Re: [j-nsp] mx960 to mx960 via ciena 6500 - mtu smaller in the middle

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Aaron Gould wrote: See juniper interface MTU is set to max 16000 bytes. but when I ping I can only get 9584 bytes through to the other side of the link. This mx960 is linked to another mx960, but Ciena 6500 dwdm is in between the mx960's. Is there any reason why I should

Re: [j-nsp] mx960 to mx960 via ciena 6500 - mtu smaller in the middle

Hi, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:14:46PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > See juniper interface MTU is set to max 16000 bytes. but when I ping I can > > only get 9584 bytes through to the other side of the link. This mx960 is > > linked to another mx960, but Ciena 6500 dwdm is in between the

Re: [j-nsp] mx960 to mx960 via ciena 6500 - mtu smaller in the middle

> See juniper interface MTU is set to max 16000 bytes. but when I ping I can > only get 9584 bytes through to the other side of the link. This mx960 is > linked to another mx960, but Ciena 6500 dwdm is in between the mx960's. > > Is there any reason why I should be concerned that currently Ciena

[j-nsp] mx960 to mx960 via ciena 6500 - mtu smaller in the middle

See juniper interface MTU is set to max 16000 bytes. but when I ping I can only get 9584 bytes through to the other side of the link. This mx960 is linked to another mx960, but Ciena 6500 dwdm is in between the mx960's. Is there any reason why I should be concerned that currently Ciena tells