Over the years, we have run into a couple of issues that translated to either
exhausting FPC memory or corrupting the JTree. Currently, life is good on
13.3R6, which we run on all MX's globally. I haven't run into this specific
issue, and I am just assuming that behavior is improved.
Best
Chris,
I do understand. My initial thoughts were all theoretical. Helping me
understand RSVP and the MPLS more. With some help I did discover i had a
typo between the links forcing them not to pull up any protocol even OSPF
(my internal MPLS routing). So my entire config was right but I had
Disabling Basic-Table certainly bought you some time.
Agree that it still does not look good. I suspect that you are running into a
software issue. 11.4 is no longer a supported version, 12.3 is the minimum
supported today, with 13.3R6 as the recommended version. Is it possible for
you to
Hi,
yes, an upgrade is absolutely possible but since there are no major
issues with that release, we didn't do that yet. Are you just assuming a
newer software improves that or did Juniper really do something on that
side?
Best,
Jeff
Am 22.07.2015 um 02:45 schrieb Phil Rosenthal:
All,
Double Checked the Layer 2 ring today and it seems solid.
Once again we have B and C co-located and A and D in remote locations with
a link between them.
Currently there is no RSVP between C and D and this is making my ring go
right instead of left!
I can Ping from D to C (it's next hop
Saku Ytti wrote:
1) It’s 3.5U high, making rack planning a little weird, and requiring me to
buy a hard to find half-U blank panel
It is targeting metro applications, where racks often are telco racks. job-1
and job-2 were thrilled to get MX104 form-factor, MX80 was very problematic
and
Gents,
has anybody seen a dual RE MX gear switch the routing engine master to
backup due to a “possibly bad console cable” ?
Jul 1 11:21:29.941 2015 MX480LON_0 init: getty repeating too quickly on
port /dev/ttyd0, sleeping 30 secs
Did you happen to find a resolution for this? That
Once upon a time, Ross Halliday ross.halli...@wtccommunications.ca said:
On Sun servers there used to be a way cool method to get them to reboot: Send
a trillion BREAKs over the console. Same thing could happen if you rebooted
your console device a few times, or, indeed, if the cable was bad.
I'm bashing away at a conundrum here. I'm trying to lab a setup for a
multi-VLAN subscriber over some GPON gear. The setup is:
MX104 --2x-- OLT -- ONT -- subscriber
The ONT is able to strip the outer VLAN tag facing the subscriber, so the CE
can hit all of the inner VLANs directly. The
I know that a ton of fixes on BGP convergence time son MX80 is definitely a
reason to be 'moving up'... however as you're on RE-2000s on MX480 may not be
applicable.
I see you're running DPC cards, have you considered shifting those links onto
an MPC/Trio Card? (newer chip, more RAM, more
Post relevant configs and an actual diagram (Visio - PDF)
Without this, anything we say is pure speculation -- and we end up playing '20
questions' with you. Getting an MPLS/RSVP/LDP/IGP/BGP/Mesh/TE network setup
involves multiple steps and config-knobs being turned on and turned on
correctly.
Hello list,
we seem to be running into limits with a MX480 with RE-2000 and 2x
DPCE-4XGE-R since we are seeing these new messages in the syslog:
Jul 22 00:50:36 cr0 fpc0 RSMON: Resource Category:jtree
Instance:jtree0-seg0 Type:free-dwords Available:83072 is less than LWM
limit:104857,
Can you paste the output of these commands:
show conf | display set | match rpf-check
show ver
show route sum
DPC should have enough memory for ~1M FIB. This can get divided in half if you
are using RPF. If you have multiple routing instances, this also can contribute
to the problem.
Best
Hi Phil,
sure:
{master}
jeff@cr0 show configuration | display set | match rpf-check
{master}
nico@FRA4.cr0 show version
Hostname: cr0
Model: mx480
JUNOS Base OS boot [11.4R9.4]
JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [11.4R9.4]
JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [11.4R9.4]
JUNOS Crypto Software Suite
What does the price point of the ME3600X/ASR920 platform look like? Looks
like for at least the ASR920 and 10G SPF+ ports you have the buy the
chassis and then upgrade licenses?
Considering a Juniper GFX5100 is ~$11k brand new does it make any sense to
go with something like an ASR920, or does
On 21/Jul/15 14:41, Colton Conor wrote:
What does the price point of the ME3600X/ASR920 platform look like?
Looks like for at least the ASR920 and 10G SPF+ ports you have the buy
the chassis and then upgrade licenses?
As with any vendor, the best deal you can do is one that won't be
16 matches
Mail list logo
