Re: [j-nsp] MX104 recommended Junos version?

My dual MX104's running 14.2R7.5 is proving nice and stable for my ~7,000 dsl customers being cgnat'd via MS-MIC-16G -Aaron Gould ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 recommended Junos version?

We are running version 15.1R5 and 15.1R5-S4 in most of our routers. We upgraded the version to use BGP PIC in inet.0. Until now everything is working pretty good. MT Em 23/06/2017 10:57, Josh Baird escreveu: We had to upgrade to 14.1.R7 (per JTAC) due to a memory/resource issue when using

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 recommended Junos version?

We had to upgrade to 14.1.R7 (per JTAC) due to a memory/resource issue when using unofficial optics. On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Matt Freitag wrote: > I'm still on 13.3R9, their previous recommendation, and don't have a > problem. > > Matt Freitag > Network Engineer >

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 recommended Junos version?

I'm still on 13.3R9, their previous recommendation, and don't have a problem. Matt Freitag Network Engineer Information Technology Michigan Technological University (906) 487-3696 <%28906%29%20487-3696> https://www.mtu.edu/ https://www.mtu.edu/it On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Josh Baird

[j-nsp] MX104 recommended Junos version?

This page [1] shows that the recommended version is 15.1R6, but this page [1] says 14.1R7 for the MX104. I know the MX104's PPC RE cannot use the SMP kernel included in 15.1, but I understand an older kernel will be installed for these PPC devices. I'm currently running 14.2R6.5 but I am having

Re: [j-nsp] Cut-through forwarding statistics on QFX5100

On 23 June 2017 at 08:39, Vincent Bernat wrote: Hey, > Related question: why isn't cut-through the default mode? Is there any > downside of this mode (apart from forwarding invalid frames which > shouldn't matter much nowaday)? You'll pass errored frames to the network, as