;
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> --
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
ion,
> dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and delete the material from any computer, including any copies.
> ___
ondering if anyone has seen anything similar ?
>
> Many thanks
>
> JfD.
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
all { apply-path "protocols bgp
>> group <*> neighbor <*>"; }
>>
>> I can use pf_BGP-all in a filter in a family inet filter and a family
>> inet6 filter.
>>
>> My question is- does it matter that a v6 address is in a prefix list
>> in a v4 filter
a completly another router, it has his own rpd process
You have to create all the interfaces (including loopback) for the
instance, and specify his addresses into it.
—
Eduardo Schoedler
> --
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@
John,
Another one:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wtflow-you-really-still-paying-commercial-solutions-collect-cowart
Regards,
2017-05-22 17:42 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Schoedler :
> Hi John,
>
> You can try this:
> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2017-May/091097.html
t; juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
l handle 1M of routes in FIB ?
>
> Rob
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
any way that JUNOS on an MX could configured to do this?
> Enhancement request anyone?
>
>
> Clarke Morledge
> College of William and Mary
> Information Technology - Network Engineering
> Jones Hall (Room 18)
> Williamsburg VA 23187
> ______
# apply-path was expanded to:
## 192.168.0.0/30;
## 10.8.0.0/31;
## 192.0.2.0/26;
## 192.0.2.64/26;
## 10.3.255.1/32;
## 172.19.90.0/23;
##
apply-path "interfaces <*> unit <*> family inet address <*>";
Em qua, 22 de mar de 2017 às 15:00, Eduardo Schoedler
e
have you tried to do a prefix-list like this?
{master}[edit]
regress@R1-RE0# *show policy-options | no-more*
prefix-list router-ipv4 {
apply-path "interfaces <*> unit <*> family inet address <*>";
}
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em seg, 20 de mar de 2017 às 06:24,
__
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
2017-03-13 19:41 GMT-03:00 Pedro :
> Hello,
Hi,
> There is support for ipv6 multihop in junos for eBGP ? I don't have L2 or
> direct link between ipv6 peers.. ( now i have junos 15.1R2.9 and
> 14.1X53-D40.8)
Yes, it is:
set neighbor 2001:db8::1 multihop ttl xx
Regards,
--
ou help me. Can you tell me where is the mistake, or what I forget ?
>
> Thank you !
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
r-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
ll exist even if they are inactive. (see the advertise-inactive
> knob).
>
>> On Jul 4, 2016, at 9:02 PM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
>>
>> Can I announce all prefixes from main table in a bgp session that is
>> into a routing-instance? I can't leak the prefixe
Can I announce all prefixes from main table in a bgp session that is
into a routing-instance? I can't leak the prefixes, only advertise
them, because it's a looking glass session, like Routeviews.
All tips are welcome.
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Eduardo
}
}
routing-instances {
TRANSPORT {
instance-type vpls;
vlan-id 666;
routing-interface irb.666;
protocols {
vpls {
no-tunnel-services;
vpls-id 1122;
neighbor 172.16.1.1;
connectivity-type irb;
mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
extensive no-forwarding
last pid: 43314; load averages: 0.25, 0.17, 0.11 up 87+15:53:0816:51:13
145 processes: 6 running, 112 sleeping, 27 waiting
Mem: 1293M Active, 96M Inact, 330M Wired, 241M Cache, 112M Buf, 23M Free
Swap: 2821M Total, 2821M Free
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2016-04-26 16:44
Hi Colton,
Yes, it's very high but it's working ok :)
3 full tables (~580k each) + 4x IXP route-server (~60k each) + 1
peering with HE (81k).
Indeed, convergence it's terrible... for my luck, these sessions are
pretty stable.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2016-04-26 15:46 GMT-03:
3 routes, 3 active
Local: 2 routes, 2 active
OSPF:208 routes,208 active
BGP: 195529 routes, 110283 active
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.
arafından taranmıştır. Ancak SPDNET, bu e-postanın - virüs koruma sistemleri
> ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virüs içermediğini garanti etmez ve meydana
> gelebilecek zararlardan doğacak hiçbir sorumluluğu kabul etmez.
> ___
> junip
to lo0 should do the trick
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Did you cloned VM? Did you change the mac-address?
