Thanks; that worked perfectly.
My .kafferc now reads:
BOOTCLASSPATH=${MYBOOTCLASSPATH_PREFIX}${MYBOOTCLASSPATH_PREFIX+:}${BOOTCLASSPATH}${MYBOOTCLASSPATH_SUFFIX+:}${MYBOOTCLASSPATH_SUFFIX}
--Steve
Ito Kazumitsu wrote:
I hope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've started hacking around the JIT3 sources, and have found at least
the first point of failure: spill() in jit3/register.c is being called
in such a way that reginfo[s-regno].ctype is 0, i.e. it's type field
is unset. This causes an immediate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Casey == Casey Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Casey Secondly: if I hack slotRegister() to fill in ctype if it is
Casey blank, I get further, but then Float.isNaN returns false when
Casey given NaN, causing toCharArrayWithPrecision to barf. This
Hi,
hi,
I've started hacking around the JIT3 sources, and have found at least
the first point of failure: spill() in jit3/register.c is being called
in such a way that reginfo[s-regno].ctype is 0, i.e. it's type field
is unset. This causes an immediate ABORT because there is (obviously)
no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timothy == Timothy Stack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Timothy hi,
I've started hacking around the JIT3 sources, and have found at
least the first point of failure: spill() in jit3/register.c is
being called in such a way that
Timothy What method is being jitted? Does the MIPS jitter pass all
Timothy of the tests in the test/internal directory?
java.lang.Float.toString.
okie
I can't seem to get jitBasic to staticly
link, and
Hmm, what are the error messages? The internal tests are pretty much the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timothy == Timothy Stack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't seem to get jitBasic to staticly link, and
Timothy Hmm, what are the error messages? The internal tests are
Timothy pretty much the baby-steps, so you might want to pursue this
Timothy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWIW, this is the current state of the tests in test/internal:
ConstMathMethods.class:PASS
ConstMethods.class:PASS
ControlFlowMethods.class: PASS
MethodOptimizations.class: PASS
ObjectFields.class:
Please ignore and don't open the attachment. Sorry for any incovenience.
I've taken my old yahoo account off the list to avoid the problem in the
future.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
kaffe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So this actually doesn't surprise me much: there appear to be bugs in
the way float parameters are passed (and this, like isNaN, is static,
so this probably limits the possibilities of what's wrong).
In the period before kaffe 1.1.0, I identified a FP parameter passing
problems in JIT3 for
Hi pancake,
pancake wrote:
Hello! I'm new here.
This is a optimization proposal for kaffe.
The main idea is to share all the classpath in a server, running at localhost (or remote) that shares the classpath for all the VMs running on the same machine / network.
By this way we don't have to
Hello Andi,
Andi Reinbrecht wrote:
Hi there,
Using gcc version 2.95.3-5 (cygwin special) doesn't compile.
Yep, I've been working on getting Kaffe to build on Cygwin again off and
on. It used to build as a static binary, but there are lots of warnings.
Currently it breaks because of some
Konnichiwa Atsushi, Konnichiwa Ito, Nin how[1] John,
Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:43:40 +0900, Ito Kazumitsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kaz : I found that Kaffe might not support i18n well, which is
kaz : really bad for handling CJK. I did primitive patches on X AWT
kaz : backend for
Hi Tony,
Tony Wyatt wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
I tried to energise jikes by configuring --with-jikes, didn't make any
difference. I then discovered the Uncomment me line in
test/regression/TestScript and uncommented that, but now I'm getting
a failure on every test with classpath errors.
Is this
Hi Tony,
Tony Wyatt wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
This was a bug in our and GNU Classpath Serialization code. It was fixed
after 1.1.4 was released by Guilhem.
Has a patch been released?
See http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2004-February/045304.html for
guilhem's patch.
(OT) I have made a slight
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:53:49 +0100, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
robilad Now I am puzzled what to check in ;) I'd propose to check in
robilad Jim's patch, and then to adapt and work in your fixes for
robilad font display using Jim's code as the start. Does everyone
robilad agree?
I
16 matches
Mail list logo