On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On 1 June 2016 at 20:32, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> > I suspect that there is not that high of a risk of bugs due to this
> change, in all likelihood, the only changes required for this was a
> different compiler and perhaps the use of a few 64 bi
64bit RPD is newer, and by nature will have more bugs - so don't run this
unless you need it. Check this with "show task memory" - this will show
what you have used of the RPD accessible memory. As Phil notes, you'd need
significant RIB scale (which does exist in larger networks) to require
this...
Increase the route preference on the LSP;
[edit protocols mpls label-switched-path R1-R2-a]
+preference 200;
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Masood Ahmad Shah
wrote:
> Raising LSP metric sounds good to me
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:00 PM, tim tiriche
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > i ha
3 matches
Mail list logo