Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

2023-12-13 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 03:58:00PM +, Jackson, William via juniper-nsp wrote: > We have had to send to the clients via DHCP a set of /32 host routes to > circumvent this problem. If you are able to configure the clients with /32 routes via DHCP, why don't you just configure the clients with

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

2023-10-25 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 03:12:29PM +0200, Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp wrote: > On 10/25/23 10:57, Sebastian Wiesinger via juniper-nsp wrote: > > Yeah it depends. Our MX204 also needed licenses for subscriber > > managment. Some options would produce a license warning and some other > > stuff just

Re: [j-nsp] Multirate SFP+ in EX?

2023-02-13 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
Not sure, but if there is a way, it might be configured under "set chassis pic ...", perhaps something like this: sst chassis pic fpc-slot 0 pic-slot 1 port 0 speed 10g On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 09:23:10AM -0600, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote: > I have an old Juniper EX4500 (working on

Re: [j-nsp] Cannot program filter pfe-cos-cl-631-5-1 (type VFP_IL2L3_COS) -TCAM has 0 free entries

2022-10-21 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:50:55PM -0400, Jonathen Landis wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 9:59 AM Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > I lost a fight with JTAC about whether the TCAM exhausting filter > should be a commit failure or not. > > In lieu of failing the commit, would it make sense

Re: [j-nsp] Cannot program filter pfe-cos-cl-631-5-1 (type VFP_IL2L3_COS) -TCAM has 0 free entries

2022-10-13 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
ilter state > > 0 multicast statistics support > > > > More details extracted from the full "show filter hw all" output: > > > > == > > Filter index : 46137374 > > == > > > > - Filter name : pfe-cos-cl-624-5-1 > > Filte

Re: [j-nsp] Cannot program filter pfe-cos-cl-631-5-1 (type VFP_IL2L3_COS) -TCAM has 0 free entries

2022-10-12 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
ntries needed : 1 Total hardware instances: 1 == > On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 05:33, Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > > > Has anyone seen these errors and know what the cause is? > > > > Oct 11 21:41:02 ex4300-48mp fpc0 DFWE ERROR DFW:

[j-nsp] Cannot program filter pfe-cos-cl-631-5-1 (type VFP_IL2L3_COS) -TCAM has 0 free entries

2022-10-11 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
Has anyone seen these errors and know what the cause is? Oct 11 21:41:02 ex4300-48mp fpc0 DFWE ERROR DFW: Filter : "pfe-cos-cl-624-5-1" is NOT programmed in HW Oct 11 21:41:02 ex4300-48mp fpc0 DFWE ERROR DFW: Filter : "pfe-cos-cl-626-5-1" is NOT programmed in HW Oct 11 21:41:02 ex4300-48mp

Re: [j-nsp] port-mirror with source inside routing-instance type vrf

2022-10-11 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
Did you try creating a static ARP entry for the port mirroring destination? interfaces { xe-0/0/4:2 { vlan-tagging; mtu 9192; encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services; unit 3124 { description "mirror test"; vlan-id 3124;

Re: [j-nsp] Outgrowing a QFX5100

2022-09-20 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
Why would you want DHCP snooping or dot1x on a campus core router? Those functions are typically implemented at the access layer switches connected directly to end users. On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:11:22PM -0400, Jason Healy via juniper-nsp wrote: > We're a small school campus that's been

Re: [j-nsp] RPD coring today?

2022-09-17 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 06:21:51PM -0400, Jared Mauch via juniper-nsp wrote: > Anyone else see their RPD start to core today? Seeing something weird, > unclear if it’s local to my network or otherwise but two devices at the same > time seem to be having trouble, so puzzling. > > Running

[j-nsp] set-style config output format is missing some aspects of the configuration

2022-05-18 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
"show configuration | display set" is missing some aspects of the configuration, namely annotations (comments). What else is it missing? Would Juniper please consider making the entire configuration representable in set-style format, including annotations? It is handy for example to annotate

Re: [j-nsp] QFX VC as part of EVPN - redundancy not working

2021-10-05 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
I recommend you do not use VC at all, and instead use ESI-LAG for the server-facing links. On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 11:43:23AM +, Giovanni Bellac via juniper-nsp wrote: > Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:43:23 + (UTC) > From: Giovanni Bellac > To: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" > Subject: QFX VC

Re: [j-nsp] ISSU offlined mpc - why?

2021-09-01 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:44:08AM -0700, Mike via juniper-nsp wrote: > "Unified ISSU is supported with Junos OS Release 17.4R1 for MX Series > routers with MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP" > >     my expectations were that the card would stay online and there > would be little to no operational impact, but

Re: [j-nsp] Looking for Hints: Best Practices to PUSH prefix-list on MX platform with 16.x and UP

2021-08-12 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
I've done this with perl scripts and the Juniper NETCONF libraries. I make the changes inside a configuration group which is inherited into the actual prefix-list(s), then lock down the account so it is only able to make changes to that configuration group. groups { AUTO-PREFIX-LIST {

Re: [j-nsp] upgrading an antique 240

2021-07-16 Thread Chuck Anderson via juniper-nsp
In my experience 17.3R3-Sx also works with RE-2000, original SCB-MX, and MPC line cards, although I don't know about support for DPC cards. On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:57:19AM -0400, Alain Hebert via juniper-nsp wrote: >     Boot using a USB key and the proper image. > >