Hey Michael,
> After going back to review what I actually did vs what I thought I did when
> enabling hyper-mode, I very much got it backwards re icmp redirects. You
> have to allow redirects to be sent to use hyper-mode. That's a step
> backwards and a calculated risk to take. I disallow
sp
> Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2019 4:23 PM
> To: Saku Ytti
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hyper Mode on MX
>
> Saku/Franz-
>
> I admit I didn't know what vlan padding was going into enabling hyper mode
> (or frankly even this conversation) an
riday, March 8, 2019 11:11 AM
> To: Michael Hare
> Cc: Franz Georg Köhler ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hyper Mode on MX
>
> Hey Michael,
>
> > I have used successfully used hyper mode on MPC4E in M2K for a few
> years with little regrets. I ch
Hey Michael,
> I have used successfully used hyper mode on MPC4E in M2K for a few years with
> little regrets. I chose to do this as I didn't have the equipment to do
> line rate testing and I do a significant amount of counters on untrusted
> ports. As others have suggested, you need to
rg Köhler
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 3:40 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Hyper Mode on MX
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it is gererally a good idea to enable HyperMode on MX or if
> there are reasons not do do so?
>
> We are currently runnin
> Franz Georg Köhler
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 11:46 AM
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi
> wrote:
> > By the way HyperMode is only useful if you expect some very high
> > throughput with very small packets (none of the MPCs are linerate
> > using very small
Junos Fusion is not supported when hyper-mode is enabled.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Franz
Georg Köhler
Sent: 07 March 2019 12:46
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hyper Mode on MX
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi
wrote:
> By the way HyperMode is only useful if you expect some very high
> throughput with very small packets (none of the MPCs are linerate
> using very small packets, but HyperMode brings it closer).
Thanks.
While we actually don't
By the way HyperMode is only useful if you expect some very high throughput
with very small packets (none of the MPCs are linerate using very small
packets, but HyperMode brings it closer).
Your Junirepresentative may show you a linerate performance/packet size graph
with/without HyperMode to
> On 7/03/2019, at 10:40 PM, Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it is gererally a good idea to enable HyperMode on MX or if
> there are reasons not do do so?
>
> We are currently running MX960 with FPC7.
Hello,
I wonder if it is gererally a good idea to enable HyperMode on MX or if
there are reasons not do do so?
We are currently running MX960 with FPC7.
Best regards,
Franz Georg Köhler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
11 matches
Mail list logo