached to a subint, we lose all

[j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Hi all, I’m deploying some ACX5048 boxes, doing l2circuits from subinterfaces off to BNGs and so on. We’re wanting to get counters for each l2circuit, or each subinterface, but as soon as a an l2circuit is attached to a subint, we lose all counters. We can achieve what we want, more or less,