Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 03:58:00PM +, Jackson, William via juniper-nsp wrote: > We have had to send to the clients via DHCP a set of /32 host routes to > circumvent this problem. If you are able to configure the clients with /32 routes via DHCP, why don't you just configure the clients with

Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

set of /32 host routes to circumvent this problem. I will open a TAC case and raise with my SE to see whats what. Thanks for the feedback. From: Roger Wiklund Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 2:25 PM To: Aaron1 Cc: Jackson, William ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp o

Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

, 2023 2:25 PM To: Aaron1 Cc: Jackson, William ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb ** WARNING: This email originates from outside of the organisation ** Hi It seems that proxy arp is disabled by default: proxy-arp | Junos OS | Juniper Networks<ht

Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

Hi It seems that proxy arp is disabled by default: proxy-arp | Junos OS | Juniper Networks Regarding proxy-arp for EVPN (arp suppression) it only works for the same

Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

As I recall, proxy-arp behavior is proven by looking in the local host arp cache and finding entries for foreign ip’s mapped to the default gateway’s mac address. If that is still occurring, then it would seem that proxy arp functionality is still working and you can move on to tshooting

[j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

Hi Maybe somebody knows the answer to this one: We migrated some customers to an EVPN domain away from a legacy node that used proxy-arp on its L3 interface. The downstream clients have some funky routing and they are relying on proxy-arp to resolve an offnet address (don't ask me why for our