On June 18, 2015 11:09:48 PM CEST, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>On 06/04/2015 03:04 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>> I am writing to let you all know that my talk on Kallithea was
>accepted
>> at OSCON:
>>
>http://www.oscon.com/open-source-2015/public/schedule/detail/42015
>>
>> Some of you saw an earl
On 06/17/2015 07:40 AM, Jan Heylen wrote:
What I also wanted to say is that the original change is most probably
not the issue, it just triggers an underlying issue...
Yeah, the issue were elsewhere. Thanks for pointing in the right direction!
My 5 cents in solving it:
* It is not the first t
On 06/04/2015 03:04 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
I am writing to let you all know that my talk on Kallithea was accepted
at OSCON:
http://www.oscon.com/open-source-2015/public/schedule/detail/42015
Some of you saw an earlier version of this talk at FOSDEM earlier this
year. As you may recall,
# HG changeset patch
# User Mads Kiilerich
# Date 1434650132 -7200
# Thu Jun 18 19:55:32 2015 +0200
# Node ID 4c64c061bd3b4f4162fbfe57eedcade1be5290d3
# Parent 7b75c8877364c24c72281759d9959255def3b159
db: add explicit constraint for the implicit invariant that all status changes
have a comm
# HG changeset patch
# User Mads Kiilerich
# Date 1434647232 -7200
# Thu Jun 18 19:07:12 2015 +0200
# Node ID 7b75c8877364c24c72281759d9959255def3b159
# Parent 5fb4e6f884cec710b34736756d4eadaa53dd51d0
pullrequsts: really create a comment when creating a PR and setting status to
'under revie
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 06/17/2015 10:02 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Mads Kiilerich
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/15/2015 04:23 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Mads Kiilerich
On 06/17/2015 10:02 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
On 06/15/2015 04:23 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Mads Kiilerich
wrote:
On 06/14/2015 09:05 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
Hi Mads,
On Fr
Hey,
On 18 June 2015 at 09:01, Thomas De Schampheleire
wrote:
> I just sent another approach, using the surrounding commentable-diff
> idea. The patch turns out to be very small, indeed much better than
> the first approach.
>
> Let me know what you think...
I like it! :)
--
Cheers,
Andrew
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>> On 06/13/2015 08:46 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>>>
>>> On June 12, 2015 11:45:31 PM CEST, Mads Kiilerich
>>> wrote:
On 06/11/2015 10:59 AM, Thomas De Scha
