Thank you Ryan this library is a great idea. How about we discuss this
type/class question on the new issue tracker after it gets created?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:03 PM, 'Ryan Blue' via Project Jupyter <
jupyter@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> The com.github.jupyter group does come from jitpack. If
The com.github.jupyter group does come from jitpack. If there's a better
way to publish Jars from the Jupyter organization, I'm all for that.
Otherwise, I think the simplicity of jitpack is worth the trade-off of
having a weird groupId.
On the wrapper class, the choice of a Map was to keep
Hi,
If I wanted to add a custom notebook action for showing/hiding/toggling
menu bar, would including the code below
into /notebook/static/notebook/js/actions.js work and correctly add entry
to /.jupyter/nbconfig/notebook.json if a custom keyboard shortcut was
created?
'toggle-menubar':{
If we have a steering council member sponsoring/facilitating it, and there
is an active community working on it, then I'm +1 to giving it a repo under
the Jupyter github org. Thanks Kyle and everyone involved!
Jason
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:56 PM s...@draves.org wrote:
>
Sounds like a good standard to have, we will support in BeakerX. I already
filed an issue: https://github.com/twosigma/beakerx/issues/5120
Is that the right namespace though? Shouldn't it be
org.jupyter.something? Is jitpack enforcing that?
Also, it looks like it's using a Map as the mime
I am +1 on this proposal. I think having good JVM support is really
important and there is a huge benefit to having it "in-org". Thanks
for working on this stuff Kyle!
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Kyle Kelley wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up on the Scala discussion and
Hey all,
Following up on the Scala discussion and action list, Ryan created
https://github.com/rdblue/jupyter-repr-api to standardize JVM object
representation to benefit both libraries and kernels.
I'd like folks to be able to keep moving on this (while still advancing
Toree and other kernels)
On 5 April 2017 at 16:55, Adam Rule wrote:
> I'm running version 4.1.0 so I'll update to 5.0 and check if
> finished_execute.CodeCell gets thrown. If not, I'll file an issue.
>
Thanks Adam :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 5 April 2017 at 16:39, 'Bergam' via Project Jupyter <
jupyter@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Is the kernel_gateway ready for production use?
AFAIK yes, but I hope some of the people who built it will chime in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I'm running version 4.1.0 so I'll update to 5.0 and check if
finished_execute.CodeCell gets thrown. If not, I'll file an issue.
On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 7:11:36 AM UTC-7, takowl wrote:
>
> On 4 April 2017 at 23:34, Adam Rule
> wrote:
>
>> My problem is that some
Thanks, Thomas! It sounds like both the kernel_gateway and the Jupyter
Notebook server would both work for my purposes then. Is the kernel_gateway
ready for production use?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Project Jupyter" group.
To unsubscribe
On 4 April 2017 at 23:34, Adam Rule wrote:
> My problem is that some actions seem to call code that runs asynchronously
> and my post-application block runs before the action has been applied.
>
Yeah, that's not uncommon with Javascript - lots of things are async, so a
Min,
Thanks for getting back to me. I was able to determine root cause.
My upgrade was throwing an error (I missed it in my earlier attempts to
upgrade);
Command "python setup.py egg_info" failed with error code 1 in /tmp/pip-
build-Gg_x9G/tornado/
To correct this error I had to upgrade Setup
What do you see from pip list?
You can check the notebook version with jupyter notebook --version. jupyter
--version only shows the version of the jupyter-core package, which
provides basic dispatch functionality.
-Min
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:17 AM, dukea2006 wrote:
>
14 matches
Mail list logo