[j-nsp] Process swi3: ipopt ip6opt on the MX80
Hi to all! I have question Is responsible for what this process? PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 38 root1 -36 -155 0K16K WAIT 279:04 31.25% swi3: ipopt ip6opt Without specific reasons for increased load average and cpu, will clarify at what increased only inerrupt value run show chassis routing-engine Routing Engine status: Temperature 45 degrees C / 113 degrees F CPU temperature 57 degrees C / 134 degrees F DRAM 2048 MB (2048 MB installed) Memory utilization 91 percent CPU utilization: User 9 percent Background 0 percent Kernel 9 percent * Interrupt 55 percent* Idle 28 percent Model RE-MX80-T Start time 2014-08-21 21:36:17 EEST Uptime 19 days, 12 hours, 5 minutes, 7 seconds Last reboot reason Router rebooted after a normal shutdown. Load averages: 1 minute 5 minute 15 minute 3.37 3.90 3.52 Best Regards, Yury Vladarchyk, Network Engineer, ITBiz Phone: +38 (044) 597 10 90 Mobile: +38 (050) 301 16 13 Skype: yury.vladarchyk ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Sybex JNCIE-M Study Guide case study configuration files
Dear group, Does anyone has the files from the CD that comes with this text book (JNCIE-M Study Guide published by Sybex)? I recently bought the book from Amazon, but the CD is not included. This book was released few years ago, and I can no longer buy brand new copy anymore. I do not think there is any licensing issue with sharing the config files, as you can get the soft copy of the book for free from Juniper website. Thanks for sharing in advance. Huan ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] BGP Peer formatting
Awesome, thank you very much :-) Both work great! Scott H. On 9/9/14, 9:32 PM, Ben Dale wrote: On 10 Sep 2014, at 7:54 am, Scott Harvanek scott.harva...@login.com wrote: This is a silly/OCD question; I've faced this before and I can't recall how it was prettied up... If I recall there is a way to pretty up the formatting of show bgp summary; Peer AS InPkt OutPktOutQ Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped... XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX X4463666 120866 0 0 5w3d 9:31:20 Establ inet.0: 272410/510233/510233/0 To remove the line break / fix the table formatting. I've tried adjusting screen-width with no joy. Halp? There's a few ways to neaten it, but it's a case of which information you can live without: show bgp summary | except inet show bgp group summary | match l: Failing that, I just hacked up an op script to only show a summarised version from each peer - output here: https://github.com/dfex/DFEXjunoscripts/blob/master/show-bgp-neat.md Code here: https://github.com/dfex/DFEXjunoscripts/blob/master/show-bgp-neat.slax The script *should* sum all the prefixes from each RIB into a single summarised number per peer, but I haven't had a chance to test it too thoroughly yet. Feedback/Pull Requests welcome. Cheers, Ben ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Sybex JNCIE-M Study Guide case study configuration files
I have placed copies of the configs files for case studies and the chapter on google drive: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByOb4tf4FcWGd2VlNHRoNDNyVmMusp=sharing HTHs. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Huan Pham Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:45 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Sybex JNCIE-M Study Guide case study configuration files Dear group, Does anyone has the files from the CD that comes with this text book (JNCIE-M Study Guide published by Sybex)? I recently bought the book from Amazon, but the CD is not included. This book was released few years ago, and I can no longer buy brand new copy anymore. I do not think there is any licensing issue with sharing the config files, as you can get the soft copy of the book for free from Juniper website. Thanks for sharing in advance. Huan ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] T4000 power architecture
Hi Aqeel - thanks for the reply. Agree 100% - the problem is, we only seem to be getting power to FPC0 from one PEM... have a look below (and also note that FPC1 is fine, as are the rest of the FPCs). The question is - are we looking at a PEM fault here, or a midplane fault? As per previous discussion, the FPC itself seems fine, as moving it to another slot resolves the issue. Putting another card into slot 0 yields the same result as below. PEM 0 status: State Online Temperature32 degrees C / 89 degrees F DC Input: OK Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) INPUT 0 54.750 4.312 2369 INPUT 1 54.500 6.000 327 13 INPUT 2 54.625 11.750 641 26 INPUT 3 54.750 6.125 335 13 INPUT 4 54.250 10.500 569 23 INPUT 5 54.500 6.062 330 13 DC Output Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) FPC 0 55.062 8.625 474 31 FPC 1 55.250 4.062 224 14 ...snip... PEM 1 status: State Online Temperature30 degrees C / 86 degrees F DC Input: OK Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) INPUT 0 54.500 3.250 1777 INPUT 1 54.625 3.375 1847 INPUT 2 54.500 12.437 677 28 INPUT 3 54.500 5.125 279 11 INPUT 4 54.625 12.062 658 27 INPUT 5 54.375 2.750 1496 DC Output Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) FPC 0 0.000 0.00000 FPC 1 55.125 4.500 248 16 ...snip... On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:48 PM, aqeel ahmed aqee...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Though aimed for redundancy If system has both power supplies installed then it will automatically load balance and in case one power supply goes down then whole system will be on single power supply left working. For further details you can refer to following juniper document. