Re: [j-nsp] ipv6-tunneling

Sounds like you are doing 6VPE if you have an interface on the PE facing the CE inside a VRF. You need: - family inet6 on the EBGP inside the VRF facing the customer. Assuming your CE want to teach you ipv6 routes via EBGP. - family inet6-vpn on the IBGP between the PE's in the core. - You

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BGP based VPLS interoperability with other vendors

I have no configs go hand but have done with VPLS with J and C no problem. Can you post the following? show bgp sum and show bgp neighbor for peering with the huawei PE in question. I assume you peer directly with the huawei and not via a RR? show conf routing-instance for vpls instance show

Re: [j-nsp] l3vpn help needed

Chances are his lsp to remote PE is up as he has the following route his is pinging active in his vrf. 10.10.2.0/24 *[BGP/170] 05:27:25, localpref 100, from 10.2.0.1 AS path: I to 172.16.150.1 via ge-0/0/1.0, Push 16, Push 299808(top) If the

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper M120 - PPM causing issues for BFD

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN/170/-101

This can be seen on BGP routes in general. I remembered some wierdness with respect to 1 complements and google turned up the following. https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swcmdref-protocols/show-route-detail.html In order to use common comparison routines, JUNOS software

Re: [j-nsp] l2tp sessions on MX

static routes? Any help will be greatly appreciated.. Regards ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe

Re: [j-nsp] bla.bla.bla.0

interfaces. Not sure which one is ugly and not useable at the moment. But would love to hear from you guys... ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 filter buggy?

will see if that fixes it. I doubt that'll fix your issue...but who knows :) -chris ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF IMPORT POLICIES

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF IMPORT POLICIES

list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Graphing VCP Backplane

If you can find a counter for the vcp throughput then you can populate the utility mib with the value and snmp poll and graph it. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.3/topics/task/operational/snmp-best-practices-utility-mib-using.html That said for all I know there might be a

Re: [j-nsp] RSTP over logical-system.

. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] transparent VLANs

extended-vlan-vpls encap should forward TPIDs 0x8100, 0x9100, and 0x9901 -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Having the same interface in multiple routing instances

As Stefan mentions one logical unit must to belong to one routing instance. But you can play (ugly) games with rib groups and interface routes. The newer instance import policies feature should work for non VRF instance as well but I only implemented it with RIB groups so far. The logical unit

Re: [j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory useincrease with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Hidden and invisible routes

behaviour? Thanks, Tom ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Manually installing JunOS on crashed HD (no CF available)

___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [j-nsp] Hidden and invisible routes

Interestingly you see a hidden route if the static route does a recursive lookup. See config below and then show route output. The nexthop interface for 10.0.21.2 is down when the below was executed. This seems to show that at commit time , unless a static is set to resolve via indirect

Re: [j-nsp] MTU Compression

Are you mixing up MTU and TCP MSS (Maximum Segment Size), a MSS is not MTU but can cause MTU issues. Also beware mixing up JUNOS protocol bgp mss adustment, which are only for the routers bgp tcp sessions with general MSS rewrite. The general mss rewrite affects all tcp syns crossing the box.

Re: [j-nsp] Stripping off BGP Prepends

Your right but the customer never enjoys being told it could be dangerous to give them that power :-) -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Stripping off BGP Prepends

: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper

Re: [j-nsp] Stripping off BGP Prepends

Not the first time I've been told my proposition is technically possible but to to ugly to execute ;-) Phill ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS label allocation

Need to be careful when describing the formula. local/remote site id means varies depending on perspective. for example: PE-A, (connected to customer site id 1), advertises a label base of 1000, range of 4 and offset of 1 This route is received by remote PE-B that has another sight in the same

Re: [j-nsp] Event Log RPD_SCHED_SLIP M20

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Policer burst-size-limit, can someone please explain?

but the results are identical for 100g MBS as the rest of the lines in the file). ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe

Re: [j-nsp] LAG Problem Cisco/Juniper

{            members xx;        }    } } ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper

Re: [j-nsp] tftp server

/ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] The P2MP LSP story when using LDP for VPLS?

All good things come to those who wait :-) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-08 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS Question

://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Phill Jolliffe ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] System board memory expansion on M7i

The cfeb computes/compiles the jtree that will be stored in the in the sram. Presumably this means the raw forwarding table has to be stored in the cfeb. The 'show route summary' command (on the cfeb not the normal RE CLI) shows this. CSBR0(London-AMS1 vty)# show route summary IPv4 Route