On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 14:28, Nitzan Tzelniker
wrote:
> Does any body know if the LC CPU on the MX204 has less power than the one in
> MPC7 or in MX10003 LC
> I saw some scaling numbers for subscriber management and it looks like some
> numbers are very low on the MX204 compared to MX10003 LC
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:34, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On our MX480's, we've known for a very long time that IPv4 BFD is
> supported in the PFE. However, IPv6 BFD runs on the RE.
PFE is an ambiguous term, it variably means NPU or LC CPU inside JNPR.
There are several places where you can run your
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 06:55, Rob Foehl wrote:
> Atypical only in that there's no chassis switch involved on the Ethernet
> link... The comment above was about software catching up to what's
> (functionally) missing from the line card, in this case.
I can't parse this, sorry.
> PR1444186 --
On 12/Nov/19 12:02, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Do you run BFD keepalives from LC CPU or NPU? I don't know if MX204
> has real linecard CPU, or if it is like PTX1k where due to cost saving
> there is no separate linecard CPU. If that is the case, and you don't
> want NPU/inline BFD disabling
Does any body know if the LC CPU on the MX204 has less power than the one
in MPC7 or in MX10003 LC
I saw some scaling numbers for subscriber management and it looks like some
numbers are very low on the MX204 compared to MX10003 LC
These are control plane tasks that are distributed to the PFE so I
On 12/Nov/19 13:28, Saku Ytti wrote:
> PFE is an ambiguous term, it variably means NPU or LC CPU inside JNPR.
>
> There are several places where you can run your keepalieve
>
> a) RPD
> b) RE PPMd
> c) LC CPU PPMd
> d) NPU (dispatch block in the LU/XL)
>
> And it depends on config where you
> Rob Foehl
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:19 AM
>
> Given a pair of EX uplinked to a pair of MX, with various downstream CE
that
> may be single devices or their own layer 2 topologies, as in this terrible
> diagram:
>
>MX1 - MX2
>| / \ |
>EX1 EX2
> \ /
> CEs
>
On 12/Nov/19 06:55, Rob Foehl wrote:
>
>
>
>
> New platform, new bugs... My only real complaint is how long it takes
> to get fixes turned around these days.
Yep, pretty standard.
Per usual, it will settle down.
Unlike the MX80 and MX104, the MX204 looks to have the stones to stick
8 matches
Mail list logo
