Hi list,
Last night it appears I had a FPC go offline and then come back.
This is a MX480 running 11.2R1.10. Both routing engines look ok, the
master is still the master, and neither rebooted.
The box is doing very light work (BGP/OSPF) and was only installed several
months ago. We are only
Hey all,
Before I punt this to JTAC, has anyone had any experience with
poor/highly-variable TCP throughput from a small stack of EX3300s?
We've got a stack of 3, one 48 port, and two 24 ports, and since they went in
we can't get reliable TCP transfers transatlantic.
Linux-Linux can go really
On 17/05/12 17:16, Mike Williams wrote:
Hey all,
Before I punt this to JTAC, has anyone had any experience with
poor/highly-variable TCP throughput from a small stack of EX3300s?
This is *through* the switch, yes? Not *to* it?
We've got a stack of 3, one 48 port, and two 24 ports, and since
those TCP statistics have nothing to do with traffic passing through the switch
ports, that's for traffic to the control plane (FreeBSD)
Mike Williams [mike.willi...@comodo.com] wrote:
Hey all,
Before I punt this to JTAC, has anyone had any experience with
poor/highly-variable TCP
Hi,
I have an MX-80 acting as a PE router, where ge-1/1/1 is the CE-facing
interface which is connected to the trunk port of a switch. The
configuration looks like this:
[edit interfaces ge-1/1/1]
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
unit 0 {
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
On 2012-05-18, at 9:29 AM, Saba Sumsam wrote:
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
unit 0 {
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
vlan-id-range 700-800;
family ccc;
}
unit 400 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list 400;
}
Cant do that. Youve told the MX that
Try using encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services on the CE facing
interface.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saba Sumsam
Sent: Friday, 18 May 2012 9:29 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
7 matches
Mail list logo