I don't know , that is something I would also wanted to know. Is it
possible to run MLPPP on concatenated STM/POS interfaces?
Regards,
Samit
Benny Sumitro wrote:
Hi,
Can you bundle STM-1 using MLPPP? AFAIK bundling STM-4 can only be
done by using aggregated sonet and is prop to Juniper.
Hi,
Can you bundle STM-1 using MLPPP? AFAIK bundling STM-4 can only be
done by using aggregated sonet and is prop to Juniper.
If you succeeded, could you paste the config and share it with me?
Thanks,
Benny
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:02:29PM +0100, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Hi Samit,
No, LACP is supported on any ethernet (not sure about really old ones)
interfaces.
Any relatively new Catalist should support LACP as well, if you are going to
use SX optic on juniper, use SX on cisco as well :)
LACP
PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 9 november 2007 17:51
To: Jeff Tantsura
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] STM-4 and Gig LACP Connectivity between Juniper and
Ciscogear
Hi Jeff,
Since multilink ppp require adaptive service pic, Do I need any specific
interface or junos ver
I just went through some older post which states that even AS-PIC also
requires FPC-E. Does Multilink Services PIC also requires FPC-E PIC ?
Regards,
Samit
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:02:29PM +0100, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Hi Samit,
No, LACP is supported on any
Sent: woensdag 7 november 2007 12:36
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] STM-4 and Gig LACP Connectivity between Juniper and
Ciscogear
Hi,
I am planning to get Juniper router and fit between two Cisco gear.
Since I don't have any practical knowledge in juniper gear and junos
6 matches
Mail list logo