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2016-03-21 16:32 GMT-03:00 serge vautour :
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to everyone who replied with suggestions.
>
> I did not have any licenses installed. Oddly enough VMX2 was showing:
>
> user@LabVMX2> sho
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-02-22 13:19 GMT-03:00 Job Snijders :
> Hi list,
>
> Upgraded this morning to 14.2R2.8 and I noticed that /var/log/messages
> is being blasted with all kinds of messages which have no meaning to me.
>
> Other then high memory usage, the box seems to operate fine
> Is there any Juniper equipment which is able to do this?
>
>
> thanks,
> Martin
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
Aaron,
Sorry, correct command is:
show ethernet-switching table
After you apply the filter, it is still in the table?
Thank you.
Em quarta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2015, Eduardo Schoedler <
lis...@esds.com.br> escreveu:
> If you do "show arp no-resolve", does it sh
it would really stop traffic.
>
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> From: Eduardo Schoedler [mailto:lis...@esds.com.br]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 1:47 PM
> To: Aaron
>
>
> Cc: Juniper List
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MAC filter on EX switches
>
>
>
> Aaron,
>
>
; ___________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
You can try generate:
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos14.2/topics/topic-map/policy-generated-route.html
Maybe slax too.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em segunda-feira, 12 de outubro de 2015, Fabien Leboedec <
fleboe...@afone.com> escreveu:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I need yo
Hi people,
I've made a mistake and bricked one J4350.
Someone who has one J-series running can provide me one rescue image
(system snapshot)?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nethe
my opinion, and I think the monolithic design of rpd should be
> rethinked.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Raphael Mazelier
>
>
> _______
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
Hi @thiyagarajan,
I don't know.
I think all MX are 2GB RAM, there are not requisites.
Just download junos and install.
Only what you need to know is what features you want to use on the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-04-16 11:33 GMT-03:00 thiyagarajan b :
> @Eduardo. What will be th
If you are thinking in run flows, I strongly recommend 13.3R6.
With 12.3 I found too much bugs, including one who have killed my rpd and
take down all routing in the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em quinta-feira, 16 de abril de 2015, thiyagarajan b <
bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com> escreveu:
&g
Try set "filter-specific" in the policer.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em domingo, 12 de abril de 2015, Cydon Satyr
escreveu:
> Juniper documentation mentions that regular srTC policer applied in regular
> firewall filter will be shared among all interfaces that use that filter
> (
Try CCC:
https://mellowd.co.uk/ccie/?p=4428
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington
escreveu:
> Eduardo,
>
> I have tried the following for encapsulation on the ingress port. The
> vpls connections are down...one in the LD status and the othe
_
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
ehavior? Shouldn't
> both routers install two routes as inactive into inet.0 table?
>
> Regards
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
--
Eduardo Schoed
Not inline j-flow will kill your box.
--
Eduardo
2015-01-26 13:03 GMT-02:00 John Brown :
> Hi Raphael, I curious as why you are using software flow. I thought
> the inline was better from a performance perspective on the router..
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Raphael Mazelier
> wrote:
ute Record Count: 516479, IPv6 Route Record Count: 4
> Route Record Count: 516483, AS Record Count: 143756
> Route-Records Set: Yes, Config Set: Yes
>
> # run show services accounting flow inline-jflow
> Flow information
> TFEB Slot: 0
> Flow Packets: 1445
13:07 GMT-02:00 Scott Granados :
> Mikrotek, ouch, the only thing I found they were good for is target
> practice.:)
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
>
> Em quarta-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2014, Jordan Whited
> escreveu:
>>
>> I found t
full ipv4 with ~250k active-paths, in
> 12.3R8.7 I measured it closer to 3 minutes. Seems to be improved, but still
> unacceptable.
What do you expect from a PowerPC processor that's used for mikrotik's
routerboards?
Thake a look in dmesg.
--
Eduardo Scho
1:33 EST
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Eduardo Schoedler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
t; ___
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>> _______
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether
There's no need to run "protocols ldp" ?
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2014-11-12 17:18 GMT-02:00 Alexander Arseniev :
> There is a line missing on MX side:
>
> set interfaces lt-0/0/0.0 family ccc
>
> Thanks
> Alex
>
> 12/11/2014 16:51, Raphael Mazelier wrote
46 matches
Mail list logo
