On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Karl Gerhard wrote:
thanks for sharing, seems like all Junos versions above 17.3R3 are affected.
I'd been hoping this was specific to 18.x, but no such luck. We'd just
settled on 17.4 in large part due to the number of times we've heard that
it's received "extra QA",
[mailto:r...@loonybin.net]
*Sent:* Thu, Sep 27, 2018 12:20 AM CEST
*To:* Ivan Malyarchuk
*Cc:* juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* [j-nsp] "set routing-options protect core" breaks local-preference
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Ivan Mal
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Ivan Malyarchuk wrote:
Hi. We also find something wrong with "protect core".
Seems like Junos 18.1 and 18.2 (running on MX204 in our case) makes one
#Multipath equal-cost group with ALL paths except one worst AND one with worst
path - as backup.
I think it must create
> From: "Rolf Hanßen" [mailto:n...@rhanssen.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:14 PM
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I do not agree with your praise for the vm lab.
> When I think of the last (real) issues in our network or things that
fucked up
> with Software-Upgrades, in most of the cases testing it
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 01:54:45PM +0100, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> With regards to Gert's caveat "we're too small to build a lab..."
> There are two kinds of testing that can be done,
> 1) concept testing
> 2) performance and scale testing
>
> Virtual lab is perfect for concept
Hi Adam,
I do not agree with your praise for the vm lab.
When I think of the last (real) issues in our network or things that
fucked up with Software-Upgrades, in most of the cases testing it with an
virtual device before would not have helped at all.
Some samples:
We had 2x MX960 that failed
Till: 'Karl Gerhard' ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] "set routing-options protect core" breaks local-preference
> From: Karl Gerhard [mailto:karl_g...@gmx.at]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:48 AM
>
> One of the worst things about running Juniper ha
]
*Sent:* Tue, Sep 11, 2018 9:52 AM CEST
*To:* 'Karl Gerhard'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* [j-nsp] "set routing-options protect core" br
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Karl Gerhard
>
> Hello
>
> I am experimenting with BGP PIC before deploying it to production and I
> have found an oddity:
> With "set routing-options protect core" local-preference stops
Hi. We also find something wrong with "protect core".
Seems like Junos 18.1 and 18.2 (running on MX204 in our case) makes one
#Multipath equal-cost group with ALL paths except one worst AND one with worst
path - as backup.
I think it must create #Multipath forwarding-only route with one best
Hello
I am experimenting with BGP PIC before deploying it to production and I have
found an oddity:
With "set routing-options protect core" local-preference stops working the way
I would expect it to work.
If I configure "local-preference 120" on import from my IBGP neighbor the
router will
11 matches
Mail list logo