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information-products/topic-collections/hardware/t-series/t4000/hwguide/t4000-hwguide.pdf Regards On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:16 AM, Sam Silvester sam.silves...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Can anybody shed any light on how the PEMs on a T4000 actually distribute power to each FPC slot? Have the case of a single FPC slot that is showing power being received from only one of the PEMs, whilst all the other FPC slots are load sharing as expected. Replacing the FPC shows the same issue, so we're pretty happy that it's slot specific. What I'm curious about is if the midplane has individual 'traces' (for lack of a better term) for supplying power to each FPC from the two PEMs, or if there is a common bus shared between all the FPCs from each PEM. The reason I ask is if the PEM only has a single connection to the midplane, replacing it seems pointless and instead it looks like we're better off replacing the midplane. If the PEM has individual outputs to each slot, then replacing the PEM seems like a reasonable approach. I've been pointed at the following document ( http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/power-supply-t4000-description.html ) which is very light-on in terms of detail. Does anybody know if there is a more detailed document available (or even internally?) that we can ask about? Thanks! ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] T4000 power architecture
Pins 'seem' ok from a visual inspection. Our support vendor is involved, however because of reasons I'm getting the feeling we're now playing whack-a-mole with randomly replacing components, as opposed to actually using the results from previous tests such as moving the FPC to guide us towards a most likely culprit. The reason I'd like to know if the PEM has 'individual' outputs / feeds to each FPC vs. a bus arrangement vai the midplane is that will hopefully prevent needlessly changing out the PEM if it's more likely the midplane, or vice-versa. Requests so far for a more detailed power architecture have been met with being sent that same (basic) document over and over; you'd think somebody, somewhere would have some more detailed insight into the power architecture of these beasts. Sam On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote: Can you see any physical damage to any of the pins on the midplane? I and my colleagues have come across a number of damaged sockets, bent pins etc. May not be easy to do, but perhaps power cycle all of the inputs to that PEM, and perhaps unseat and inspect for damage on the pins for it as well. If not, JTAC and see what they say. I'd like to hear the outcome though, as I work a lot with Juniper routers, this could be a useful bit of knowledge! On 10 September 2014 23:36, Sam Silvester sam.silves...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Aqeel - thanks for the reply. Agree 100% - the problem is, we only seem to be getting power to FPC0 from one PEM... have a look below (and also note that FPC1 is fine, as are the rest of the FPCs). The question is - are we looking at a PEM fault here, or a midplane fault? As per previous discussion, the FPC itself seems fine, as moving it to another slot resolves the issue. Putting another card into slot 0 yields the same result as below. PEM 0 status: State Online Temperature32 degrees C / 89 degrees F DC Input: OK Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) INPUT 0 54.750 4.312 2369 INPUT 1 54.500 6.000 327 13 INPUT 2 54.625 11.750 641 26 INPUT 3 54.750 6.125 335 13 INPUT 4 54.250 10.500 569 23 INPUT 5 54.500 6.062 330 13 DC Output Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) FPC 0 55.062 8.625 474 31 FPC 1 55.250 4.062 224 14 ...snip... PEM 1 status: State Online Temperature30 degrees C / 86 degrees F DC Input: OK Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) INPUT 0 54.500 3.250 1777 INPUT 1 54.625 3.375 1847 INPUT 2 54.500 12.437 677 28 INPUT 3 54.500 5.125 279 11 INPUT 4 54.625 12.062 658 27 INPUT 5 54.375 2.750 1496 DC Output Voltage(V) Current(A) Power(W) Load(%) FPC 0 0.000 0.00000 FPC 1 55.125 4.500 248 16 ...snip... On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:48 PM, aqeel ahmed aqee...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Though aimed for redundancy If system has both power supplies installed then it will automatically load balance and in case one power supply goes down then whole system will be on single power supply left working. For further details you can refer to following juniper document. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information-products/topic-collections/hardware/t-series/t4000/hwguide/t4000-hwguide.pdf Regards On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:16 AM, Sam Silvester sam.silves...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Can anybody shed any light on how the PEMs on a T4000 actually distribute power to each FPC slot? Have the case of a single FPC slot that is showing power being received from only one of the PEMs, whilst all the other FPC slots are load sharing as expected. Replacing the FPC shows the same issue, so we're pretty happy that it's slot specific. What I'm curious about is if the midplane has individual 'traces' (for lack of a better term) for supplying power to each FPC from the two PEMs, or if there is a common bus shared between all the FPCs from each PEM. The reason I ask is if the PEM only has a single connection to the midplane, replacing it seems pointless and instead it looks like we're better off replacing the midplane. If the PEM has individual outputs to each slot, then replacing the PEM seems like a
